Literature DB >> 17211577

An approach to the validation of novel molecular markers of breast cancer via TMA-based FISH scanning.

Raymond R Tubbs1, Eric Swain, James D Pettay, David G Hicks.   

Abstract

Tissue microarrays (TMA) are valuable tools for validating results of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (ACGH) and other translational research applications requiring independent verification of genomic gains and losses by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, spatial orientation and accurate manual tracking of the TMA cores is challenging and prone to error. Image analysis combined with core tracking software, implemented via an automated FISH scanning workstation, represents a new approach to FISH and TMA-based validation of novel genomic changes discovered by ACGH in breast and other cancers. Automated large-scale tissue microarray validation FISH studies of genomic gains and losses identified by ACGH for breast cancer are feasible using an automated imaging scanner and tracking/classifying software. Furthermore, by leveraging the bifunctional fluorescent and chromogenic properties of the alkaline phosphatase chromogen fast red K and combining the technology with FISH, correlative and simultaneous phenotype/genotype studies may be enabled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17211577     DOI: 10.1007/s10735-006-9076-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Histol        ISSN: 1567-2379            Impact factor:   3.156


  48 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  J R Pollack; C M Perou; A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S S Jeffrey; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Chromosomal breakpoint mapping by arrayCGH using flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  Imke M Veltman; Joris A Veltman; Ger Arkesteijn; Irene M Janssen; Lisenka E Vissers; Pieter J de Jong; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F Schoenmakers
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number using oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Graham R Bignell; Jing Huang; Joel Greshock; Stephen Watt; Adam Butler; Sofie West; Mira Grigorova; Keith W Jones; Wen Wei; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Barbara Weber; Michael H Shapero; Richard Wooster
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  OCGR array: an oral cancer genomic regional array for comparative genomic hybridization analysis.

Authors:  Cathie Garnis; Jennifer Campbell; Lewei Zhang; Miriam P Rosin; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.

Authors:  S Solinas-Toldo; S Lampel; S Stilgenbauer; J Nickolenko; A Benner; H Döhner; T Cremer; P Lichter
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Combined comparative genomic hybridization and genomic microarray for detection of gene amplifications in pulmonary artery intimal sarcomas and adrenocortical tumors.

Authors:  Jianming Zhao; Jürgen Roth; Beata Bode-Lesniewska; Madeleine Pfaltz; Philipp U Heitz; Paul Komminoth
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Pamela L Paris; Donna G Albertson; Janneke C Alers; Armann Andaya; Peter Carroll; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay N Jain; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Daniel Pinkel; Fritz H Schröder; Kees J Vissers; Vivienne J E Watson; Mark F Wildhagen; Colin Collins; Herman Van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  The pattern of gene copy number changes in bilateral breast cancer surveyed by cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Min Young Seo; Sun Young Rha; Sang Hwa Yang; Sang Cheol Kim; Gui Youn Lee; Chan Hee Park; Woo Ick Yang; Joong Bae Ahn; Byung Woo Park; Hyun Cheol Chung
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.101

9.  Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.

Authors:  S du Manoir; M R Speicher; S Joos; E Schröck; S Popp; H Döhner; G Kovacs; M Robert-Nicoud; P Lichter; T Cremer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Comprehensive genome-wide comparison of DNA and RNA level scan using microarray technology for identification of candidate cancer-related genes in the HL-60 cell line.

Authors:  Celal Ulger; Gokce A Toruner; Mualla Alkan; Mansoor Mohammed; Shamsha Damani; Jason Kang; Anthony Galante; Hana Aviv; Patricia Soteropoulos; Peter P Tolias; Marvin N Schwalb; James J Dermody
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2003-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Successful application of a direct detection slide-based sequential phenotype/genotype assay using archived bone marrow smears and paraffin embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  Victoria Bedell; Stephen J Forman; Karl Gaal; Vinod Pullarkat; Lawrence M Weiss; Marilyn L Slovak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Virtual microscopy as an enabler of automated/quantitative assessment of protein expression in TMAs.

Authors:  Catherine Conway; Lynne Dobson; Anthony O'Grady; Elaine Kay; Sean Costello; Daniel O'Shea
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Quantification of diverse subcellular immunohistochemical markers with clinicobiological relevancies: validation of a new computer-assisted image analysis procedure.

Authors:  Marylène Lejeune; Joaquín Jaén; Lluis Pons; Carlos López; Maria-Teresa Salvadó; Ramón Bosch; Marcial García; Patricia Escrivà; Jordi Baucells; Xavier Cugat; Tomás Alvaro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy as a function of HER2 and TOP2A status.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; William E Barlow; G Thomas Budd; Eric Swain; Peggy Porter; Allen Gown; I-Ten Yeh; George Sledge; Charles Shapiro; James Ingle; Charles Haskell; Kathy S Albain; Robert Livingston; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Genotyping of phenotypically defined cells in neoplasia: enhanced immunoFISH via tyramide signal amplification (TSA) segregates immunophenotypically-defined cell populations for gated genotyping.

Authors:  Raymond R Tubbs; Kingshuk Das; James R Cook; James D Pettay; Patrick C Roche; Thomas Grogan
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  The specificity of interphase FISH translocation probes in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections is readily assessed using automated staining and scoring of tissue microarrays constructed from murine xenografts.

Authors:  Raymond R Tubbs; James Pettay; Todd S Barry; Eric Swain; Margaret Loftus; James R Cook; Marek Skacel; Gillian Paine; Patrick Roche; Thomas Grogan
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 3.156

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.