Literature DB >> 17218848

Prophylactic oophorectomy in women at increased cancer risk.

Susan M Domchek1, Timothy R Rebbeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is widely used for cancer risk reduction in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces breast cancer risk by approximately 50% and ovarian cancer risk by 80-95% but may be accompanied by menopausal symptoms, impaired quality of life and accelerated bone loss. Therefore, decisions regarding the timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and the use of post-bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy hormone replacement therapy must be carefully considered. RECENT
FINDINGS: Over the last year, studies have further examined issues related to quality of life associated with bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and have demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy following bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in unaffected women does not negate the breast cancer risk reduction that bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy provides. Studies have provided additional information on the residual risk of cancer following bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy, have demonstrated its benefit in Lynch syndrome and have suggested a short-term mortality benefit following bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
SUMMARY: We review the recent studies regarding bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and their implications for the clinical management of women who are at increased cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218848     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32801195da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  21 in total

1.  Uptake of a randomized breast cancer prevention trial comparing letrozole to placebo in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers: the LIBER trial.

Authors:  Pascal Pujol; Christine Lasset; Pascaline Berthet; Catherine Dugast; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Isabelle Tennevet; Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet; Pascale This; Karen Baudry; Jerome Lemonnier; Lise Roca; Sylvie Mijonnet; Paul Gesta; Jean Chiesa; Helene Dreyfus; Philippe Vennin; Capucine Delnatte; Yves Jean Bignon; Alain Lortholary; Fabienne Prieur; Laurence Gladieff; Anne Lesur; Krishna B Clough; Catherine Nogues; Anne-Laure Martin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Peritoneal washing cytology in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies: a 10-year experience and reappraisal of its clinical utility.

Authors:  G Landon; J Stewart; M Deavers; K Lu; N Sneige
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Long term follow up of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with unsuspected neoplasia identified at risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  C B Powell; E M Swisher; I Cass; J McLennan; B Norquist; R L Garcia; J Lester; B Y Karlan; L Chen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The consequences of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: the case for a coordinated approach to long-term follow up post surgical menopause.

Authors:  Carmel Pezaro; Paul James; Joanne McKinley; Mary Shanahan; Mary-Anne Young; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  A high response rate to liposomal doxorubicin is seen among women with BRCA mutations treated for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Adams; Evelyn B Marsh; Wafic Elmasri; Steffanie Halberstadt; Stephanie Vandecker; Mary D Sammel; Angela R Bradbury; Mary Daly; Beth Karlan; Stephen C Rubin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The impact of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery in premenopausal women at high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer due to Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Ramona Moldovan; Sianan Keating; Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Genomic Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Michael F Walsh; Katherine L Nathanson; Fergus J Couch; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging and classification of ovarian cancer: ex vivo and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Hassan S Salehi; Hai Li; Alex Merkulov; Patrick D Kumavor; Hamed Vavadi; Melinda Sanders; Angela Kueck; Molly A Brewer; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Confocal microlaparoscope for imaging the fallopian tube.

Authors:  Tzu-Yu Wu; Andrew R Rouse; Setsuko K Chambers; Kenneth D Hatch; Arthur F Gmitro
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 10.  New strategies in ovarian cancer: uptake and experience of women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Mary B Daly; John Scarpato
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.