Literature DB >> 25740149

Frost hardiness of tree species is independent of phenology and macroclimatic niche.

M Hofmann1, H Bruelheide.   

Abstract

The differences in timing in bud burst between species have been interpreted as an adaptation to late frost events in spring. Thus, it has been suggested that the degree of frost susceptibility of leaves is species-specific and depends on the species' phenology and geographic distribution range. To test for relationships between frost tolerance and phenology as well as between frost tolerance and distribution range across Central European tree species, we studied the frost hardiness of closed buds before bud burst and of freshly opened buds at the time of bud burst. We hypothesized that species with early bud burst and species distributed in eastern and northern areas were more frost tolerant than species with late bud burst and species distributed in western and southern areas. Frost hardiness was estimated by exposing twigs to 11 frost temperatures between -4 °C and -80 °C and by assessing tissue damage by the electrolyte leakage method. In contrast to our hypotheses, neither frost hardiness of closed buds nor frost hardiness of freshly opened buds were related to any variable describing species' macroclimatic niche. Furthermore, frost hardiness of freshly opened buds did not differ among species. Thus, the investigated species with early bud burst take higher risks of frost damage than the species with late bud bursts. These findings indicate that frost hardiness might not play the key role in limiting the geographic distribution ranges previously anticipated.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740149     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-015-9505-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  24 in total

1.  Winter climate change: a critical factor for temperate vegetation performance.

Authors:  Juergen Kreyling
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  A semi-physiological model of cold hardening and dehardening in walnut stem.

Authors:  Magalie Poirier; André Lacointe; Thierry Améglio
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; Paul L Drake; Ray H Froend
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress.

Authors:  Erwin H Beck; Sebastian Fettig; Claudia Knake; Katja Hartig; Tribikram Bhattarai
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Climate and land use change impacts on plant distributions in Germany.

Authors:  Sven Pompe; Jan Hanspach; Franz Badeck; Stefan Klotz; Wilfried Thuiller; Ingolf Kühn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Cold Resistance and Injury in Woody Plants: Knowledge of hardy plant adaptations to freezing stress may help us to reduce winter damage.

Authors:  C J Weiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Foliar temperature tolerance of temperate and tropical evergreen rain forest trees of Australia.

Authors:  S C Cunningham; J Read
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Plant resistance to cold stress: mechanisms and environmental signals triggering frost hardening and dehardening.

Authors:  Erwin H Beck; Richard Heim; Jens Hansen
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Leaf osmotic potential of Eucalyptus hybrids responds differently to freezing and drought, with little clonal variation.

Authors:  Andrew N Callister; Stefan K Arndt; Peter K Ades; Andrew Merchant; Douglas Rowell; Mark A Adams
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Frost resistance and ice nucleation in leaves of five woody timberline species measured in situ during shoot expansion.

Authors:  D Taschler; B Beikircher; G Neuner
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.196

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cold tolerance in the genus Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jessica J Armstrong; Naoki Takebayashi; Diana E Wolf
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 2.  Rethinking false spring risk.

Authors:  Catherine J Chamberlain; Benjamin I Cook; Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri; Elizabeth M Wolkovich
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 10.863

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.