Literature DB >> 25339727

Processing of simple and complex acoustic signals in a tonotopically organized ear.

Jennifer Hummel1, Konstantin Wolf1, Manfred Kössl1, Manuela Nowotny2.   

Abstract

Processing of complex signals in the hearing organ remains poorly understood. This paper aims to contribute to this topic by presenting investigations on the mechanical and neuronal response of the hearing organ of the tropical bushcricket species Mecopoda elongata to simple pure tone signals as well as to the conspecific song as a complex acoustic signal. The high-frequency hearing organ of bushcrickets, the crista acustica (CA), is tonotopically tuned to frequencies between about 4 and 70 kHz. Laser Doppler vibrometer measurements revealed a strong and dominant low-frequency-induced motion of the CA when stimulated with either pure tone or complex stimuli. Consequently, the high-frequency distal area of the CA is more strongly deflected by low-frequency-induced waves than by high-frequency-induced waves. This low-frequency dominance will have strong effects on the processing of complex signals. Therefore, we additionally studied the neuronal response of the CA to native and frequency-manipulated chirps. Again, we found a dominant influence of low-frequency components within the conspecific song, indicating that the mechanical vibration pattern highly determines the neuronal response of the sensory cells. Thus, we conclude that the encoding of communication signals is modulated by ear mechanics.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tettigoniidae; bushcricket; crista acustica; electrophysiology; insect hearing; laser Doppler vibrometry

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339727      PMCID: PMC4213652          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata.

Authors:  Heiner Römer; Berthold Hedwig; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Neuroethology of female preference in the synchronously singing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera): why do followers call at all?

Authors:  Ismene Fertschai; Jürgen Stradner; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Biomechanical and neurophysiological studies on audition in eared and earless harlequin frogs (Atelopus).

Authors:  E D Lindquist; T E Hetherington; S F Volman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Stimulus transmission in the auditory receptor organs of the foreleg of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae) I. The role of the tympana.

Authors:  M Bangert; K Kalmring; T Sickmann; R Stephen; M Jatho; R Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spatial organization of tettigoniid auditory receptors: insights from neuronal tracing.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Gerlind U C Lehmann; Arne W Lehmann; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Synchrony during acoustic interactions in the bushcricket Mecopoda 'Chirper' (Tettigoniidae:Orthoptera) is generated by a combination of chirp-by-chirp resetting and change in intrinsic chirp rate.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera).

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Silvia Kratzer; Klaus Steiner; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Tonotopically arranged traveling waves in the miniature hearing organ of bushcrickets.

Authors:  Arun Palghat Udayashankar; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.