Literature DB >> 17227814

Superiority of the Lyon schuss view over the standing anteroposterior view for detecting joint space narrowing, especially in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment, in early knee osteoarthritis.

F Merle-Vincent1, E Vignon, K Brandt, M Piperno, F Coury-Lucas, T Conrozier, P Mathieu, M P Hellio Le Graverand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of using the conventional anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the knee in order to identify joint space narrowing (JSN) at an early stage of osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: Grading of JSN using a 0-5 score and quantitative measurement of joint space width (JSW) of the medial and lateral compartments of the tibiofemoral joint in AP and fluoroscopically assisted posteroanterior Lyon schuss (LS) radiographs of 202 patients with knee OA.
RESULTS: Knees without definite JSN (score <2) were twice as common in AP than in LS radiographs (36.1% vs 18.8%). The number of knees showing definite medial JSN was identical in both views but four knees showing a medial OA in AP view were classified differently in the LS radiographs (three bicompartmental OA and one lateral OA). The frequency of lateral JSN was approximately twice as great in the LS view as in the AP view. JSN score was significantly higher (p<0.001) and JSW was significantly smaller (p<0.01) in the LS view than in the AP view. In knees with definite JSN, JSW of the compartment with no narrowing was significantly (p<0.04) larger than in knees that did not exhibit definite JSN. Medial JSW and lateral JSW were inversely correlated (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The standing AP radiograph performed poorly in identifying both the location of JSN in patients with early tibiofemoral OA (especially, lateral OA) and the severity of JSN. The LS radiographs are preferable to standing AP views for the selection of patients for therapeutic trials of structure-modifying OA drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227814      PMCID: PMC1954644          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.056481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  34 in total

1.  Anteroposterior weight-bearing radiography of the knee with both knees in semiflexion, using new equipment.

Authors:  S Inoue; R Nagamine; H Miura; K Urabe; S Matsuda; K Sakaki; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  The longterm outcome of osteoarthritis: rates and predictors of joint space narrowing in symptomatic patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Supplementary vitamin E does not affect the loss of cartilage volume in knee osteoarthritis: a 2 year double blind randomized placebo controlled study.

Authors:  Anita E Wluka; Stephen Stuckey; Caroline Brand; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views.

Authors:  Eric Vignon; Muriel Piperno; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Steven A Mazzuca; Kenneth D Brandt; Pierre Mathieu; Huguett Favret; Martine Vignon; Florence Merle-Vincent; Thierry Conrozier
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-02

5.  Glucosamine sulfate use and delay of progression of knee osteoarthritis: a 3-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  Karel Pavelká; Jindriska Gatterová; Marta Olejarová; Stanislav Machacek; Giampaolo Giacovelli; Lucio C Rovati
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-14

6.  Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; L C Rovati; R L Lee; E Lejeune; O Bruyere; G Giacovelli; Y Henrotin; J E Dacre; C Gossett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  3-Foot standing AP versus 45 degrees PA radiograph for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  G F Dervin; R J Feibel; K Rody; J Grabowski
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Y Nagaosa; P Lanyon; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  Anita E Wluka; Stephen Stuckey; Judith Snaddon; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-08

10.  High prevalence of lateral knee osteoarthritis in Beijing Chinese compared with Framingham Caucasian subjects.

Authors:  David T Felson; Michael C Nevitt; Yuqing Zhang; Piran Aliabadi; Bridget Baumer; Daniel Gale; Wei Li; Wei Yu; Ling Xu
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-05
View more
  13 in total

1.  Cross-sectional comparison of extended anteroposterior and posteroanterior fixed flexion positioning to assess radiographic osteoarthritis at the knee: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Amanda E Nelson; Jordan B Renner; Xiaoyan A Shi; Jack H Shreffler; Todd A Schwartz; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Magnitude and regional distribution of cartilage loss associated with grades of joint space narrowing in radiographic osteoarthritis--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  F Eckstein; W Wirth; D J Hunter; A Guermazi; C K Kwoh; D R Nelson; O Benichou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  Cartilage repair and joint preservation: medical and surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Henning Madry; Ulrich Wolfgang Grün; Gunnar Knutsen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Spatial patterns of cartilage loss in the medial femoral condyle in osteoarthritic knees: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wirth; Olivier Benichou; C Kent Kwoh; Ali Guermazi; David Hunter; Reinhard Putz; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Evaluation of a dynamic bayesian belief network to predict osteoarthritic knee pain using data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Emily W Watt; Emily Watt; Alex A T Bui; Alex At Bui
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

7.  A new quantitative measure for radiologic osteoarthritis of the lateral knee compartment distinguishes patients with longstanding lateral meniscectomy from non-pathological knees.

Authors:  Esther Weber; Daniel Theisen; Philippe Wilmes; Jacques Menetrey; Christophe Hulet; Romain Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Direct comparison of fixed flexion, radiography and MRI in knee osteoarthritis: responsiveness data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  W Wirth; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; M R John; M Nevitt; R J Buck; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Is end-stage lateral osteoarthritic knee always valgus? Mechanical alignment analysis and radiographic severity assessment.

Authors:  Su Chan Lee; Viral Gondalia; Byoung Yoon Hwang; Hye Sun Ahn; Choon Key Lee; David J Hunter; Kwang Am Jung
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-06-03

10.  The Combination of the Tunnel View and Weight-Bearing Anteroposterior Radiographs Improves the Detection of Knee Arthritis.

Authors:  Oladapo M Babatunde; Jonathan R Danoff; David A Patrick; Jonathan H Lee; Jonathan K Kazam; William Macaulay
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2016-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.