Literature DB >> 17225428

Perceptual adaptation by normally hearing listeners to a simulated "hole" in hearing.

Matthew W Smith1, Andrew Faulkner.   

Abstract

Simulations of cochlear implants have demonstrated that the deleterious effects of a frequency misalignment between analysis bands and characteristic frequencies at basally shifted simulated electrode locations are significantly reduced with training. However, a distortion of frequency-to-place mapping may also arise due to a region of dysfunctional neurons that creates a "hole" in the tonotopic representation. This study simulated a 10 mm hole in the mid-frequency region. Noise-band processors were created with six output bands (three apical and three basal to the hole). The spectral information that would have been represented in the hole was either dropped or reassigned to bands on either side. Such reassignment preserves information but warps the place code, which may in itself impair performance. Normally hearing subjects received three hours of training in two reassignment conditions. Speech recognition improved considerably with training. Scores were much lower in a baseline (untrained) condition where information from the hole region was dropped. A second group of subjects trained in this dropped condition did show some improvement; however, scores after training were significantly lower than in the reassignment conditions. These results are consistent with the view that speech processors should present the most informative frequency range irrespective of frequency misalignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17225428     DOI: 10.1121/1.2359235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

Review 3.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

4.  Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  On Detectable and Meaningful Speech-Intelligibility Benefits.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; David McShefferty; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Rapid Cortical Adaptation and the Role of Thalamic Synchrony during Wakefulness.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Wright; Peter Y Borden; Yi Juin Liew; Michael F Bolus; William M Stoy; Craig R Forest; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  Lexico-semantic and acoustic-phonetic processes in the perception of noise-vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25

9.  Learning auditory space: generalization and long-term effects.

Authors:  Catarina Mendonça; Guilherme Campos; Paulo Dias; Jorge A Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  David McShefferty; William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.