Literature DB >> 17221249

[The treatment of periprosthetic infections].

C H Lohmann1, M Fürst, O Niggemeyer, W Rüther.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic infections are severe complications following total joint arthroplasty. The infection rate is estimated to be 0.5-2%. Systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and previous surgery are considered risk factors for infection. The infection rate in the present patient cohort was low (0.72%). The recurrence rate (23.4%) is due to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and septic total knee arthroplasties. Successful treatment is dependent on various factors, one of which involves accurate preoperative bacterial diagnostics. Joint fluid aspiration is the appropriate procedure. Open biopsy or arthroscopically guided biopsy can be performed in cases of unclear diagnostic results. Early infection can be treated with thorough joint debridement without exchanging fixed implant components; "low-grade" or late infections require revision with implant removal in a one or two stage septic revision according to clearly determined algorithms. Antibiotic therapy is mandatory, and a combination with rifampicin is a very useful basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221249     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-006-0141-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  24 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection.

Authors:  F S Haddad; S K Muirhead-Allwood; A R Manktelow; I Bacarese-Hamilton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-07

3.  Principles of systemic antimicrobial therapy in foreign material associated infection in bone tissue, with special focus on periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  B L Atkins; N Athanasou; J J Deeks; D W Crook; H Simpson; T E Peto; P McLardy-Smith; A R Berendt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision.

Authors:  R L Barrack; R W Jennings; M W Wolfe; A J Bertot
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Outcome of prosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of medical and surgical therapy in 200 episodes.

Authors:  Elie F Berbari; Douglas R Osmon; Mary C T Duffy; R N William Harmssen; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Arlen D Hanssen; James M Steckelberg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in infection of hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  P J James; I A Butcher; E R Gardner; D L Hamblen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-09

9.  Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Poss; T S Thornhill; F C Ewald; W H Thomas; N J Batte; C B Sledge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Katrin D M Stumpe; Hubert P Nötzli; Marco Zanetti; Ehab M Kamel; Thomas F Hany; Gerhard W Görres; Gustav K von Schulthess; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Allergic reactions as differential diagnosis for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  H Meyer; A Krüger; A Roessner; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Periprosthetic infections following total hip replacement with ESBL-forming bacteria: importance for clinical practice].

Authors:  M Haenle; A Podbielski; M Ellenrieder; R Skripitz; K Arndt; W Mittelmeier; R Bader; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [One-stage revision of knee endoprosthesis due to periprosthetic infection and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome].

Authors:  H-C Schmitz; B Schwantes; D Kendoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Pfitzner; D Krocker; C Perka; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER INFECTED TOTAL KNEE AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Falk Mittag; Carmen Ina Leichtle; Michael Schlumberger; Ulf Gunther Leichtle; Markus Wünschel
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 6.  [Periprosthetic infections in systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease. Review article on diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  U Illgner; A Uekötter; L Bause
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Comparative Analysis of Direct Hospital Care Costs between Aseptic and Two-Stage Septic Knee Revision.

Authors:  Richard Kasch; Sebastian Merk; Grit Assmann; Andreas Lahm; Matthias Napp; Harry Merk; Steffen Flessa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.