Literature DB >> 17235616

Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy - a prospective study.

W Y Cheung1, D Arvinte, Y W Wong, K D K Luk, K M C Cheung.   

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a common clinical problem. No study has examined the pattern of neurological recovery after surgical decompression. We conducted a prospective study on the pattern of neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy and requiring surgical decompression from January 1995 to December 2000 were prospectively included. Upper limbs, lower limbs and sphincter functions were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Assessment was done before the operation, at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and then yearly after surgery. Results were analysed with the t-test. Differences with P-values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Fifty-five patients were included. The average follow-up period was 53 months. Thirty-nine patients (71%) had neurological improvement after the operation with a mean recovery rate of 55%. The JOA score improved after surgery, reaching statistical significance at 3 months and a plateau at 6 months. Thirty-six patients (65%) had improvement of upper limb function. Twenty-four patients (44%) had improvement of lower limb function. Eleven patients (20%) had improvement of sphincter function. The recovery rate of upper limb function was 37%, of lower limb function was 23% and of sphincter function was 17%. Surgical decompression worked well in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Seventy-one percent of patients had neurological improvement after the operation. The neurological recovery reached a plateau at 6 months after the operation. The upper limb function had the best recovery, followed by lower limb and sphincter functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17235616      PMCID: PMC2269013          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0315-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity.

Authors:  C J Chen; R K Lyu; S T Lee; Y C Wong; L J Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Factors affecting the surgical results of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Sung Soo Chung; Chong Suh Lee; Kwang Hoon Chung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Effects of surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients > or = 70 years of age: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Takao Homma; Yoshikazu Chiba; Toru Hirano; Kei Watanabe; Akiyoshi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-12

4.  Relationships between sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and morphology of the spinal cord and clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with expansive laminoplasty.

Authors:  Mamoru Kawakami; Tetsuya Tamaki; Muneharu Ando; Hiroshi Yamada; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-10

5.  Spasticity, strength, and gait changes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a case report.

Authors:  J R Engsberg; Carl Lauryssen; S A Ross; John H Hollman; David Walker; F J Wippold
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years.

Authors:  E Wada; S Suzuki; A Kanazawa; T Matsuoka; S Miyamoto; K Yonenobu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  C C Edwards; J G Heller; D H Silcox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Rapid opening and closing of the hand as a measure of early neurologic recovery in the upper extremity after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Krishna Prabhu; K Srinivas Babu; Sony Samuel; Ari G Chacko
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The prognosis of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. An analysis of the factors involved.

Authors:  K Fujiwara; K Yonenobu; S Ebara; K Yamashita; K Ono
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences.

Authors:  Tomosato Yamazaki; Kiyoyuki Yanaka; Hiroaki Sato; Kazuya Uemura; Atsuro Tsukada; Tadao Nose
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  21 in total

1.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: focusing on the quantitative signal intensity.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Fan Tao Meng; Shuai Wang; Lin Feng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests.

Authors:  Hugues Pascal Moussellard; Alain Meyer; David Biot; Frédéric Khiami; Elhadi Sariali
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  K Y Wang; O Idowu; C B Thompson; G Orman; C Myers; L H Riley; J A Carrino; A Flammang; W Gilson; C L Sadowsky; I Izbudak
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Kumbhar Kartik Revanappa; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative outcome analysis of lateral mass fixation and trans-facet fixation with posterior decompression in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: An institutional experience.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar Singh; Vijay Kumar; Kuldeep Yadav; Kaif Mohammad; Prevesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Tandem spinal stenosis: a case of stenotic cauda equina syndrome following cervical decompression and fusion for spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

7.  Cervical myelopathy due to single level prolapsed disc and spondylosis: a comparative study on outcome between two groups.

Authors:  Jong-Seon Ryu; Jong-Woo Chae; Woo-Jin Cho; Han Chang; Myung-Sang Moon; Sung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is the Neck Disability Index an Appropriate Measure for Changes in Physical Function After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Authors:  Dhruv K C Goyal; Hamadi A Murphy; Douglas A Hollern; Srikanth N Divi; Kristen Nicholson; Christie Stawicki; I David Kaye; Gregory D Schroeder; Barrett I Woods; Mark F Kurd; Jeffrey A Rihn; D Greg Anderson; Christopher K Kepler; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristen E Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

9.  Design of Lamifuse: a randomised, multi-centre controlled trial comparing laminectomy without or with dorsal fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  Ronald Hma Bartels; André L M Verbeek; J André Grotenhuis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Ling-DE Kong; Ling-Chen Meng; Lin-Feng Wang; Yong Shen; Pan Wang; Zi-Kun Shang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.