Literature DB >> 17212649

C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice vary in lick rate and ingestive microstructure.

J D Boughter1, J-P Baird, J Bryant, S J St John, D Heck.   

Abstract

Fluid licking in mice is an example of a rhythmic behavior thought to be under the control of a central pattern generator. Inbred strains of mice have been shown to differ in mean or modal interlick interval (ILI) duration, suggesting a genetic-based variation. We investigated water licking in the commonly used inbred strains C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2), using a commercially available contact lickometer. Results from 20-min test sessions indicated that D2 mice lick at a faster rate than B6 mice (10.6 licks/s vs. 8.5 licks/s), based on analysis of the distribution of short-duration ILIs (50-160 ms). This strain difference was independent of sex, extent of water deprivation or total number of licks. D2 mice also displayed a faster lick rate when the strains were tested with a series of brief (5 s) trials. However, when ingestion over the entire 20-min session was analyzed, it was evident that D2 mice had an overall slower rate of ingestion than B6 mice. This was because of the tendency for D2 mice to have more very long pauses (>30 s) between sequences of licking bursts. Overall, it appeared that D2 mice licked more efficiently, ingesting more rapidly during excursions to the spout that were fewer and farther between.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17212649     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  33 in total

1.  Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Lentiviral-mediated knock-down of GD3 synthase protects against MPTP-induced motor deficits and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Anandh Dhanushkodi; Yi Xue; Emily E Roguski; Yun Ding; Shannon G Matta; Detlef Heck; Guo-Huang Fan; Michael P McDonald
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A simple 2-transistor touch or lick detector circuit.

Authors:  Burton Slotnick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

5.  Effects of thioTEPA chemotherapy on cognition and motor coordination.

Authors:  Tyler C Alexander; Frederico Kiffer; Thomas Groves; Julie Anderson; Jing Wang; Abdallah Hayar; Michelle T Chen; Analiz Rodriguez; Antiño R Allen
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Cerebellar cortical output encodes temporal aspects of rhythmic licking movements and is necessary for normal licking frequency.

Authors:  Jerí L Bryant; John D Boughter; Suzhen Gong; Mark S LeDoux; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Overlapping Representation of Primary Tastes in a Defined Region of the Gustatory Cortex.

Authors:  Max L Fletcher; M Cameron Ogg; Lianyi Lu; Robert J Ogg; John D Boughter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A technique for stereotaxic recordings of neuronal activity in awake, head-restrained mice.

Authors:  Jeri L Bryant; Snigdha Roy; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Propensity for social interaction predicts nicotine-reinforced behaviors in outbred rats.

Authors:  T Wang; W Han; B Wang; Q Jiang; L C Solberg-Woods; A A Palmer; H Chen
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.