Literature DB >> 22076253

Uptake of a randomized breast cancer prevention trial comparing letrozole to placebo in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers: the LIBER trial.

Pascal Pujol1, Christine Lasset, Pascaline Berthet, Catherine Dugast, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Pierre Fricker, Isabelle Tennevet, Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet, Pascale This, Karen Baudry, Jerome Lemonnier, Lise Roca, Sylvie Mijonnet, Paul Gesta, Jean Chiesa, Helene Dreyfus, Philippe Vennin, Capucine Delnatte, Yves Jean Bignon, Alain Lortholary, Fabienne Prieur, Laurence Gladieff, Anne Lesur, Krishna B Clough, Catherine Nogues, Anne-Laure Martin.   

Abstract

Women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations are considered as an extreme risk population for developing breast cancer. Prophylactic mastectomy provides a valid option to reduce such risk, impacting however, the quality of life. Medical prevention by aromatase inhibitor that has also recently shown to have preventive effect may thus be considered as an alternative. LIBER is an ongoing double-blind, randomized phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of 5-year letrozole versus placebo to decrease breast cancer incidence in post-menopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (NCT00673335). We present data on the uptake of this trial. We compared characteristics of women in the LIBER trial (n = 113) to those of women enrolled in the prospective ongoing national GENEPSO cohort (n = 1,505). Uptake was evaluated through a survey sent to all active centres, with responses obtained from 17 to the 20 (85%) centres. According to the characteristics of the women enrolled in the GENEPSO cohort and the survey, approximately one-third of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were eligible for the trial. Five hundred and thirty-four women eligible from chart review have been informed by mail about the prevention trial and were invited to an oral information by participating centres. Forty-four percentage of them came to the dedicated medical visit. Uptake of drug prevention trial was 32% among women informed orally and 15% of all the eligible women. The main reasons of refusal were: potential side effects, probability to receive the placebo and lack of support from their physicians. Additionally, we noticed that prior prophylactic oophorectomy and previous unilateral breast cancer were more frequent in women enrolled in the LIBER trial than in the French cohort (93% vs. 60% and 50% vs. 39%, respectively). Based on an overall 15% uptake among all eligible subjects, greater and wider information of the trial should be offered to women with BRCA1/2 mutation to improve recruitment. Women with previous unilateral breast cancer or prior prophylactic oophorectomy are more likely to enter a medical prevention trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22076253     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9484-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  40 in total

1.  Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; José E Alés-Martínez; Angela M Cheung; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Anne McTiernan; John Robbins; Karen C Johnson; Lisa W Martin; Eric Winquist; Gloria E Sarto; Judy E Garber; Carol J Fabian; Pascal Pujol; Elizabeth Maunsell; Patricia Farmer; Karen A Gelmon; Dongsheng Tu; Harriet Richardson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Is BRCA1/BRCA2-related breast carcinogenesis estrogen dependent?

Authors:  Mehadad Noruzinia; Isabelle Coupier; Pascal Pujol
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Oophorectomy for breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2009-01

4.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Reena S Cecchini; Walter M Cronin; Andre Robidoux; Therese B Bevers; Maureen T Kavanah; James N Atkins; Richard G Margolese; Carolyn D Runowicz; Joan M James; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Twenty-year follow-up of the Royal Marsden randomized, double-blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Trevor J Powles; Sue Ashley; Alwynne Tidy; Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: late results of the Italian Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trial among women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Nicole Rotmensz; Bernardo Bonanni; Peter Boyle; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Costa; Virgilio Sacchini; Roberto Travaglini; Giuseppe D'Aiuto; Pasquale Oliviero; Francesco Lovison; Giacomo Gucciardo; Marco Rosselli del Turco; Maria Grazia Muraca; Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta; Serafino Conforti; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Managing the toxicities of the aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yvonne Brandberg; Kerstin Sandelin; Staffan Erikson; Göran Jurell; Annelie Liljegren; Annika Lindblom; Ann Lindén; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Marie Wickman; Brita Arver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Breast tissue density change after oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carrier patients using visual and volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Ariane Dunant; Suzette Delaloge; Delphine Wehrer; Tania Moussa; Olivier Caron; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and BRCA1.

Authors:  Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Responsiveness of Brca1 and Trp53 Deficiency-Induced Mammary Preneoplasia to Selective Estrogen Modulators versus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Mus musculus.

Authors:  Sahar J Alothman; Weisheng Wang; David S Goerlitz; Md Islam; Xiaogang Zhong; Archana Kishore; Redha I Azhar; Bhaskar V Kallakury; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 4.  Trends in use of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy vs high-risk surveillance in unaffected carriers of inherited breast cancer syndromes in the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE).

Authors:  Danielle A Henry; Marie C Lee; Deanna Almanza; Kamran A Ahmed; Weihong Sun; David C Boulware; Christine Laronga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Breast and ovarian cancer risk management in a French cohort of 158 women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation: patient choices and outcome.

Authors:  Pascale This; Anne de la Rochefordière; Alexia Savignoni; Marie Christine Falcou; Anne Tardivon; Fabienne Thibault; Séverine Alran; Virgine Fourchotte; Alfred Fitoussi; Benoit Couturaud; Sylvie Dolbeault; Remy J Salmon; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Bernard Asselain; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Comparison of tamoxifen and letrozole response in mammary preneoplasia of ER and aromatase overexpressing mice defines an immune-associated gene signature linked to tamoxifen resistance.

Authors:  Sarah A Dabydeen; Keunsoo Kang; Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; Ahmad Alamri; Margaret L Axelrod; Kerrie B Bouker; Rawan Al-Kharboosh; Robert Clarke; Lothar Hennighausen; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 7.  Challenging and complex decisions in the management of the BRCA mutation carrier.

Authors:  Daniela L Stan; Lynne T Shuster; Myra J Wick; Casey L Swanson; Sandhya Pruthi; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Nonsurgical Prevention Strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Christian F Singer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Cancer prevention as biomodulation: targeting the initiating stimulus and secondary adaptations.

Authors:  Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S G Smith; I Sestak; A Forster; A Partridge; L Side; M S Wolf; R Horne; J Wardle; J Cuzick
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.