Literature DB >> 16351901

Quantification of flow during suction feeding in bluegill sunfish.

Lara A Ferry-Graham1, Peter C Wainwright, George V Lauder.   

Abstract

Nearly all aquatic-feeding vertebrates use some amount of suction to capture prey items. Suction prey capture occurs by accelerating a volume of water into the mouth and taking a prey item along with it. Yet, until recently, we lacked the necessary techniques and analytical tools to quantify the flow regime generated by feeding fish. We used a new approach; Digital Particle Image Velocimetery (DPIV) to measure several attributes of the flow generated by feeding bluegill sunfish. We found that the temporal pattern of flow was notably compressed during prey capture. Flow velocity increased rapidly to its peak within 20 ms of the onset of the strike, and this peak corresponded to the time that the prey entered the mouth during capture. The rapid acceleration and deceleration of water suggests that timing is critical for the predator in positioning itself relative to the prey so that it can be drawn into the mouth along with the water. We also found that the volume of water affected by suction was spatially limited. Only rarely did we measure significant flow beyond 1.75 cm of the mouth aperture (in 20 cm fish), further emphasizing the importance of mechanisms, like locomotion, that place the fish mouth in close proximity to the prey. We found that the highest flows towards the mouth along the fish midline were generated not immediately in front of the open mouth, but approximately 0.5 cm anterior to the mouth opening. Away from the midline the peak in flow was closer to the mouth. We propose that this pattern indicates the presence of a bow wave created by the locomotor efforts of the fish. In this scheme, the bow wave acts antagonistically to the flow of water generated by suction, the net effect being to push the region of peak flow away from the open mouth. The peak was located farther from the mouth opening in strikes accompanied by faster locomotion, suggesting faster fish created larger bow waves.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 16351901     DOI: 10.1078/0944-2006-00110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Hydrodynamics of prey capture in sharks: effects of substrate.

Authors:  Sandra Nauwelaerts; Cheryl Wilga; Christopher Sanford; George Lauder
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Volumetric quantification of fluid flow reveals fish's use of hydrodynamic stealth to capture evasive prey.

Authors:  Brad J Gemmell; Deepak Adhikari; Ellen K Longmire
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity profile.

Authors:  Kristin L Bishop; Peter C Wainwright; Roi Holzman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Use of computational fluid dynamics to study forces exerted on prey by aquatic suction feeders.

Authors:  Tyler Skorczewski; Angela Cheer; Samson Cheung; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  How fish power suction feeding.

Authors:  Mark W Westneat; Aaron M Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An adaptive explanation for the horse-like shape of seahorses.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Gert Roos; Lara Ferry
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.