Literature DB >> 10963167

Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection.

F S Haddad1, S K Muirhead-Allwood, A R Manktelow, I Bacarese-Hamilton.   

Abstract

We treated 50 consecutive patients with infected total hip arthroplasties according to a standard protocol. Previous surgery to eradicate the infection had been attempted in 13 patients and discharging sinuses were present in 20. Aspiration arthrography was routinely carried out before our interventions. The first stage was a meticulous removal of all foreign and potentially infected material. Samples were taken for culture and a thorough lavage carried out. Antibiotic-loaded beads were placed in the femoral shaft and an antibiotic-loaded cement ball in the acetabulum. At the second stage an uncemented arthroplasty was introduced. Bone allograft was used in 18 patients. The interval between procedures was usually three weeks, but this was extended if the wound was slow to heal or there was extensive bony destruction. Appropriate antibiotics were given for three months. At a mean follow-up of 5.8 years the rate of reinfection was 8% (4 patients). Two of these patients have had another, successful, two-stage revision. At this medium-term review, a satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome was obtained in all except two patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963167     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.9668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  46 in total

1.  Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jaiben George; Grzegorz Kwiecien; Alison K Klika; Deepak Ramanathan; Thomas W Bauer; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [The treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  C H Lohmann; M Fürst; O Niggemeyer; W Rüther
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Retention treatment after periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infection.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; Fabian von Knoch; Abdurrahman O Kandil; David Zurakowski; Slade Moore; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

5.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexander Gebhard; Martin Fuerst; Irina Berger; Peter Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Case report: Salmonella infection following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul Y Chong; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

8.  Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.