Literature DB >> 2781236

The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

J T Ovaska1, H J Järvinen, J P Mecklin.   

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of a follow-up programme after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma, a 10-year series of 402 patients was surveyed for the detection rate of potentially curative recurrences and metachronous neoplasms. There were 120 recurrences (30%), and 100 of them (83%) were detected at scheduled check ups. Initial suspicion of recurrence was most often based on physical examination, carcinoembryonic antigen assay, or sigmoidoscopy. Reoperation was undertaken in 62 patients, in 26 cases (22%) for cure. The 5-year survival was 48% after curative reoperations. Metachronous adenomas and carcinomas occurred in 38 and 11 patients, respectively, giving corresponding cumulative 5-year incidences of 13% and 3.8%. Altogether, 37 patients (9.2%) had a curative reoperation for recurrent or metachronous carcinoma, and a further 38 patients (9.5%) had adenomas removed by polypectomy. It is concluded that regular follow-up is useful for the patients, and the follow-up schedule must be planned to detect both early recurrences and metachronous neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2781236     DOI: 10.3109/00365528909093068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  11 in total

1.  [Individual risk-related after-care in colorectal cancer?].

Authors:  B Böhm; J Osswald; H P Hucke; W Stock
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jeffery; Brigid E Hickey; Phil N Hider; Adrienne M See
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-24

3.  Long-term follow-up of patients with malignant pedunculated colon polyps after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Liviu V Titu; Anthony A Nicholson; John E Hartley; David J Breen; John R T Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cost and effectiveness of follow-up examinations in patients with colorectal cancer resected for cure in a French population-based study.

Authors:  Frédéric Borie; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Bertrand Millat; Brigitte Trétarre
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  D J Bruinvels; A M Stiggelbout; J Kievit; H C van Houwelingen; J D Habbema; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cost-effectiveness of two follow-up strategies for curative resection of colorectal cancer: comparative study using a Markov model.

Authors:  Frédéric Borie; Christophe Combescure; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Brigitte Trétarre; Bertrand Millat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R A Audisio; P Setti-Carraro; M Segala; D Capko; B Andreoni; G Tiberio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jeffery; Brigid E Hickey; Phillip N Hider
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 10.  Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Bethany Shinkins; Indika Pathiraja; Nia W Roberts; Tim J James; Susan Mallett; Rafael Perera; John N Primrose; David Mant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.