| Literature DB >> 31066015 |
Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling1, Torben Harsløf1, Bente Langdahl2.
Abstract
In patients with osteoporosis and severely reduced bone mass and/or recurring fractures, antiresorptive therapy may not be the optimal first-line treatment. Two recent clinical trials comparing bone-forming treatment with antiresorptive therapy have demonstrated that bone-forming treatment is superior in reducing the fracture risk in patients with severe osteoporosis. All of the currently available bone-forming agents-teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab-increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk; however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only transient. Thus, a bone-forming therapy should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The BMD response to bone-forming treatment is reduced in patients previously treated with antiresorptive drugs; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with antiresorptives seems to be preserved. This review provides an overview of the existing bone-forming therapies for osteoporosis including considerations of sequential and combination therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31066015 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00675-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drugs Aging ISSN: 1170-229X Impact factor: 3.923