Literature DB >> 17249094

Genetic variability maintained by mutation and overdominant selection in finite populations.

T Maruyama1, M Nei.   

Abstract

Mathematical properties of the overdominance model with mutation and random genetic drift are studied by using the method of stochastic differential equations (Itô and McKean 1974). It is shown that overdominant selection is very powerful in increasing the mean heterozygosity as compared with neutral mutations, and if 2Ns (N = effective population size; s = selective disadvantage for homozygotes) is larger than 10, a very low mutation rate is sufficient to explain the observed level of allozyme polymorphism. The distribution of heterozygosity for overdominant genes is considerably different from that of neutral mutations, and if the ratio of selection coefficient (s) to mutation rate (nu) is large and the mean heterozygosity (h) is lower than 0.2, single-locus heterozygosity is either approximately 0 or 0.5. If h increases further, however, heterozygosity shows a multiple-peak distribution. Reflecting this type of distribution, the relationship between the mean and variance of heterozygosity is considerably different from that for neutral genes. When s/v is large, the proportion of polymorphic loci increases approximately linearly with mean heterozygosity. The distribution of allele frequencies is also drastically different from that of neutral genes, and generally shows a peak at the intermediate gene frequency. Implications of these results on the maintenance of allozyme polymorphism are discussed.

Year:  1981        PMID: 17249094      PMCID: PMC1214452     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  RULES FOR TESTING STABILITY OF A SELECTIVE POLYMORPHISM.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Variability in the amount of heterozygosity maintained by neutral mutations.

Authors:  F M Stewart
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. I. Distribution of single locus heterozygosity.

Authors:  P A Fuerst; R Chakraborty; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Models for the logarithmic species abundance distributions.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Is the gene the unit of selection?

Authors:  I Franklin; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; L R Ginzburg; S D Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained in a natural population.

Authors:  J A Sved; T E Reed; W F Bodmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total
  40 in total

1.  Sojourn times and substitution rate at overdominant and linked neutral loci.

Authors:  J Ohashi; K Tokunaga
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heterozygote advantage fails to explain the high degree of polymorphism of the MHC.

Authors:  Rob J De Boer; José A M Borghans; Michiel van Boven; Can Keşmir; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  High MHC diversity maintained by balancing selection in an otherwise genetically monomorphic mammal.

Authors:  Andres Aguilar; Gary Roemer; Sally Debenham; Matthew Binns; David Garcelon; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  CFTR mutations and reproductive outcomes in a population isolate.

Authors:  Irene Gallego Romero; Carole Ober
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  An asymmetric model of heterozygote advantage at major histocompatibility complex genes: degenerate pathogen recognition and intersection advantage.

Authors:  Rick J Stoffels; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Excess nonsynonymous substitution of shared polymorphic sites among self-incompatibility alleles of Solanaceae.

Authors:  A G Clark; T H Kao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Estimation of selection intensity under overdominance by Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Erkan Ozge Buzbas; Paul Joyce; Zaid Abdo
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-06-30

9.  Gene and allelic genealogies at a gametophytic self-incompatibility locus.

Authors:  X Vekemans; M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Diversification of porcine MHC class II genes: evidence for selective advantage.

Authors:  Erin S Luetkemeier; Ripan S Malhi; Jonathan E Beever; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.