Literature DB >> 27026028

A new quantitative measure for radiologic osteoarthritis of the lateral knee compartment distinguishes patients with longstanding lateral meniscectomy from non-pathological knees.

Esther Weber1, Daniel Theisen2, Philippe Wilmes3, Jacques Menetrey4, Christophe Hulet5, Romain Seil6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Common radiologic scores to evaluate knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been widely used but are descriptive and may lack objectivity. The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative and objective radiologic measure for the evaluation of lateral knee compartment OA. Furthermore, we tested the reliability of this new measure and its correlation to well-accepted radiologic scores.
METHODS: This retrospective study was performed within the context of a multi-centre long-term follow-up (15-25 years) of a patient cohort after partial or total lateral meniscectomy (n = 36 knees). In addition, 99 radiographs of clinically and radiologically normal knees were obtained from a control group. Anteroposterior weight-bearing views (0°) and Schuss (45°) views were analysed. The joint height of the lateral knee compartment was measured on the lateral border (lateral joint space height) and in the centre (central joint space height, CJSH) and normalized with respect to the width of the lateral compartment (X). All measurements were taken independently by two observers, allowing for inter- and intra-observer reliability assessments. The results of the two groups were compared using an analysis of covariance. Finally, the correlations between the results and the Fairbank and Kellgren & Lawrence scores were determined using a Spearman ρ rank order correlation.
RESULTS: The normalized joint space height in the centre of the compartment on the Schuss view (CJSH/X) showed the highest intra- (ICC = 0.980) and inter-observer reliability (ICC = 0.982). There was a significant difference in CJSH/X between the control (0.19 ± 0.05) and the meniscectomized knees (0.08 ± 0.07) (p < 0.001). CJSH/X showed a significant decline of 11 % per 10 years in the meniscectomy group. A negative correlation could be found between CJSH/X and the Fairbank (ρ = -0.751; p < 0.001) and Kellgren &amp; Lawrence scores (ρ = -0.712; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 0.14 of CJSH/X was defined-representing one standard deviation below the mean of the control group-from which measurements were considered as pathologic.
CONCLUSION: The normalized joint space height measured in the centre of the lateral knee compartment from a Schuss view, CJSH/X, was highly reproducible and showed a significant correlation to established radiologic scores. This new measure has the advantage of being objective and dimensionless and thus independent of the size of the radiograph. The normative values provided by our healthy control knees are useful to help establish an early diagnosis of radiologic lateral knee compartment OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective diagnostic study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint space height; Lateral meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026028     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4084-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis in population studies: whither Kellgren and Lawrence?

Authors:  T D Spector; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Assessment of the radioanatomic positioning of the osteoarthritic knee in serial radiographs: comparison of three acquisition techniques.

Authors:  M-P H Le Graverand; S Mazzuca; M Lassere; A Guermazi; E Pickering; K Brandt; C Peterfy; G Cline; M Nevitt; T Woodworth; P Conaghan; E Vignon
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 4.  Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D Schiphof; M Boers; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Defining radiographic incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis: suggested modifications of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale.

Authors:  David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Ali Guermazi; Burton Sack; Piran Aliabadi
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  3-Foot standing AP versus 45 degrees PA radiograph for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  G F Dervin; R J Feibel; K Rody; J Grabowski
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration.

Authors:  K D Brandt; R S Fife; E M Braunstein; B Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1991-11

8.  Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation.

Authors:  Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  [Imaging and preoperative planning of osteotomy of tibial head osteotomy].

Authors:  D Pape; R Seil; F Adam; S Rupp; D Kohn; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Kellgren & Lawrence grade 1 osteophytes in the knee--doubtful or definite?

Authors:  D J Hart; T D Spector
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.