Literature DB >> 20882390

Environmental controls on the phenology of moths: predicting plasticity and constraint under climate change.

Anu Valtonen1, Matthew P Ayres, Heikki Roininen, Juha Pöyry, Reima Leinonen.   

Abstract

Ecological systems have naturally high interannual variance in phenology. Component species have presumably evolved to maintain appropriate phenologies under historical climates, but cases of inappropriate phenology can be expected with climate change. Understanding controls on phenology permits predictions of ecological responses to climate change. We studied phenological control systems in Lepidoptera by analyzing flight times recorded at a network of sites in Finland. We evaluated the strength and form of controls from temperature and photoperiod, and tested for geographic variation within species. Temperature controls on phenology were evident in 51% of 112 study species and for a third of those thermal controls appear to be modified by photoperiodic cues. For 24% of the total, photoperiod by itself emerged as the most likely control system. Species with thermal control alone should be most immediately responsive in phenology to climate warming, but variably so depending upon the minimum temperature at which appreciable development occurs and the thermal responsiveness of development rate. Photoperiodic modification of thermal controls constrains phenotypic responses in phenologies to climate change, but can evolve to permit local adaptation. Our results suggest that climate change will alter the phenological structure of the Finnish Lepidoptera community in ways that are predictable with knowledge of the proximate physiological controls. Understanding how phenological controls in Lepidoptera compare to that of their host plants and enemies could permit general inferences regarding climatic effects on mid- to high-latitude ecosystems.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882390     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1789-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  30 in total

1.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Regulation of diapause.

Authors:  David L Denlinger
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  An improved model for determining degree-day values from daily temperature data.

Authors:  C Cesaraccio; D Spano; P Duce; R L Snyder
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Plant science. Phenology under global warming.

Authors:  Christian Körner; David Basler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change.

Authors:  Charles G Willis; Brad Ruhfel; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change.

Authors:  Eric Post; Mads C Forchhammer; M Syndonia Bret-Harte; Terry V Callaghan; Torben R Christensen; Bo Elberling; Anthony D Fox; Olivier Gilg; David S Hik; Toke T Høye; Rolf A Ims; Erik Jeppesen; David R Klein; Jesper Madsen; A David McGuire; Søren Rysgaard; Daniel E Schindler; Ian Stirling; Mikkel P Tamstorf; Nicholas J C Tyler; Rene van der Wal; Jeffrey Welker; Philip A Wookey; Niels Martin Schmidt; Peter Aastrup
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Plasticity in life-history traits.

Authors:  S Nylin; K Gotthard
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  Sequential diets, metabolic costs, and growth of Spodoptera eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) feeding upon dill, lima bean, and cabbage.

Authors:  J Mark Scriber
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology.

Authors:  M E Visser; L J Holleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Host plant and latitude-related diapause variation in Rhagoletis pomonella: a test for multifaceted life history adaptation on different stages of diapause development.

Authors:  H R Dambroski; J L Feder
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  9 in total

1.  Latitudinal variation in diapause duration and post-winter development in two pierid butterflies in relation to phenological specialization.

Authors:  Diana Posledovich; Tenna Toftegaard; Christer Wiklund; Johan Ehrlén; Karl Gotthard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Extended season for northern butterflies.

Authors:  Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Phenotypic plasticity alone cannot explain climate-induced change in avian migration timing.

Authors:  Josh Buskirk; Robert S Mulvihill; Robert C Leberman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Cues and the optimal timing of activities under environmental changes.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Zoltan Barta; Marcel Klaassen; Silke Bauer
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Marked reduction in demographic rates and reduced fitness advantage for early breeding is not linked to reduced thermal matching of breeding time.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Acceleration of phenological advance and warming with latitude over the past century.

Authors:  Eric Post; Byron A Steinman; Michael E Mann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.

Authors:  James R Bell; Marc S Botham; Peter A Henrys; David I Leech; James W Pearce-Higgins; Chris R Shortall; Tom M Brereton; Jon Pickup; Stephen J Thackeray
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Age-specific responses to spring temperature in a migratory songbird: older females attempt more broods in warmer springs.

Authors:  L Bulluck; S Huber; C Viverette; C Blem
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Phenological responses of 215 moth species to interannual climate variation in the Pacific Northwest from 1895 through 2013.

Authors:  Julie A Maurer; Jon H Shepard; Lars G Crabo; Paul C Hammond; Richard S Zack; Merrill A Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.