Literature DB >> 17226900

Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Stefan Boeck1, Axel Hinke, Ralf Wilkowski, Volker Heinemann.   

Abstract

Despite progress in the treatment of advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), the outcome of this disease remains dismal for the majority of patients. Given the moderate efficacy of treatment, prognostic factors may help to guide treatment decisions. Several trials identified baseline performance status as an important prognostic factor for survival. Unfit patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) below 70% only have a marginal benefit from chemotherapy with gemcitabine (Gem) and may often benefit more from optimal supportive care. Once, however, the decision is taken to apply chemotherapy, KPS may be used to select either mono- or combination chemotherapy. Patients with a good performance status (KPS = 90%-100%) may have a significant and clinically relevant survival benefit from combination chemotherapy. By contrast, patients with a poor performance status (KPS < or = 80%) have no advantage from intensified therapy and should rather receive single-agent treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17226900      PMCID: PMC4065949          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i2.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  12 in total

1.  Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; Marcel C Machado; Dalia Wajsbrot; Roberto Abramoff; Paulo M Hoff; Jacques Tabacof; Artur Katz; Sergio D Simon; René C Gansl
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2002

2.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy.

Authors:  H Ishii; S Okada; H Nose; M Yoshimori; K Aoki; T Okusaka
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  An investigational new drug treatment program for patients with gemcitabine: results for over 3000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A M Storniolo; N H Enas; C A Brown; M Voi; M L Rothenberg; R Schilsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

Authors:  C Louvet; R Labianca; P Hammel; G Lledo; M G Zampino; T André; A Zaniboni; M Ducreux; E Aitini; J Taïeb; R Faroux; C Lepere; A de Gramont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Detlef Quietzsch; Frank Gieseler; Michael Gonnermann; Herbert Schönekäs; Andreas Rost; Horst Neuhaus; Caroline Haag; Michael Clemens; Bernard Heinrich; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Martin Fuchs; Doris Fleckenstein; Wolfgang Gesierich; Dirk Uthgenannt; Hermann Einsele; Axel Holstege; Axel Hinke; Andreas Schalhorn; Ralf Wilkowski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cytokines in pancreatic carcinoma: correlation with phenotypic characteristics and prognosis.

Authors:  Behnam Ebrahimi; Susan L Tucker; Donghui Li; James L Abbruzzese; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; H van de Velde; P Karasek; H Oettle; W L Vervenne; A Szawlowski; P Schoffski; S Post; C Verslype; H Neumann; H Safran; Y Humblet; J Perez Ruixo; Y Ma; D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a comparative analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Akira Sawaki; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kuniyuki Takahashi; Tsuneya Nakamura; Tatsuya Ioka; Sachiko Tanaka; Akihiko Nakaizumi; Ahmed As Salem; Ryuzo Ueda; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  CA19-9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials.

Authors:  N R Maisey; A R Norman; A Hill; A Massey; J Oates; D Cunningham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

1.  Triple approach strategy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Giardino; Roberto Girelli; Isabella Frigerio; Paolo Regi; Maurizio Cantore; Auriemma Alessandra; Annita Lusenti; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Gemcitabine combined with gum mastic causes potent growth inhibition and apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Xin-yu Huang; Hong-cheng Wang; Zhou Yuan; Ang Li; Mei-lan He; Kai-xing Ai; Qi Zheng; Huan-long Qin
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Predictive Value of Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for Early Mortality in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro L S Usón Junior; Donato Callegaro-Filho; Diogo D G Bugano; Fernando Moura; Fernando C Maluf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-12

4.  Sequential gemcitabine and platinum versus first-line combination of gemcitabine and platinum for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jhe-Cyuan Guo; Shih-Hung Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Gemcitabine in Combination with a Second Cytotoxic Agent in the First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wei Zhang; Yu-Xiang Ma; Yang Sun; Yu-Bo Cao; Qin Li; Chong-An Xu
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303).

Authors:  Hedy Lee Kindler; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Susan Sutherland; Deborah Schrag; Herbert Hurwitz; Federico Innocenti; Mary Frances Mulcahy; Eileen O'Reilly; Timothy F Wozniak; Joel Picus; Pankaj Bhargava; Robert J Mayer; Richard L Schilsky; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effects of nutritional and psychological status of the patients with advanced stomach cancer on physical performance status.

Authors:  Jun Tian; Zhen-chun Chen; Li-Fang Hang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Metformin induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Luo-Wei Wang; Zhao-Shen Li; Duo-Wu Zou; Zhen-Dong Jin; Jun Gao; Guo-Ming Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Biglycan expression and clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Aprile; Claudio Avellini; Michele Reni; Micol Mazzer; Luisa Foltran; Diego Rossi; Stefano Cereda; Emiliana Iaiza; Gianpiero Fasola; Andrea Piga
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-09-25

Review 10.  [Rational imaging of metastasized tumor diseases].

Authors:  H J Stemmler; M Schlemmer; S Reilich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.