Literature DB >> 17229828

What does the brain do when you fake it? An FMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping.

G Króliczak1, C Cavina-Pratesi, D A Goodman, J C Culham.   

Abstract

Given that studying neural bases of actions is very challenging with fMRI, numerous experiments have used pantomimed actions as a proxy to studying neural circuits of real actions. However, the underlying assumption that the same neural mechanisms mediate real and pantomimed actions has never been directly tested. Moreover, the assumption is called into question by neuropsychological evidence suggesting that real actions depend on the dorsal stream of visual processing whereas pretend actions also recruit the ventral stream. Here, we directly tested these ideas in neurologically intact subjects. Ten right-handed participants performed four tasks: 1) grasping real three-dimensional objects, 2) reaching toward the objects and touching them with the knuckle without hand preshaping, 3) pantomimed grasping in an adjacent location where no object was present, and 4) pantomimed reaching toward an adjacent location. As expected, in the anterior intraparietal area, there was significantly higher activation during real grasping than that during real reaching. However, the activation difference between pantomimed grasping and pantomimed reaching did not reach statistical significance. There was also no effect of pantomimed grasping within the ventral stream, including an object-selective area in the lateral occipital cortex. Instead, we found that pantomimed grasping was mediated by right-hemisphere activation, particularly the right parietal cortex. These results suggest that areas typically invoked by real actions may not necessarily be driven by "fake" actions. Moreover, pantomimed grasping may not tap object-related areas within the ventral stream, but rather may rely on mechanisms within the right hemisphere that are recruited by artificial and less practiced actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17229828     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00778.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Disparity level identification using the voxel-wise Gabor model of fMRI data.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Chunping Hou; Li Yao; Chuncheng Zhang; Hongna Zheng; Jiacai Zhang; Zhiying Long
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback.

Authors:  Prajith Sivakumar; Derek J Quinlan; Kevin M Stubbs; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand shape selection in pantomimed grasping: interaction between the dorsal and the ventral visual streams and convergence on the ventral premotor area.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yoshiaki Someya; Seiji Ogawa; Yoshihiro Takayama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Emotion modulates allocentric but not egocentric stimulus localization: implications for dual visual systems perspectives.

Authors:  James H Kryklywy; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Doriana De Marco; Marianna Busiello; Francesca Ferri; Marcello Costantini; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Stephen R Arnott; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Synchrony of the Reach and the Grasp in pantomime reach-to-grasp.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.