Literature DB >> 21875421

Radiographic estimation in seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka1, Sylejman Rexhepi, Suzana Manxhuka-Kërliu, Mjellma Rexhepi.   

Abstract

Long since it have been suggested that a subpopulation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosed with negative rheumatoid factor tests, represents a clinical entity quite distinct from that of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to establish a scientific comparative analysis between seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, regarding some radiological and clinical parameters, applied for the first time on patients from Kosovo. Two hundred fifty patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria were retrospectively studied by analysis the radiographic damage and clinical parameters of the disease, using a data base. All examinees were between 25-60 years of age (Xb=49.96, SD=10.37) with disease duration between 1-27 years (Xb = 6.41, SD=6.47). All patients underwent a standardised evaluation radiographs. Baseline standardised poster anterior radiographs of hands and feet and radiographs of other joints, depending on indications, were assessed. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate values correlated with the radiological damages and statistical difference was found for seronegative subset (r=0.24, p<0.01). Longer duration of the disease resulted in the increase of radiological changes in both subsets (r=0.66, p<0.01) seronegative, (r=0.49, p<0.01) seropositive. Anatomic changes of IInd and IIIrd level were nearly equally distributed in both subsets, 76 (60.8%) seronegative, 75 (60%) seropositive. Radiological damages are nearly equal in both subsets, elevate in relation to the duration of the disease and correlate with ESR values. Regarding the sero-status, differences within sex, with some exceptions, are not relevant. Although there are some definite quantitative and qualitative differences regarding sero-status, obviously there is a great deal of overlap between the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21875421      PMCID: PMC4362553          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2011.2571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  32 in total

1.  The effect of HLA-DRB1 genes, rheumatoid factor, and treatment on radiographic disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis over 6 years.

Authors:  R Rau; G Herborn; S Zueger; H Fenner
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Arthritis of the large joints - in particular, the knee - at first presentation is predictive for a high level of radiological destruction of the small joints in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S P Linn-Rasker; A H M van der Helm-van Mil; F C Breedveld; T W J Huizinga
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Disability and health-related quality of life among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with radiographic joint damage, disease activity, pain, and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  I Rupp; H C Boshuizen; H J Dinant; C E Jacobi; G A M van den Bos
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  [An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of early rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  L Senolt
Journal:  Cas Lek Cesk       Date:  2006

Review 5.  How to predict prognosis in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Morel; B Combe
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Erosive rheumatoid factor negative and positive rheumatoid arthritis are immunogenetically similar.

Authors:  R K Vehe; G T Nepom; K R Wilske; D Stage; A B Begovich; B S Nepom
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  The acute-phase response in relation to radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study during the first three years of the disease.

Authors:  M A van Leeuwen; M H van Rijswijk; D M van der Heijde; G J Te Meerman; P L van Riel; P M Houtman; L B van De Putte; P C Limburg
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-06

8.  High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Gero Wieners; Jacqueline Detert; Florian Streitparth; Maciej Pech; Frank Fischbach; Gerd Burmester; Jens Ricke; Marina Backhaus; Harald Bruhn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  Antibodies to cyclic citrullinated protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate predict hand bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of short duration: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Pernille Bøyesen; Mari Hoff; Sigrid Odegård; Glenn Haugeberg; Silje W Syversen; Per I Gaarder; Cecilie Okkenhaug; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Hand bone loss as an outcome measure in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year observational study comparing cortical and total bone loss.

Authors:  Mari Hoff; Glenn Haugeberg; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantifying Potential Cost-Savings Through an Alternative Imaging-Based Diagnostic Process in Presumptive Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Pedro Santos-Moreno; Nelson J Alvis-Zakzuk; Edwin Castillo; Laura Villarreal; Carlos Pineda; Hugo Sandoval; Omaira Valencia
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.