Literature DB >> 17241971

Dormancy release of Norway spruce under climatic warming: testing ecophysiological models of bud burst with a whole-tree chamber experiment.

Heikki Hänninen1, Michelle Slaney, Sune Linder.   

Abstract

Ecophysiological models predicting timing of bud burst were tested with data gathered from 40-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trees growing in northern Sweden in whole-tree chambers under climatic conditions predicted to prevail in 2100. Norway spruce trees, with heights between 5 and 7 m, were enclosed in individual chambers that provided a factorial combination of ambient (365 micromol mol-1) or elevated (700 micromol mol-1) atmospheric CO2 concentration, [CO2], and ambient or elevated air temperature. Temperature elevation above ambient ranged from +2.8 degrees C in summer to +5.6 degrees C in winter. Compared with control trees, elevated air temperature hastened bud burst by 2 to 3 weeks, whereas elevated [CO2] had no effect on the timing of bud burst. A simple model based on the assumption that bud rest completion takes place on a fixed calendar day predicted timing of bud burst more accurately than two more complicated models in which bud rest completion is caused by accumulated chilling. Together with some recent studies, the results suggest that, in adult trees, some additional environmental cues besides chilling are required for bud rest completion. Although it appears that these additional factors will protect trees under predicted climatic warming conditions, increased risk of frost damage associated with earlier bud burst cannot be ruled out. Inconsistent and partially anomalous results obtained in the model fitting show that, in addition to phenological data gathered under field conditions, more specific data from growth chamber and greenhouse experiments are needed for further development and testing of the models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17241971     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/27.2.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  8 in total

1.  Environmental controls on the phenology of moths: predicting plasticity and constraint under climate change.

Authors:  Anu Valtonen; Matthew P Ayres; Heikki Roininen; Juha Pöyry; Reima Leinonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Performance of several models for predicting budburst date of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).

Authors:  Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri; Nadine Brisson; Jean Pierre Gaudillere
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Tree leaf out response to temperature: comparing field observations, remote sensing, and a warming experiment.

Authors:  Caroline A Polgar; Richard B Primack; Jeffrey S Dukes; Crystal Schaaf; Zhuosen Wang; Susanne S Hoeppner
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Frost hardiness of tree species is independent of phenology and macroclimatic niche.

Authors:  M Hofmann; H Bruelheide
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Effects of elevated ozone and warming on terpenoid emissions and concentrations of Norway spruce depend on needle phenology and age.

Authors:  Minna Kivimäenpää; Johanna Riikonen; Hanna Valolahti; Häikiö Elina; Jarmo K Holopainen; Toini Holopainen
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.561

6.  Fluorescence measurements show stronger cold inhibition of photosynthetic light reactions in Scots pine compared to Norway spruce as well as during spring compared to autumn.

Authors:  Tapio Linkosalo; Juha Heikkinen; Pertti Pulkkinen; Raisa Mäkipää
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  The epigenetic memory of temperature during embryogenesis modifies the expression of bud burst-related genes in Norway spruce epitypes.

Authors:  Elena Carneros; Igor Yakovlev; Marcos Viejo; Jorunn E Olsen; Carl Gunnar Fossdal
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Plant bioclimatic models in climate change research.

Authors:  Chyi-Rong Chiou; Tung-Yu Hsieh; Chang-Chi Chien
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.787

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.