Literature DB >> 8138307

Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.

M J Curtis1, R H Jinnah, V Wilson, B W Cunningham.   

Abstract

This study assesses the rigidity and strength of fixation provided by intramedullary and extramedullary devices for proximal femoral fractures. Stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures were studied in paired femora after internal fixation with the Gamma nail and Richards 135 degrees classic hip-screw implants; in subtrochanteric fractures, the 95 degrees Richards condylar screw was studied in addition. Subsidence of the sliding screw within the plate and nail constructs was measured. Fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary Gamma nail was significantly stronger and more rigid than that with the extramedullary screw plate devices. Under conditions of simulated protected weight bearing, the 95 degrees condylar screw plate provided more rigid fixation than did the 135 degrees hip screw. There was no significant difference in the strength of fixation of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures between the Gamma nail and the hip screw, although the Gamma nail provided more rigid fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8138307     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90111-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  40 in total

1.  The treatment of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur with a minimally invasive technique using an extramedullary implant MINUS System.

Authors:  Rogério Naim Sawaia; William Dias Belangero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Reduction techniques for difficult subtrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Zinon T Kokkalis; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Dimitris I Ntourantonis; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Thekla Antoniadou; Renos Karamanis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Dimitrios Giannoulis; Eleftheria Souliotis; Theodosis Saranteas; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Elias Panagiotopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-31

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  William E Daner; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Ryan B Graves; Mark C Willis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Influence of fragment volume on stability of 3-part intertrochanteric fracture of the femur: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Do; Yong-Sik Kim; Sung-Jae Lee; Myoung-Lae Jo; Suk-Ku Han
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-04

5.  Early Complications in Proximal Femoral Nailing Done for Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fractures

Authors:  B Kanthimathi; Vl Narayanan
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

7.  Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for fixation of AO 31 A1/2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a 12-year comparison of failure, complications, and mortality.

Authors:  Casey S Whale; D Andrew Hulet; Michael J Beebe; David L Rothberg; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Ami R Stuart; Erik N Kubiak
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

8.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

10.  Proximal femoral nail - an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year.

Authors:  W M Gadegone; Y S Salphale
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.