Literature DB >> 26997914

CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER INFECTED TOTAL KNEE AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.

Falk Mittag1, Carmen Ina Leichtle1, Michael Schlumberger1, Ulf Gunther Leichtle1, Markus Wünschel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Infection after total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication which typically leads to a long lasting and intensive surgical and medicamentous treatment. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence outcome after revision surgery caused by prosthetic infection.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients who had revision surgery between 1989 and 2009 due to periprosthetic infection. We examined a total of 69 joints (TKA: 36%, THA: 64%), follow-up 5.1 years (0.5-21 years) after the initial surgical intervention. The mean patient age at time of surgery was 67 years old (43-79 years old). Clinical data and scores including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC)-Index, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Hospital for Special Surgery Score (HSS) were surveyed.
RESULTS: There was no difference in clinical scores regarding treatment between a single and a multiple stage treatment regime. Infections with multiple microorganisms and Enterococcus spp. lead to a significantly higher number of interventions. Using a modified Tsukayama system we classified 24% as type I, 34% type II and 42% type III- infections, with no differences in clinical outcome. Overweight patients had a significantly lower HHS and WOMAC-score. Immunosuppression leads to a worse WOMAC and HSS-Score. An increased number of procedures was associated to a limping gait.
CONCLUSION: Thorough surgical technique leads to good clinical results independent of infection-type and treatment philosophy. Level of Evidence III, Case Control Study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Bacteria.; Hip; Infection; Knee

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997914      PMCID: PMC4775489          DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220162401150767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras        ISSN: 1413-7852            Impact factor:   0.513


  20 in total

1.  Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; J J Shine
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term follow-up of cemented total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R Severt; R Wood; A Cracchiolo; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index].

Authors:  G Stucki; D Meier; S Stucki; B A Michel; A G Tyndall; W Dick; R Theiler
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  The often poor clinical outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang; Ting-Wen Huang; Jun-Wen Wang; Han-Shiang Chen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement.

Authors:  J L Cahill; B Shadbolt; J M Scarvell; P N Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study.

Authors:  E F Berbari; A D Hanssen; M C Duffy; J M Steckelberg; D M Ilstrup; W S Harmsen; D R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Geir Hallan; Geir Hallan; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Two-stage reimplantation of infected hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Wun-Schen Chen; Te-Hu Fu; Jun-Wen Wang
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

9.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  Maria Klässbo; Eva Larsson; Eva Mannevik
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Choice and Success of One- Versus Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Infected Hip and Knee Prostheses.

Authors:  Lucas Castellani; Nick Daneman; Samira Mubareka; Richard Jenkinson
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Aberrant subchondral osteoblastic metabolism modifies NaV1.8 for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jianxi Zhu; Gehua Zhen; Senbo An; Xiao Wang; Mei Wan; Yusheng Li; Zhiyong Chen; Yun Guan; Xinzhong Dong; Yihe Hu; Xu Cao
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Bacterial Extracellular DNA Production Is Associated with Outcome of Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Beata Zatorska; Carla Renata Arciola; Nicolas Haffner; Luigi Segagni Lusignani; Elisabeth Presterl; Magda Diab-Elschahawi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.