Literature DB >> 17248870

The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

B S Baker1, A T Carpenter, P Ripoll.   

Abstract

To inquire whether the loci identified by recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutants in Drosophila are also utilized during mitotic cell division, the effects of 18 meiotic mutants (representing 13 loci) on mitotic chromosome stability have been examined genetically. To do this, meiotic-mutant-bearing flies heterozygous for recessive somatic cell markers were examined for the frequencies and types of spontaneous clones expressing the cell markers. In such flies, marked clones can arise via mitotic recombination, mutation, chromosome breakage, nondisjunction or chromosome loss, and clones from these different origins can be distinguished. In addition, meiotic mutants at nine loci have been examined for their effects on sensitivity to killing by UV and X rays.-Mutants at six of the seven recombination-defective loci examined (mei-9, mei-41, c(3)G, mei-W68, mei-S282, mei-352, mei-218) cause mitotic chromosome instability in both sexes, whereas mutants at one locus (mei-218) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability. Thus many of the loci utilized during meiotic recombination also function in the chromosomal economy of mitotic cells.-The chromosome instability produced by mei-41 alleles is the consequence of chromosome breakage, that of mei-9 alleles is primarily due to chromosome breakage and, to a lesser extent, to an elevated frequency of mitotic recombination, whereas no predominant mechanism responsible for the instability caused by c(3)G alleles is discernible. Since these three loci are defective in their responses to mutagen damage, their effects on chromosome stability in nonmutagenized cells are interpreted as resulting from an inability to repair spontaneous lesions. Both mei-W68 and mei-S282 increase mitotic recombination (and in mei-W68, to a lesser extent, chromosome loss) in the abdomen but not the wing. In the abdomen, the primary effect on chromosome stability occurs during the larval period when the abdominal histoblasts are in a nondividing (G2) state.-Mitotic recombination is at or above control levels in the presence of each of the recombination-defective meiotic mutants examined, suggesting that meiotic and mitotic recombination are under separate genetic control in Drosophila.-Of the six mutants examined that are defective in processes required for regular meiotic chromosome segregation, four (l(1)TW-6(cs), ca(nd), mei-S332, ord) affect mitotic chromosome behavior. At semi-restrictive temperatures, the cold sensitive lethal l(1)TW-6(cs) causes very frequent somatic spots, a substantial proportion of which are attributable to nondisjunction or loss. Thus, this locus specifies a function essential for chromosome segregation at mitosis as well as at the first meiotic division in females. The patterns of mitotic effects caused by ca(nd), mei-S332, and ord suggest that they may be leaky alleles at essential loci that specify functions common to meiosis and mitosis. Mutants at the two remaining loci (nod, pal) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 17248870      PMCID: PMC1213905     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  The effect of three rad genes on survival, inter- and intragenic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces. I. UV irradiation without photoreactivation or liquid-holding post-treatment.

Authors:  S Kowalski; W Laskowski
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1975

2.  Chromosome Behavior under the Influence of Claret-Nondisjunctional in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  D G Davis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Minute Reaction in the Development of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  J Schultz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1929-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Occurrence of Mitotic Crossing-over Without Meiotic Crossing-over.

Authors:  G Leclerc
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Parameters of mitotic recombination in minute mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Ferrus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Spontaneous mutation by mutagenic repair of spontaneous lesions in DNA.

Authors:  P J Hastings; S K Quah; R C von Borstel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The genetic analysis of meiosis in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D L Lindsley; L Sandler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1977-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Characterization of postreplication repair in mutagen-sensitive strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J B Boyd; R B Setlow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Paternal loss (pal): a meiotic mutant in Drosophila melanogaster causing loss of paternal chromosomes.

Authors:  B S Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Isolation and characterization of X-linked mutants of Drosophila melanogaster which are sensitive to mutagens.

Authors:  J B Boyd; M D Golino; T D Nguyen; M M Green
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  61 in total

1.  mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; J J Sekelsky; G Tsang; R S Hawley; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Two genes required for meiotic recombination in Drosophila are expressed from a dicistronic message.

Authors:  H Liu; J K Jang; J Graham; K Nycz; K S McKim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A T Carpenter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Genetic control of chromosome breakage and rejoining in Drosophila melanogaster: spontaneous chromosome aberrations in X-linked mutants defective in DNA metabolism.

Authors:  M Gatti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants.

Authors:  W Y Miyazaki; T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Somatic instability of a Drosophila chromosome.

Authors:  D R Wines; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The lethal(1)TW-6cs mutation of Drosophila melanogaster is a dominant antimorphic allele of nod and is associated with a single base change in the putative ATP-binding domain.

Authors:  R S Rasooly; C M New; P Zhang; R S Hawley; B S Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control.

Authors:  Eric Staeva-Vieira; Siuk Yoo; Ruth Lehmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Human male infertility, probably genetically determined, due to defective meiosis and spermatogenic arrest.

Authors:  R S Chaganti; J German
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The Drosophila meiotic recombination gene mei-9 encodes a homologue of the yeast excision repair protein Rad1.

Authors:  J J Sekelsky; K S McKim; G M Chin; R S Hawley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.