Literature DB >> 17229596

Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.

Jin Luo1, Daniel M Skrzypiec, Phillip Pollintine, Michael A Adams, Deborah J Annesley-Williams, Patricia Dolan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can be treated by injecting bone cement into the damaged vertebral body. "Vertebroplasty" is becoming popular but the procedure has yet to be optimised. This study compared the ability of two different types of cement to restore the spine's mechanical properties following fracture, and it examined how the mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty depends on bone mineral density (BMD), fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
METHODS: A pair of thoracolumbar "motion-segments" (two adjacent vertebrae with intervening soft tissue) was obtained from each of 15 cadavers, aged 51-91 years. Specimens were loaded to induce vertebral fracture; then one of each pair underwent vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, the other with another composite material (Cortoss). Specimens were creep loaded for 2 h to allow consolidation. At each stage of the experiment, motion segment stiffness in bending and compression was measured, and the distribution of compressive loading on the vertebrae was investigated by pulling a miniature pressure transducer through the intervertebral disc. Pressure measurements, repeated in flexed and extended postures, indicated the intradiscal pressure (IDP) and neural arch compressive load-bearing (F(N)). BMD was measured using DXA. Fracture severity was quantified from height loss.
RESULTS: Vertebral fracture reduced motion segment stiffness in bending and compression, by 31% and 43% respectively (p<0.001). IDP fell by 43-62%, depending on posture (p<0.001), whereas F(N) increased from 14% to 37% of the applied load in flexion, and from 39% to 61% in extension (p<0.001). Vertebroplasty partially reversed all these effects, and the restoration of load-sharing was usually sustained after creep-consolidation. No differences were observed between PMMA and Cortoss. Pooled results from 30 specimens showed that low BMD was associated with increased fracture severity (in terms of height loss) and with greater changes in stiffness and load-sharing following fracture. Specimens with low BMD and more severe fractures also showed the greatest mechanical changes following vertebroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Low vertebral BMD leads to greater changes in stiffness and spinal load-sharing following fracture. Restoration of mechanical function following vertebroplasty is little influenced by cement type but may be greater in people with low BMD who suffer more severe fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17229596     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  18 in total

1.  Vertebroplasty Using Calcium Triglyceride Bone Cement (Kryptonite™) for Vertebral Compression Fractures. A Single-Centre Preliminary Study of Outcomes at One-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Gianluigi Guarnieri; Mario Tecame; Roberto Izzo; Pasquale Vassallo; Angela Sardaro; Francesca Iasiello; Carlo Cavaliere; Mario Muto
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Micromechanics of the human vertebral body for forward flexion.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Shashank Nawathe; Aaron J Fields; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Augmentation improves human cadaveric vertebral body compression mechanics for lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; Joshua D Auerbach; Philip M Maurer; Erik M Erbe; Dean Entrekin; Richard A Balderston; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Secondary balloon kyphoplasty for new vertebral compression fracture after initial single-level balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Dawei Song; Bin Meng; Guangdong Chen; Junjie Niu; Weimin Jiang; Zongping Luo; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

7.  Comparison of failure mechanisms for cements used in skeletal luting applications.

Authors:  O Clarkin; D Boyd; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Kolb; Rebecca A Kueny; Klaus Püschel; Andreas Boger; Johannes M Rueger; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.