INTRODUCTION: Pig islets have been proposed as an alternative to human islets for clinical use, but their use is limited by rejection. The availability of genetically modified pigs devoid of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase might provide islets more suitable for xenotransplantation. To limit the costs involved in the logistics and health care of pigs for clinical xenotransplantation, we have studied whether younger, rather than older, pigs that are typically preferred can be used as islet donors. METHODS: We utilized pancreases from Yorkshire and White Landrace wild-type pigs and alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs of three main different age and size groups: (i) <6 months, (ii) 6 to 12 months, and (iii) >2 yr of age, inclusive of retired breeders. We compared isolation yield and in vitro and in vivo function of islet cells obtained from these groups. RESULTS: Islets from adult pigs (>2 yr) offered not only higher islet yields, but retained the ability to preserve intact morphology during the isolation process and culture, in association with high functional properties after transplantation. Following isolation, islet cells from young (<6 m) and young-adult (6 to 12 m) pigs dissociated into small aggregates and single cells, and exhibited inferior functional properties than adult islets both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the conclusion that, in view of the large number of islets needed to maintain normoglycemia after xenotransplantation, organ-source pigs need to reach adult age (>2 yr) before being considered optimal islet donors, in spite of the higher costs involved.
INTRODUCTION:Pig islets have been proposed as an alternative to human islets for clinical use, but their use is limited by rejection. The availability of genetically modified pigs devoid of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase might provide islets more suitable for xenotransplantation. To limit the costs involved in the logistics and health care of pigs for clinical xenotransplantation, we have studied whether younger, rather than older, pigs that are typically preferred can be used as islet donors. METHODS: We utilized pancreases from Yorkshire and White Landrace wild-type pigs and alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs of three main different age and size groups: (i) <6 months, (ii) 6 to 12 months, and (iii) >2 yr of age, inclusive of retired breeders. We compared isolation yield and in vitro and in vivo function of islet cells obtained from these groups. RESULTS: Islets from adult pigs (>2 yr) offered not only higher islet yields, but retained the ability to preserve intact morphology during the isolation process and culture, in association with high functional properties after transplantation. Following isolation, islet cells from young (<6 m) and young-adult (6 to 12 m) pigs dissociated into small aggregates and single cells, and exhibited inferior functional properties than adult islets both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the conclusion that, in view of the large number of islets needed to maintain normoglycemia after xenotransplantation, organ-source pigs need to reach adult age (>2 yr) before being considered optimal islet donors, in spite of the higher costs involved.
Authors: Takayuki Tanaka; Minoru Fujita; Rita Bottino; Jon D Piganelli; Kevin McGrath; Jiang Li; Whayoung Lee; Hayato Iwase; Martin Wijkstrom; Suzanne Bertera; Cassandra Long; Douglas Landsittel; Ken Haruma; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Islets Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Stephen T Bartlett; James F Markmann; Paul Johnson; Olle Korsgren; Bernhard J Hering; David Scharp; Thomas W H Kay; Jonathan Bromberg; Jon S Odorico; Gordon C Weir; Nancy Bridges; Raja Kandaswamy; Peter Stock; Peter Friend; Mitsukazu Gotoh; David K C Cooper; Chung-Gyu Park; Phillip OʼConnell; Cherie Stabler; Shinichi Matsumoto; Barbara Ludwig; Pratik Choudhary; Boris Kovatchev; Michael R Rickels; Megan Sykes; Kathryn Wood; Kristy Kraemer; Albert Hwa; Edward Stanley; Camillo Ricordi; Mark Zimmerman; Julia Greenstein; Eduard Montanya; Timo Otonkoski Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jill K Badin; Victor Progar; Anisha Pareddy; Jordan Cagle; Mouhamad Alloosh; Michael Sturek Journal: Comp Med Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: David K C Cooper; Shinichi Matsumoto; Adrian Abalovich; Takeshi Itoh; Nizar I Mourad; Pierre R Gianello; Eckhard Wolf; Emanuele Cozzi Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Whayoung Lee; Hidetaka Hara; Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Hayato Iwase; Rita Bottino; Cassandra Long; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; David Ayares; David K C Cooper Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Minoru Fujita; Kevin M McGrath; Rita Bottino; Eefje M Dons; Cassandra Long; Goutham Kumar; Burcin Ekser; Gabriel J Echeverri; Jiro Hata; Ken Haruma; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 4.064