Literature DB >> 12493108

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences.

Tomosato Yamazaki1, Kiyoyuki Yanaka, Hiroaki Sato, Kazuya Uemura, Atsuro Tsukada, Tadao Nose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A variety of factors may affect the surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic factors by comparing younger and elderly patient groups on the basis of preoperative radiological and clinical data.
METHODS: To assess the prognostic factors after surgery had been performed, the clinical and radiological data of 64 patients who underwent expansive laminoplasty were reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups, a younger patient group (<65 yr of age; n = 29) and an elderly patient group (>/=65 yr of age; n = 35). The neurological status of the patients was assessed by use of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale. Radiological features were examined with computed tomographic myelography and magnetic resonance imaging. The effects of the clinical and radiological findings on neurological outcome were investigated.
RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores in elderly patients were significantly lower than those in younger patients. For elderly patients, the transverse area of the spinal cord at the level of maximum compression and symptom duration were the factors that predicted an excellent recovery. In contrast, the transverse area was the only predictor of excellent recovery in younger patients. Age, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, canal diameter, and an intensity change on the spinal cord were not predictive in either age range.
CONCLUSION: The transverse area of the spinal cord may be a reliable predictor of excellent recovery in both younger and elderly patient groups. Shorter symptom duration was an important factor in the excellent recovery of elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12493108     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200301000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  39 in total

1.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a complex problem where approach is patient dependent.

Authors:  Rob D Dickerman; Ashley S Reynolds; Matthew Bennett
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests.

Authors:  Hugues Pascal Moussellard; Alain Meyer; David Biot; Frédéric Khiami; Elhadi Sariali
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08

5.  Association of VDR-FokI and VDBP-Thr420Lys polymorphisms with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A case-control study in the population of China.

Authors:  De-Wei Song; Yu-Dong Wu; Dong-Dong Tian
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  The effects of surgery on locomotion in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Go Yoshida; Tokumi Kanemura; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Zenya Ito; Ryoji Tauchi; Akio Muramoto; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Hideki Nagashima; Toshiyuki Dokai; Hirokazu Hashiguchi; Hiroyuki Ishii; Yasuhiro Kameyama; Yuji Katae; Yasuo Morio; Tsugutake Morishita; Masaaki Murata; Yoshiro Nanjo; Toshiaki Takahashi; Atsushi Tanida; Shinji Tanishima; Koji Yamane; Ryota Teshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Cervical myelopathy as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  A C Arlt; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hans-Ekkehart Vitzthum; Kristina Dalitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Single level cervical disc herniation: A questionnaire based study on current surgical practices.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Yousef Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Pouria Tavakoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.