Literature DB >> 17209919

Evaluation of six presumptive tests for blood, their specificity, sensitivity, and effect on high molecular-weight DNA.

Shanan S Tobe1, Nigel Watson, Niamh Nic Daéid.   

Abstract

Luminol, leuchomalachite green, phenolphthalein, Hemastix, Hemident, and Bluestar are all used as presumptive tests for blood. In this study, the tests were subjected to dilute blood (from 1:10,000 to 1:10,000,000), many common household substance, and chemicals. Samples were tested for DNA to determine whether the presumptive tests damaged or destroyed DNA. The DNA loci tested were D2S1338 and D19S433. Leuchomalachite green had a sensitivity of 1:10,000, while the remaining tests were able to detect blood to a dilution of 1:100,000. Substances tested include saliva, semen, potato, tomato, tomato sauce, tomato sauce with meat, red onion, red kidney bean, horseradish, 0.1 M ascorbic acid, 5% bleach, 10% cupric sulfate, 10% ferric sulfate, and 10% nickel chloride. Of all the substances tested, not one of the household items reacted with every test; however, the chemicals did. DNA was recovered and amplified from luminol, phenolphthalein, Hemastix, and Bluestar, but not from leuchomalachite green or Hemident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17209919     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  10 in total

1.  Detectability, visualization, and DNA analysis of bloodstains after repainting the walls.

Authors:  Frank Ramsthaler; Julia Schlote; Axel Gehl; Sabine Cappel-Hoffmann; Mattias Kettner
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  mRNA profiling using a minimum of five mRNA markers per body fluid and a novel scoring method for body fluid identification.

Authors:  Amy D Roeder; Cordula Haas
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen.

Authors:  Marielle Vennemann; Georgina Scott; Lynn Curran; Felix Bittner; Shanan S Tobe
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Blood identification and discrimination between human and nonhuman blood using portable Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  J Fujihara; Y Fujita; T Yamamoto; N Nishimoto; K Kimura-Kataoka; S Kurata; Y Takinami; T Yasuda; H Takeshita
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Comprehensive examination of conventional and innovative body fluid identification approaches and DNA profiling of laundered blood- and saliva-stained pieces of cloths.

Authors:  G Kulstein; P Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Improving body fluid identification in forensic trace evidence-construction of an immunochromatographic test array to rapidly detect up to five body fluids simultaneously.

Authors:  Hannah Holtkötter; Kristina Schwender; Peter Wiegand; Heidi Peiffer; Marielle Vennemann
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Blood identification at the single-cell level based on a combination of laser tweezers Raman spectroscopy and machine learning.

Authors:  Ziqi Wang; Yiming Liu; Weilai Lu; Yu Vincent Fu; Zhehai Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling.

Authors:  Gnyaneshwari Patel; Andy Hopwood
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Design and optimization of a 16S microbial qPCR multiplex for the presumptive identification of feces, saliva, vaginal and menstrual secretions.

Authors:  Carolyn Lewis; Sarah J Seashols-Williams
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.717

10.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a tool to identify biological matrices in forensic science.

Authors:  Katleen Van Steendam; Marlies De Ceuleneer; Maarten Dhaenens; David Van Hoofstat; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.686

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.