Literature DB >> 17208299

Biomphalaria glabrata transcriptome: identification of cell-signalling, transcriptional control and immune-related genes from open reading frame expressed sequence tags (ORESTES).

Anne E Lockyer1, Jennifer N Spinks, Anthony J Walker, Richard A Kane, Leslie R Noble, David Rollinson, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, Catherine S Jones.   

Abstract

Biomphalaria glabrata is the major intermediate snail host for Schistosoma mansoni, one of the important schistosomes infecting man. Much remains to be discovered concerning specific molecules mediating the defence events in these intermediate hosts, triggered by invading schistosomes. An expressed sequence tag (EST) gene discovery strategy known as ORESTES has been employed to identify transcripts that might be involved in snail-schistosome interactions in order to examine gene expression patterns in infected B. glabrata. Over 3930 ESTs were sequenced from cDNA libraries made from both schistosome-exposed and unexposed snails using different tissue types, producing a database of 1843 non-redundant clones. The non-redundant set has been assessed for gene ontology and KEGG pathway assignments. This approach has revealed a number of signalling, antioxidant and immune-related gene homologues that, based on current understanding of molluscan and other comparative systems, might play an important role in the molluscan defence response towards infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17208299      PMCID: PMC1871615          DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2006.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol        ISSN: 0145-305X            Impact factor:   3.636


Introduction

The freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata is an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni, the digenean parasite that causes human intestinal schistosomiasis. This host–parasite relationship has become a model system for examination of snail–schistosome interactions, and as such, recent molecular work has focused on B. glabrata. Now with the continued significance of genome research, the B. glabrata genome initiative (http://biology.unm.edu/biomphalaria-genome/) aims to increase the available genetic data for this snail species, with the final goal of a complete genome sequence. Such sequence data will complement that available for the schistosome parasite from the schistosome genome/transcriptome sequencing initiatives [1-5] and for the definitive host from the human genome project [6]. In addition to genome sequencing, the generation of expressed sequence tags (ESTs), short stretches of sequence obtained from cDNA libraries [7], is valuable in a number of ways: in identifying snail homologues of genes previously described in other species; for identifying transcribed regions of the genome, useful for genome annotation and analysis; for the detection of splice variants and alternative polyadenylation gene isoforms; in the discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and finally for expression studies, such as those involving microarrays. The EST project described here was initiated with the ultimate aim of manufacturing a cDNA microarray for B. glabrata, which required a large number of sequenced cDNA clones to be available. EST projects in other molluscs, such as oysters, have revealed a wealth of useful sequence data including signalling, antioxidant and immune-related gene homologues [8,9], demonstrating that molluscs express many of the same genes, and may therefore carry out the same processes, which have previously been described in vertebrates. A recent EST project from Lymnaea stagnalis [10] identified a number of genes that had not previously been identified in the Lophotrochozoa. Therefore initiating an EST sequencing project in B. glabrata has the potential to identify other novel molluscan genes including those that might be associated with the snail's response to infection. At the start of this project (January 2003) only 1427 B. glabrata EST sequences were available on GenBank from earlier studies [11-15]. During the course of this project several other laboratories have also developed gene discovery programmes for B. glabrata [16,17] (see also http://biology.unm.edu/biomphalaria-genome/detailing unpublished EST programmes). Previous EST projects in B. glabrata [11,15] used traditional library construction and sequencing approaches to obtain sequence data. A complimentary EST approach called open reading frame ESTs (ORESTES) [18] has been used successfully to obtain large numbers of sequences for both human [18-20] and schistosome [4,5] transcriptome projects. The ORESTES approach preferentially targets the middle section of mRNAs [18], making it more likely coding regions will be sequenced, than in other EST methodologies where sequencing commences at the end of the cDNA, often only obtaining untranslated sequence. This alternative method has two advantages for snail ESTs; firstly, it is more likely that gene similarity to other organisms can be ascertained if coding regions are sequenced, and secondly, the data generated are likely to be complementary to, rather than redundant with, sequence data from traditional approaches. The ORESTES approach also allows the construction of a number of mini-libraries using small quantities of RNA [21], making it suitable for investigating gene expression in small amounts of tissue such as those present in B. glabrata. Producing a large number of smaller libraries also facilitates a more extensive analysis of gene expression; thus in the EST project described here, different snail strains (both resistant and susceptible to S. mansoni infection) were used and different tissue types from both parasite-exposed and unexposed material were examined. Based on gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway assignments a number of antioxidant, signalling and immune-related gene homologues have been identified and are presented here; the potential involvement of these genes in molluscan defence is considered, particularly within the framework of comparative immunobiology.

Materials and methods

Snail material

B. glabrata strains used were: resistant BS90 [22] (NHM3017) or susceptible NHM1742 or BB02 (NHM3032), the strain currently being used for the genome sequencing project (see http://biology.unm.edu/biomphalaria-genome/BB02STRAIN.html). Snails were held overnight in autoclaved snail water with 100 μg/ml ampicillin prior to killing by decapitation. The exuded haemolymph was collected, pooled and the haemocytes isolated by centrifugation at 4 °C, 10,000g for 20 min. Each snail was preserved in 800 μl RNAlater (Ambion Inc., Texas, USA) and stored at −20 °C until dissection. Haemopoietic organ, ovotestis, head/foot and brain tissue was dissected. For the exposed material, 60 snails were individually exposed to 10 S. mansoni miracidia (Belo Horizonte strain) each and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h after infection, 12 of the snails were swiftly killed as above. Tissue was pooled from each time period; the extended sampling was designed to include all transcripts expressed over the first 24 h of infection.

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from each dissected tissue using SV RNA extraction kit (Promega UK Ltd, Southampton, UK) according to the manufacturer's protocol. This kit includes DNAse treatment to eliminate genomic DNA contamination. Pigment from the head/foot tissue was found to block the spin columns supplied with this extraction kit, so RNA was extracted from this tissue using Trizol (Invitrogen Ltd, Paisley, UK). Briefly, 30 mg tissue was ground in 1 ml Trizol and centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was incubated at room temperature for 5 min then 0.2 ml chloroform added, mixed vigorously and left at room temperature for 3 min. The samples were spun at 12,000g, 4 °C for 15 min and the RNA precipitated from the supernatant using 0.5 ml propan-2-ol and centrifugation at 12,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed using 75% ethanol and dissolved in 50–100 μl water. RNA extracted using Trizol was DNAse treated (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions prior to mRNA extraction. mRNA was extracted from the total RNA from both extraction methods using the Micro-fastTrack 2.0 mRNA extraction kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The mRNA was eluted in 200 μl elution buffer and precipitated overnight at −70 °C using 600 μl ethanol. The mRNA was dissolved in 10 μl water and tested using specific B. glabrata actin primers [12] to check there was no DNA contamination.

cDNA synthesis and amplification

For each library, a 27 μl mastermix containing 800 U Reverse Transcriptase (MMLV-RT) (Promega), 4 μl RNAsin (Promega), 4 μl dNTPs at 2 mM, 8 μl 5× buffer (Promega) and 7 μl mRNA (70–240 ng) was prepared and 2 μl aliquoted into 12 tubes prepared with 12 different arbitrary primers (1.5 μl of 15 mM) (for primer sequences see supplementary material). The tubes were incubated at 42 °C for 1 h then heated to 70 °C for 10 min. Amplification was carried out using Ready-to-go beads (Amersham Biosience, Amersham, UK). The 3.5 μl cDNA reactions (including primers) and 25 μl water were each added to a tube containing a single bead and amplified using the following cycling conditions: 75 °C for 5 min followed by 15 cycles at 94 °C, 52–45 °C for 1 min (touchdown PCR, dropping 0.5 °C each cycle) and 1 min 72 °C, then 26 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min, then 7 min at 72 °C. A negative control (no DNA) was carried out simultaneously for each primer (dissolving 2 ready-to-go beads in 50 μl water and aliquoting 3 μl into a tube containing 0.3 μl primer (at 15 mM)). Three μl of each synthesis reaction was examined by gel electrophoresis alongside the control amplification and reactions chosen for inclusion in the mini-library only if the control amplification showed no contamination and a smear without single prominent bands in the reaction profile. This ensured that a mix of products would be obtained from each library.

Cloning and sequencing

For each library, the selected amplified cDNA samples were pooled and cloned using pGEM-T easy cloning kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One hundred and ninety two clones (2×96), selected at random from the cloning plates were picked into 0.5 ml LB and grown up overnight. Ten μl PCRs with M13 forward and reverse primers were carried out to check insert size and the presence of a single insert and, from these, 96 colonies were chosen for 100 μl PCRs. PCRs contained 1×NH4 reaction buffer (Bioline, London, UK), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.2 μM each M13 Forward and Reverse primers and 0.025 U/μl PCR Taq polymerase (Bioline, London, UK). Cycling conditions were: 94 °C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, then 10 min at 72 °C. Glycerol stocks for the selected colonies were stored at −80 °C. PCR products were purified using Multiscreen PCR filter plates (Millipore, Billerica, USA) then cycle-sequenced directly using BigDye kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and T7 primer and run on ABI 377 or capillary sequencers. Vector, primer and poor quality sequences were removed using Sequencher 3.1.1 (GeneCodes Corp., Ann Arbor, USA).

Bioinformatics

Cluster analysis was performed in SeqTools (http://www.seqtools.dk/) using BlastN score values (cut-off value 0.5) and used to calculate percentage redundancy. For each library BlastN and BlastX [23] searches were run and any ribosomal sequences and sequences shorter then 80 bp removed. Duplicate sequences were also removed, although overlapping sequences were retained. Since each library represented different tissues, strains or infected/uninfected material, duplicate sequences between libraries were retained.

Clone nomenclature

Each clone had a unique ZB number assigned during sequencing. In addition to this the clones were also assigned a code based on strain (see Section 2.1), tissue type (B—brain, HO—haemopoietic organ, HAEM—haemocytes, HF—head/foot and OT—ovotestis), infection status (EX—parasite exposed, UN—unexposed) and plate number and position. The sequences were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers CK149151-CK149590, CK656591-CK656938, CO870183-CO870449, CV548035-CV548805, EG030731-EG030747).

Gene function

Gene ontology functions were assigned using GOblet (http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/). KEGG pathway analysis was carried out using the KEGG automatic annotation server (KAAS) for ortholog assignment and pathway mapping (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/).

Results

ORESTES libraries

A total of 41 ORESTES libraries were made from five tissue types (head–foot, brain, ovotestis, haemocytes and haemopoietic organ) from the three B. glabrata strains, one resistant (NHM3017) and two susceptible (NHM1742 and BB02 (NHM3032)), using material that had either remained unexposed or had been exposed to S. mansoni (Table 1). Some of the libraries were made from the same snail strain and tissue type but were separately made with different primers, using new experimental material, so have been treated independently. Libraries were prepared from each of the two susceptible strains for each tissue, with the exception of exposed ovotestis from NHM1742 where two libraries were made. Two or three libraries were prepared per tissue and exposure type for the resistant strain, with the exception of brain tissue where material was limiting. A single plate of 96 clones was sequenced for each library and in total, 3936 clones were sequenced from 41 libraries.
Table 1

Biomphalaria glabrata ORESTES libraries. The number of non-redundant (NR) sequences was determined after cluster and Blast analyses to remove duplicate and ribosomal sequences from within each library

StrainaTissuebParasite exposurecNo. sequences obtained% redundancyNo. NR sequences% Unique (and non-ribo)Library name
1742HFEX9336.65559.1BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Head/foot
1742HFUN8852.33539.8BgORESTES uninfected NHM 1742 Head/foot
1742OTUN8946.13640.4BgORESTES uninfected NHM 1742 Ovotestis
3017OTEX94504547.9BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Ovotestis
1742OTEX9047.85156.7BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Ovotestis 1
1742OTEX9158.23740.7BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Ovotestis 2
1742HAEMEX9153.82425.3BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Haemocytes
1742HOUN9251.14245.7BgORESTES uninfected NHM 1742 Haemopoietic organ
1742HOEX9656.33637.5BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Haemopoietic organ
1742HAEMUN9258.72426.1BgORESTES uninfected NHM 1742 Haemocytes
3017HFEX9430.95861.7BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Head/foot
3017OTUN9440.45356.4BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Ovotestis
3017OTEX9340.95255.9BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Ovotestis2
3017HAEMUN9447.73537.2BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Haemocytes
3017HAEMEX8757.52023.0BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Haemocytes
3017HOUN9128.65661.5BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Haemopoietic organ
3017HOEX8130.94758.0BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Haemopoietic organ
3017HFUN9534.75254.7BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Head/foot
3017HFEX9652.13435.4BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Head/foot2
3017HAEMUN93294245.2BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Haemocytes2
3017HAEMEX9070910.0BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Haemocytes2
3017HOUN9362.41617.2BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Haemopoietic organ2
3017HOEX9671.92020.8BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Haemopoietic organ2
3017OTUN9635.45759.4BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Ovotestis2
3017OTEX9445.74750.0BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Ovotestis3
3017HFUN9443.64042.6BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Head/foot2
3017HFEX9350.53941.9BgORESTES schistosome-exposed NHM 3017 Head/foot3
1742BUN95206669.5BgORESTES uninfected NHM 1742 Brain
1742BEX949.68287.2BgORESTES infected NHM 1742 Brain
3017BUN9171.41819.8BgORESTES unexposed NHM 3017 Brain
3017BEX9457.43234.0BgORESTES schistosome-unexposed NHM 3017 Brain
3032HFEX9551.64345.3BgORESTES infected NHM 3032 Head/foot
3032OTEX9446.84750.0BgORESTES infected NHM 3032 Ovotestis
3032BEX9442.64952.1BgORESTES infected NHM 3032 Brain
3032HOEX9636.55658.3BgORESTES infected NHM 3032 Haemopoietic organ
3032HAEMUN9524.26467.4BgORESTES uninfected NHM 3032 Haemocytes
3032HAEMEX9633.34749.0BgORESTES infected NHM 3032 Haemocytes
3032HFUN9336.65963.4BgORESTES uninfected NHM 3032 Head/foot
3032OTUN9419.17478.7BgORESTES uninfected NHM 3032 Ovotestis
3032BUN9523.27376.8BgORESTES uninfected NHM 3032 Brain
3032HOUN9316.17176.3BgORESTES uninfected NHM 3032 Haemopoietic organ


Total38091843
Mean43.244.948.2

NHM Strain: 3017—resistant snails, 1742, 3032 (BB02)—susceptible snails.

Tissue type: HF—head/foot, OT—ovotestis, HO—haemopoietic organ, HAEM—haemocytes, B—brain.

Snails exposed (EX) or unexposed (UN) to S. mansoni miracidia.

Analysis of total ESTs and selection of non-redundant ESTs

A total of 3809 sequences were obtained (127 reactions did not work or the sequenced clones contained no insert or had mixed sequences so these were not analysed further) and were compared to the non-redundant section of GenBank. The Blast results (Table 2) showed that 28.5% of the gene fragments identified proteins on the database, including 35 previously characterized B. glabrata proteins and 127 proteins with no assigned function. Including some other non-coding gene fragment matches, less than 2% () of the sequences matched characterized B. glabrata genes or proteins in the non-redundant section of GenBank. Nearly 35% could not be assigned any function, either having no Blast matches, or having homology to a nucleotide or protein sequence on GenBank with no function described. Unfortunately, 39% of the sequences matched B. glabrata ribosomal sequences. Other workers [16] have also found a large ribosomal content in polyA selected RNA from B. glabrata, and concluded that the high A content in B. glabrata ribosomal sequences meant that polyA selection did not efficiently remove it. In the present study it was found that some 18mer primers chosen for ORESTES library construction tended to target ribosomal regions, so they were not used again. However, it was impossible to predict in advance which primers would be problematic. The ‘other’ sequences had database matches but do not necessarily code for proteins, for example retrotransposon sequences. For each library, duplicate and ribosomal sequences were removed and the % redundancy per plate ranged from 9.6% to 71.9% (Table 1).
Table 2

Blast results summary. Breakdown of the types of sequences obtained from the B. glabrata ORESTES libraries identified with Blast searches of GenBank

All sequences
Non-redundant sequences
CategoryNo. sequences% sequencesNo. sequences% sequences
Protein90723.873940.1
Mitochondrial Protein40.140.2
Ribosomal Protein140.4110.6
Biomphalaria Protein350.9221.2
Biomphalaria fragment411.1402.2
Ribosomal148238.9442.4
Unknown (no BLAST match)110629.083245.1
Unknown EST842.2563.0
Unknown Protein1273.3884.8
Other80.270.4 


Total3809100.01843100.0
After removal of duplicate and ribosomal sequences, a total of 1843 non-redundant sequences were submitted to GenBank, ranging in size from 80 bp (shorter sequences were discarded) to 1068 bp, with a mean length of 518 bp. Cluster analysis between libraries (since the data were previously sifted to remove duplicate clones from each library) revealed 456 sequences in 163 clusters and 1387 singletons (Fig. 1). This resulted in 1550 unique sequences, with 15.9% redundancy. The most common sequence (in 12 of the libraries) was tropomyosin 2 (SwissProt accession number P43689), previously sequenced from B. glabrata [24], while two other common sequences (in 11 libraries) were a hypothetical integral membrane transporter protein (accession number XP_135742) and a sequence with no Blast match. Examining the Blast results from the 1843 non-redundant sequences (Table 2), 42% showed significant BlastX similarity to known proteins (including mitochondrial, ribosomal and Biomphalaria proteins) in the non-redundant databases, while 52.9% were of unknown function, 3.4% Biomphalaria sequences, 0.4% ‘other’ sequences (e.g. retrotransposons) and the remainder were ribosomal sequences (2.4%).
Fig. 1

Histogram showing EST clusters in the non-redundant EST set, after removal of duplicates within libraries.

Cluster analysis with other B. glabrata ESTs

Sequences from the 1843 ORESTES clones were used for BlastN searches of the other 10,791 B. glabrata EST sequences available on dbEST (September 2006) including many added since the sequences presented here. Four hundred and thirty-nine of the ESTs identified B. glabrata sequences with a match greater than 1e-20. Cluster analysis of these revealed 293 clusters or unique ESTs matched sequences on dbEST. Closer examination of a subset of 1613 sequences from a B. glabrata haemocyte cDNA library [17], created in the conventional way (not from ORESTES mini-libraries) showed only 31 ORESTES sequences clustered with transcripts sequenced from that library.

Functional classification based on gene ontology assignments

The functions of the non-redundant 1843 sequences were assessed using gene ontology, based on Blast matches with genes whose functions have been previously assessed (Fig. 2). Of the 1843 ESTs, 587 were assigned a function, in three categories, biological process, molecular function and cellular component. In the biological process categories, the largest proportion (44%) was assigned to physiological processes (Fig. 2a). The most prevalent molecular functions (Fig. 2b) were binding (36%) and catalytic activity (23%). Other molecular function assignments were signal transducers (8%) and transcription regulators (4%), and five antioxidant genes (0.4%) were also identified. Over 80% of the cellular component assignments were for genes coding for cellular proteins including 50% intracellular and 25% membrane proteins (Fig. 2c). Gene ontologies were examined to identify genes that were homologous to antioxidant molecules, signalling molecules, transcriptional regulators, immune response genes and stress response genes (Table 3), since many of these might be significant in the snail's response to parasite infection. A total of 117 homologues of genes that code for proteins involved in cell signalling or transcriptional regulation were identified; these genes were categorised as follows: signal transducers (54), cell–cell signalling (19), transcription regulator activity (28), signal transducers and transcription factor regulators (10) (Table 3). Although not the original purpose of generating these ESTs, gene ontologies were also assessed by tissue type, strain, parasite susceptibility and whether parasite exposed or unexposed, for both biological process and molecular function (see supplementary material).
Fig. 2

Gene ontologies. Percentage representation of gene ontology (GO) mappings for B. glabrata ESTs. (a) Biological processes, (b) molecular function and (c) cellular component. Note that individual GO categories can have multiple mappings and that the charts do not include ESTs with no blast/gene ontology matches.

Table 3

Transcripts selected by gene ontology. Individual B. glabrata ESTs that identified antioxidant proteins, signal transducers, transcription regulators and immune or stress response proteins

NameGenBank accessionGene ID (Blast result)aOrganismaBlast scorea
Antioxidant (GO:0016209)
3032HOUN59B8CV548777Peroxidasin (mKIAA0230) [BAC65505]M. musculus2E-23
1742HFEX1H9CK149203Dual oxidase 1 [Q8HZK3]S. scrofa2E-31
3017OTEX4H6CK149399Putative iron dependent peroxidase [Q8XGB1]S. typhi5E-15
1742OTEX5B12CK149417Putative iron dependent peroxidase [Q8XGB1]S. typhi7E-11
3032HAEMEX55E1CV548486Peroxinectin [AAL05973]P. monodon6E-17 


Signal transducers (GO: 0007165)
3032BEX52G8CV548350Filamin 1 [P21333]H. sapiens5E-53
1742BUN46B6CV548064Adenylyl cyclase [Q9QW33]Rattus sp.4E-78
3017OTUN34C11CO870317Ankyrin 2 (Brain ankyrin) [Q01484]H. sapiens2E-11
3017HFEX11B10CK149239Inhibitor of apoptosis protein [Q8UWD2]D. rerio4E-17
3032OTUN57G6CV548625Inhibitor of apoptosis protein [Q8UWD2]D. rerio4E-11
3017BEX49B1CV548199Buccalin precursor [P20481]A. californica5E-67
3032BEX52A2CV548323Buccalin precursor [P20481]A. californica2E-54
3032BEX52A12CV548364Buccalin precursor [P20481]A. californica2E-19
3032BUN58E5CV548692Buccalin precursor [P20481]A. californica5E-46
3032BUN58B9CV548713Buccalin precursor [P20481]A. californica2E-19
3032HAEMEX55A11CV548523cAMP-specific 3’,5’-cyclic phosphodiesterase [P12252]D. melanogaster2E-31
3032OTUN57A5CV548614Serine/threonine-protein kinase TNNI3 K (ANK repeats) [Q7TQP6]R. norvegicus1E-18
3032OTUN57B1CV548590Regulator of G-protein signalling 22 [Q9BYZ4]H. sapiens9E-22
3032HOUN59G3CV548755Bent (GH07636p) [Q9V4F7]D. melanogaster2E-19
3032HOUN59B1CV548737Bent (GH07636p) [Q9V4F7]D. melanogaster3E-76
3032HOEX53H6CV548394Elongation factor 1 alpha [P13549]X. laevis1E-48
3017BUN48A11CV548195FMRFamide neuropeptides [P19802]L. stagnalis4E-45
3032BUN58F5CV548693FMRFamide neuropeptides [P19802]L. stagnalis1E-34
3017OTEX17H11CK656694Myotilin (Titin immunoglobulin domain protein) [Q9UBF9]H. sapiens8E-13
3017HAEMUN28C9CO870195Protein kinase C inhibitor 1 (14-3-3-like) [P35214]H. sapiens3E-52
3032HFEX50F2CV548237Hemolectin [Q9U5D0]D. melanogaster2E-20
3032HFUN56E2CV548539Hemolectin [Q9U5D0]D. melanogaster2E-20
3032HFUN56B8CV548566Hemolectin [Q9U5D0]D. melanogaster4E-28
3017BEX49E3CV548205Molluscan insulin-related peptide 3 [P80090]L. stagnalis6E-13
3032HFUN56E6CV548560Multiple EGF-like-domain protein 3 [O75095]H. sapiens1E-30
3032HFUN56F9CV548575Multiple EGF-like-domain protein 3 [O75095]H. sapiens8E-24
3032HOUN59C2CV548745Nidogen 1 [P10493]M. musculus2E-23
3017HAEMEX19E1CK656743Feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor [Q9N1F2]F. catus2E-28
3017HOUN20E11CK656783PERQ amino acid rich, with GYF domain 1 [Q99MR1]M. musculus1E-23
3032HFEX50E11CV548269PERQ amino acid rich, with GYF domain 1 [Q99MR1]M. musculus1E-20
3017HFUN44E6CO870392Polycystic kidney disease protein 2 [Q7Z2B5]S. purpuratus9E-45
3032HOUN59B11CV548796Polydom protein precusor [Q9ES77]M. musculus3E-12
3017HAEMUN28F10CO870213Polyserase 1B protein [Q7Z410]H. sapiens3E-22
3017HAEMEX29B4CO870226Polyserase 1B protein [Q7Z410]H. sapiens1E-22
3032BEX52E7CV548346Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A [P11493]S. scrofa4E-63
3032OTUN57F6CV548624pRb-interacting protein RbBP-36 [Q8IZZ0]H. sapiens1E-20
3032BEX52H9CV548355Tyrosine phosphatase IA-2beta [Q9Y4I9]H. sapiens6E-57
3032BUN58D5CV548691Tyrosine phosphatase IA-2beta [Q9Y4I9]H. sapiens2E-46
3032OTUN57B12CV548658Muscle M-line assembly protein UNC-89 [O01761]C. elegans2E-12
3032HOUN59F4CV548760Muscle M-line assembly protein UNC-89 [O01761]C. elegans8E-25
3032HOEX53B12CV548417Muscle M-line assembly protein UNC-89 [O01761]C. elegans2E-20
1742HOUN8B5CK149518RAS related protein Rab21 [Q9UL25]H. sapiens3E-29
3017HFEX11H12CK149287RAS related protein Rab21 [Q9UL25]H. sapiens1E-29
1742HFEX1G2CK149192GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran [P79735]D. rerio2E-80
3017OTUN34B9CO870310Serine/threonine protein kinase SSTK [Q9BXA6]H. sapiens3E-18
3032BUN58F11CV548727E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD1 [Q9ULT8]H. sapiens6E-66
3032HOEX53G8CV548401SNF4/AMP-activated protein kinase gamma subunit [O96613]D. melanogaster2E-29
3017OTEX17B2CK656650Transportin-SR [Q9Y540]H. sapiens9E-58
1742HFEX1H2CK149197Twitchin [Q7YT99]M. galloprovincialis5E-28
3017BUN48G6CV548191Type N4 regulatory subunit of protein kinase A [P31319]A. californica1E-50
3032OTUN57C10CV548648Testis-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase [Q9WU22]M. musculus2E-66
1742HAEMEX7G1CK149506Integrin alpha 3 [Q86G86]P. includens8E-23
3032OTUN57G7CV548631Receptor type protein-tyrosine phosphatase T precursor [O14522]H. sapiens3E-16
3017HAEMEX19A3CK656730G protein-coupled receptor kinase type 2 [Q9U756]H. americanus3E-62
3017HFEX45B5CO870422Megalin [P98164]H. sapiens6E-20
1742OTEX5D3CK149425Activated protein kinase c receptor [Q9W7I1]X. laevis1E-114
1742OTEX5H8CK149451Activated protein kinase c receptor [Q9W7I1]X. laevis8E-24
3032HOUN59A5CV548763Receptor type guanylyl cyclase [Q9BPR0]B. mori1E-22
3032BUN58B3CV548678Soluble guanylyl cyclase alpha [Q7YW37]L. marginatus4E-63
1742HOEX9C10CK149566Collagen alpha 1(XIV) chain precusor (Undulin) [P32018]G. gallus7E-15
1742BEX47A12CV548175JNK interacting protein 1 [Q9W0K0]D. melanogaster4E-53
3032BUN58B11CV548723JNK interacting protein 1 [Q9W0K0]D. melanogaster5E-31
1742BEX47E10CV548166JNK interacting protein 1 [Q9W0K0]D. melanogaster2E-27
3032BUN58E4CV548685JNK interacting protein 1 [Q9W0K0]D. melanogaster8E-24
3032BUN58A3CV548677Serine/threonine kinase receptor type1 [O73801]T. rubripes1E-57
3032HFEX50H7CV548257Plectin [Q15149]H. sapiens8E-15
3032HOEX53F1CV548369Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) [Q9YHB9]X. laevis1E-56
3017HFEX11A5CK149232Src-family protein tyrosine kinase [Q8WQM5]S. purpuratus4E-51
3032HAEMEX55D11CV548524TNF receptor-associated factor 1 [Q13077]H. sapiens2E-27
3017HFEX45B8CO870431Epidermal growth factor precusor [P01133]H. sapiens7E-22
3017HFEX45A4CO870419Fibrillin [P35555]H. sapiens8E-26
3017HOUN32A5CO870241Macrophage mannose receptor [Q61830]M. musculus2E-14
3032HOEX53A1CV548367Macrophage mannose receptor [Q61830]M. musculus9E-23
1742HOUN8F1CK149540CYR61 protein precursor [Q9ES72]R. norvegicus4E-29
3017HAEMUN18E5CK656717Focal adhesion kinase [Q7Z1D3]L. variegatus1E-45 


Cell-cell signalling (GO: 0007267)
3032HAEMUN54B12CV548481Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor Dalpha6 [Q8T7S2]D. melanogaster1E-49
1742HOEX9F4CK149578Afadin (AF-6 protein) [P55196]H. sapiens2E-18
3017HAEMUN18H12CK656729Glutamate Receptor 2 [Q10914]C. elegans1E-15
3017HOUN20E9CK656782Bone morphogenetic protein 10 preproprotein [Q9R229]M. musculus3E-30
3017HOEX21A5CK656808Bone morphogenetic protein 10 preproprotein [Q9R229]M. musculus3E-30
3032HFUN56E10CV548580Clathrin heavy chain [P11442]H. sapiens1E-119
3032BEX52G5CV548337GABA Transaminase [P50554]R. norvegicus1E-28
3032BUN58G12CV548734Cadherin-related tumour suppressor [Q14517]H. sapiens4E-28
3017HFEX45B11CO870445Guanylate kinase associated protein [O14490]H. sapiens4E-22
1742BUN46F12CV548100Guanylate kinase associated protein [O14490]H. sapiens4E-21
3032HOUN59G12CV548804Synaptojanin 2 [O15056]H. sapiens5E-13
1742BUN46H8CV548080Kinesin-like protein KIF1A [Q12756]H. sapiens3E-30
1742BUN46F1CV548040Kinesin-like protein KIF1B [Q8R524]R. norvegicus1E-108
1742HFEX1H4CK149199Lethal giant larvae homolog 1 [O00188]H. sapiens7E-43
1742BUN46E9CV548085Prohormone convertase 2 (LPC2) [Q25409]L. stagnalis1E-128
3032BUN58A9CV548712Munc13-2 protein [Q62769]R. norvegicus1E-16
3017HFEX45B3CO870416Munc13-2 protein [Q62769]R. norvegicus3E-39
1742HOEX9G9CK149583Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase alpha-1 chain [Q9DGL6]D. rerio6E-81
3017BEX49D12CV548229Synaptotagmin 11 [O08835]R. norvegicus9E-50
3017BUN48C2CV548182Synaptotagmin 11 [O08835]R. norvegicus3E-33
3032BUN58D7CV548701Synaptotagmin 11 [O08835]R. norvegicus4E-34
3032OTUN57B8CV548634Tyrosine-protein kinase receptor [Q06807]B. taurus6E-61
3032BUN58C12CV548731Putative pyrokinin receptor [Q7RTK4]A. gambiae5E-26
1742BEX47H10CV548168Tryptophan hydroxylase [Q9NJQ3]L. stagnalis6E-41
3032BUN58D3CV548680Tryptophan hydroxylase [Q9NJQ3]L. stagnalis1E-40


Transcription regulator activity (GO: 0030528)
3017BEX49A4CV548206Eukaryotic translation intiation factor 3 subunit 10 [Q8I5S6]P. falciparum2E-21
3017OTEX17B6CK656654Calreticulin [Q26268]A. californica2E-63
1742HFEX1G4CK149194Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5 [Q8TDI0]H. sapiens7E-55
3017OTEX17C2CK656662C-terminal binding protein [O46036]D. melanogaster1E-79
1742HOUN8D7CK149529Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase [O04892]N. tabacum7E-21
1742HAEMUN10F7CK149220Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase [O04892]N. tabacum4E-17
1742HOUN8F12CK149546Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase [O04892]N. tabacum3E-15
3017HFEX45H10CO870443Elongation factor-2 [P13639]H. sapiens3E-49
3017OTUN16F11CK656633Embryonic ectoderm development protein [P97462]M. musculus2E-51
3032OTUN57E7CV548630HemK methyltransferase family member [Q9Y5R4]H. sapiens3E-30
3017OTUN34G10CO870315High mobility group protein [P40618]G. gallus2E-11
1742OTEX5D12CK149429Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 [Q9H2×6]H. sapiens1E-57
3017OTEX17A8CK656647Fragile-chorion membrane protein [P13709]D. melanogaster6E-27
1742BUN46A9CV548081LIM domain protein BX (BEADEX protein). [P91608]Drosophila sp.2E-60
1742BEX47F11CV548173LIM domain protein BX (BEADEX protein). [P91608]Drosophila sp.1E-60
3017HFEX45E11CO870447Max dimerization protein 1; mad [Q05195]H. sapiens7E-24
3032OTUN57C3CV548602Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia protein 2 [O14686]H. sapiens4E-59
3017HAEMUN28B11CO870190Bifunctional aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase [P28668]D. melanogaster2E-56
3017OTUN16C3EG030744Nuclear factor NF-kB1 [P25799]M. musculus1E-17
3017HFUN44C3CO870383LReO_3 protein [Q8UUM8]O. latipes4E-16
3032HOEX53E9CV548405LReO_3 protein [Q8UUM8]O. latipes1E-18
3032HFEX50B11CV548268LReO_3 protein [Q8UUM8]O. latipes2E-18
1742HOUN8F2CK149541LReO_3 protein [Q8UUM8]O. latipes2E-31
3017OTEX35D8CO870357Transcriptional activator protein Pur-alpha [P42669]M. musculus7E-31
1742HAEMUN10D9CK149214Retinoblastoma binding protein 5 [Q15291]H. sapiens1E-61
3032HFEX50F6CV548253Smad4 type2 [Q9W639]X. laevis7E-76
1742HAEMEX7F10CK149504Transcription elongation factor DSIF [O00267]H. sapiens1E-94
3017HOUN32D1CO870235Transcription elongation factor DSIF [O00267]H. sapiens8E-32
3032HOEX53F10CV548409RUSH-1 [Q95216]O. cuniculus9E-68
1742HFEX1H6CK149201Tis11 family protein [P47974]H. sapiens3E-36
3017HOEX33B8CO870263Transcription factor IID p80 chain homolog [Q91857]X. laevis2E-55
1742HFEX1C3CK149163Tropomyosin [O97192]H. aspersa6E-39
3017HOEX21A2CK656807Tropomyosin [O97192]H. aspersa1E-40
3017HFUN44E7CO870396Tropomyosin [O97192]H. aspersa7E-77
3032HAEMUN54H4CV548439Staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1 [Q7K2F4]H. sapiens3E-26
3032HAEMUN54E4CV548436Winged-helix repressor FOXP4 [Q8CIS1]M. musculus3E-12
3032HAEMUN54C3CV548430Jumonji domain containing protein 2C [Q9H3R0]H. sapiens5E-73


Signal transducers and transcription factor regulators (both GO: 0007165 and GO: 0030528)
1742OTEX5C1CK149418WDR9protein [Q9NSI6]H. sapiens1E-80
3017HFEX11G11CK149281Pliotropic regulator 1 [Q9WUC8]R. norvegicus2E-29
1742BUN46G3CV548048Transcriptional regulator ATRX protein [P46100]H. sapiens7E-90
1742BEX47D9CV548159Beta-catenin [P35224]U. caupo2E-34
3032HOEX53H9CV548408Beta-catenin [P35224]U. caupo2E-83
1742BUN46H7CV548074Fibropellin-1 [P10079]S. purpuratus1E-17
3032OTUN57B7CV548627HIRA protein [P54198]H. sapiens3E-68
1742OTEX5A12EG030742IKAP [O95163]H. sapiens4E-41
1742HFUN2A2CK149289Nuclear hormone receptor FTZ-F1 beta [Q05192]D. melanogaster2E-17
3032HOUN59B7CV548771Orphan nuclear receptor NR1D2 [Q14995]H. sapiens4E-25
1742OTEX5C2CK149419Histone-binding protein RBBP4 [Q09028]H. sapiens1E-131 


Immune response (GO: 0006955)
3032BUN58C5CV548690Alpha 2-macroglobulin [O01717]Limulus sp.5E-20
1742OTEX6D7CK149467Alpha-1 inhibitor III [Q62591]R. sordidus3E-16
1742BEX47H4CV548126ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 1 [Q8NE71]H. sapiens5E-56
1742HOUN8H9CK149553Paramyosin [O96064]M. galloprovincialis7E-61
3017OTUN16E12CK656627Exosome complex exonuclease RRP45 [Q9JHI7]M. musculus5E-73
3032BEX52B6CV548339Exosome complex exonuclease RRP45 [Q9JHI7]M. musculus2E-77
1742OTUN3F6CK149346J kappa-recombination signal binding protein [P31266]M. musculus2E-24
3017OTUN34C5CO870295Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4 [Q9NR80]H. sapiens4E-36
1742BEX47G7CV548147Soma ferritin [P42577]L. stagnalis7E-60
3032HFUN56G3CV548545Soma ferritin [P42577]L. stagnalis3E-59


Response to stress (GO: 0006950)
3017HOUN20F4CK65678660S acidic ribosomal protein P0 [Q9NHP0]S. crassipalpis9E-73
1742HOEX9H9CK149589Cdc7-related kinase [Q9Z2Y5]M. musculus4E-45
3032HAEMUN54A6CV548444ATP-dependent RNA helicase Ddx1 [Q9VNV3]D. melanogaster1E-60
3017OTUN34C6CO87029878 kDa glucose-regulated protein precursor [Q16956]A. californica2E-86
3017BUN48H5CV548188Helicase-like protein NHL [Q9NZ71]H. sapiens1E-25
3032OTUN57E6CV548623Hypoxia up-regulated 1 [Q9Y4L1]H. sapiens1E-38
3032HOEX53A9CV548403Mismatch repair protein pms1 homologue [Q8IBJ3]P. falciparum1E-14
3017HOEX33D3CO870252DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 [P40692]H. sapiens2E-25
1742OTEX6D1CK149464Polyubiquitin [P62988]H. sapiens2E-55
3017OTUN34G6CO870301Polyubiquitin [P62988]H. sapiens6E-85
1742HOUN8C5CK149524Polyubiquitin [P62988]H. sapiens8E-44

GenBank accession number, organism and E value given for the top match.

Functional classification based on KEGG pathway analysis

As an alternative method of categorising ESTs by biochemical function, clones were assigned to biochemical pathways using the KEGG website. Four hundred and thirteen ESTs were assigned to metabolic, genetic information processing, environmental information processing and cellular pathways (Tables 4 and 5). Thirty-one enzymes (38 clones) from 7 out of a possible 11 signal transduction pathways were identified as well as 25 enzymes (31 clones) from 7 out of a possible 9 immune-related pathways.

Discussion

Use of the ORESTES approach generated 1843 ESTs from different tissues and strains of B. glabrata. Only 3.4% of these had been previously characterized in B. glabrata and cluster analysis with other B. glabrata ESTs identified less than 300 clusters of overlapping sequences. Over half of the sequences showed no matches to previously sequenced genes in the non-redundant section of GenBank. Functional analysis of those with sequence similarity to previously characterized genes, using gene ontologies and KEGG assignments identified a number of antioxidant, signalling and transcriptional regulatory genes, molecules that may potentially be involved in snail/parasite interactions, as well as several immune and stress response proteins.

Antioxidant proteins

Four different genes were identified that were similar to molecules that demonstrate antioxidant functions in other organisms. Peroxinectin (CV548486) is a cell adhesion protein with peroxidase activity, which has been identified in other invertebrates including the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus [25], the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon [26], Drosophila melanogaster [27] and the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei [28], and is a functional equivalent of the vertebrate myeloperoxidase [25,29]. Peroxidasin (CV548777) is a similar protein with peroxidase activity associated with developmental processes in both Drosophila [30] and Xenopus tropicalis [31]. Dual oxidase 1 (Duox1) (CK149203), possesses a peroxidase domain and is thus categorized with antioxidant function; interestingly though, these transmembrane proteins also have a superoxide-generating subunit homologous to glycoprotein p91phox [32], a host defence molecule that generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) [33,34]. Another Duox1 sequence has been identified in B. glabrata [17] but our sequence (CK149203) seems to be a paralog of this gene as it shows no similarity at the nucleotide level with the other sequences (CK989379, CK990069) and did not identify these sequences in BlastN searches, despite all matching the same section of translated protein in tBlastX searches.

Signalling molecules and transcriptional regulators

Based on our knowledge of other, well-characterised, biological systems, some of the identified signalling molecules and transcriptional regulators play a part in pathways that are likely to be involved in the innate immune response of snails. In a few cases (as described below), functional studies have shown that such signalling pathways contribute to the regulation of molluscan defence reactions. One clone (EG030744) matched the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB1 (NF-κB1), a p105 NF-κB subunit that is proteolytically processed to yield NF-κB p50 [35]. The NF-κB/Rel transcription factors comprise a family of evolutionarily conserved and structurally related proteins identified in a variety of vertebrates and invertebrates including the beetle Allomyrina dichotoma [36], the sea squirt Ciona intestinalis [37] and the bivalve mollusc Crassostrea gigas [38]. Such transcription factors are central to the NF-κB pathway, a key intracellular pathway that co-ordinates the induction of defence genes in both mammals and Drosophila, and plays a pivotal role in vertebrate and invertebrate innate immunity [39,40]. IκB kinase (IKK) complex associated protein (IKAP) [41] was also identified (EG030742). This protein contains potential IKK association sites and was thus originally thought to play a role in NF-κB signalling by scaffolding the IKK signalsome [41]. Although this now seems unlikely (as discussed in [42]) IKAP seems to associate with stress-activated protein kinase/c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) and regulate its activity in mammals [42]. Activation of SAPK/JNK occurs via the transmission of extracellular stress signals, and aside from the role that this protein plays in processes such as development, apoptosis, and proliferation, it can regulate immune responses in Drosophila [43,44]. Interestingly, SAPK/JNK is activated by recombinant human TNF-α in defence cells (haemocytes) of the bivalve mollusc Mytilus galloprovincialis [45] and, in the present study, we identified a homologue (clones CV548175, CV548723, CV548166, CV548685) of Drosophila JNK interacting protein 1 [46], a scaffold protein that aggregates specific components to form a functional SAPK/JNK signalling module in mammals [47]. Homologues of invertebrate integrin α3 [48] (CK149506), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [49] (CK656717) and mammalian protein tyrosine kinase Src [50] (CK149232) were also identified. Integrins are a family of heterodimeric, transmembrane adhesion receptors whose ligand specificities are determined by the specific α and β subunits; integrins are crucial to cell adhesion and organisation of the actin cytoskeleton and they serve as important receptors in immune cell responses, cell migration and tissue integrity. Expressed in all metazoans, integrins have been characterized in several invertebrates [51], with β1 integrin subunits reported from haemocytes of the molluscs C. gigas [52] and B. glabrata [53]. Integrins nucleate the formation of focal adhesions and focal complexes and these events rely on the co-ordinated actions of signalling proteins that include FAK and Src. In mammals, integrin clustering is known to lead to autophosphorylation of FAK at Tyr397, FAK then associates with the SH2 domain of Src, which in turn phosphorylates FAK at Tyr925 [54]. In some cell types this can result in downstream signalling to the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway [55], a signalling module that has been shown to regulate phagocytosis and nitric oxide production in haemocytes from L. stagnalis [56,57]. A recent study has demonstrated that integrin engagement results in increased phosphorylation of a FAK-like protein in L. stagnalis haemocytes and that integrin blockade inhibits phagocytosis and spreading by these cells [58]. Since integrins are also known to regulate cell spreading by haemocytes of B. glabrata [59] it appears that integrin binding is crucial to the defence responses of snails, particularly those involving actin remodelling. Thus, signalling through the identified FAK/Src proteins is likely to regulate such defence reactions, as has been shown in insects [60]. Protein kinase C (PKC) is known to play a role in regulating innate defences in mammals; this has also been documented for snails in which PKC seems to regulate nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production, phagocytosis and cell spreading by haemocytes [56,57,61,62]. In this context, it is interesting that we have now identified homologues of two proteins, activated protein kinase C receptor (RACK) (CK149425, CK149451) from Xenopus [63] and 14-3-3 γ (CO870195) from humans [64], which are known to interact with PKC. RACK has previously been characterized in B. glabrata by other workers [65], however, the nucleotide sequence fragment we identified differs significantly from that previously published, with only three short stretches being identified in a BlastN search with an E value of 3e-5. BlastX searches did identify (amongst other RACK sequences) the amino acid sequence of the previously sequenced B. glabrata RACK, with 89% similarity. Our nucleotide sequence also identified 12 other B. glabrata ESTs with close homology, so it seems likely that we have identified a second gene for RACK. 14-3-3 γ appears to be phosphorylated by PKC and might facilitate signalling to the ERK pathway via Raf [64]. Biomphalaria glabrata RACK might serve to direct the translocation of PKC isoforms to specific cellular compartments as it does in higher organisms [66]. We also identified a homologue of the B (regulatory) subunit of serine threonine protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [67] (CV548346), a heterotrimeric holoenzyme that either positively or negatively regulates the activities of wide variety of cellular signal transduction pathways including those involving IKK and ERK discussed above (for reviews see [68,69]). Also of interest are genes that were found to be homologous to those coding for proteins involved in protein kinase A and cAMP signalling, namely: adenylyl cyclase [70] (CV548064), the enzyme that generates the second messenger cAMP; cAMP-specific 3′,5′-cyclic phosphodiesterase (CV548523), an enzyme involved in cyclic nucleotide metabolism [71]; and the type N4 regulatory subunit of PKA [72] (CV548191). These proteins likely play a role in mollusc defence since the catecholamine noradrenaline modulates the phagocytic activity of C. gigas haemocytes via a β-adrenergic receptor-cAMP signalling pathway [73]. Finally, genes were found which matched to those of the transmembrane glycoprotein macrophage mannose receptor [74] (CO870241, CV548367), the Ras-related GTPase protein Rab 21 [75] (CK149518, CK149287) and hemolectin [76] (CV548237, CV548539, CV548566). The macrophage mannose receptor is a phagocytic receptor that targets pathogens such as bacteria and yeast which express mannose-rich glycoproteins [74] and Rab 21 has been recently found to interact with two LIM domain proteins in the slime mould Dictyostelium to collectively regulate phagocytosis [77]. The identified hemolectin showed homology to Drosophila hemolectin which is a major clot constituent in these flies [76].

Immune and stress response genes

Examination of the gene ontologies revealed 8 immune response genes and 10 response-to-stress genes. Of particular interest are α 2-macroglobulin (α2 M) and Rho-guanine nucleotide-exchange factor 4 (Rho-GEF 4). The identified α2 M (CV548690) is similar to that from the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus [78], a proteinase inhibitor similar to mammalian α2 M with broad reactivity towards proteinases; a similar inhibitor with activity towards serine, cysteine and metalloproteinase has been purified from B. glabrata plasma [79]. Such inhibitors could be important to defence, since they may be expressed during the humoral immune response in order to inactivate proteinases produced by invading pathogens [80]. The Rho-GEF 4 homologue (CO870295) was similar to that sequenced in humans [81]. This GEF is operational towards the small GTPases Rho A and Rac 1 and is thought to play a role in cell migration and cell–cell adhesion [82]. Given the universal nature of these cellular processes it is likely that Rho GEF 4 has a similar role in snails and thus may be important in the snail defence response towards pathogens.

Conclusions

The genes described above represent a set of those identified that might play important roles in molluscan defence. To eliminate pathogens such as parasites, the molluscan immune system must be able to mount a co-ordinated response to the invading organism, with processes such as cell adhesion and the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates being crucial to the outcome of infection. Despite a parasite-mediated interference theory being proposed 25 years ago [83], the precise mechanism(s) by which schistosomes evade the defence response of their snail intermediate hosts remain largely unknown. A recent hypothesis paper has explored the idea that parasites might blunt the defence response of susceptible snails by interfering with key signal transduction pathways in their defence cells [84]; such a strategy could serve to alter gene expression and functional defence responses. This EST gene discovery project has provided a significant number of genes for the first version of a custom B. glabrata cDNA microarray. A detailed investigation of the transcriptome in response to trematode infection in this snail intermediate host, in order to identify and understand the role of specific genes involved in the snail internal defence system can therefore now be carried out. Thus, we anticipate that through application of the microarray, we will move closer to gaining a comprehensive understanding of snail–schistosome interactions and the complex nature of the biological interplay that exists between snail and schistosome parasite.
Table 4

KEGG pathways identified by B. glabrata ESTs

KEGG categories representedEnzymesaClonesb
1Metabolism
1.1Carbohydrate metabolism
1.1.1Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis712
1.1.3Pentose phosphate pathway45
1.1.5Fructose and mannose metabolism12
1.1.6Galactose metabolism22
1.1.7Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism34
1.1.8Starch and sucrose metabolism612
1.1.9Aminosugars metabolism11
1.1.11Pyruvate metabolism45
1.1.12Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism11
1.1.13Propanoate metabolism22
1.1.14Butanoate metabolism55
1.1.17Inositol phosphate metabolism11


1.2Energy metabolism
1.2.1Oxidative phosphorylation77
1.2.2ATP synthesis11
1.2.4Carbon fixation37
1.2.6Methane metabolism22
1.2.7Nitrogen metabolism11


1.3Lipid metabolism
1.3.1Fatty acid biosynthesis11
1.3.2Fatty acid elongation in mitochondria12
1.3.3Fatty acid metabolism22
1.3.4Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies11
1.3.6Bile acid biosynthesis11
1.3.9Glycerolipid metabolism11
1.3.10Glycerophospholipid metabolism22


1.4Nucleotide metabolism
1.4.1Purine metabolism68
1.4.2Pyrimidine metabolism34


1.5Amino acid metabolism
1.5.1Glutamate metabolism22
1.5.2Alanine and aspartate metabolism11
1.5.3Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism46
1.5.4Methionine metabolism12
1.5.6Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation22
1.5.7Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis23
1.5.8Lysine biosynthesis11
1.5.9Lysine degradation22
1.5.10Arginine and proline metabolism57
1.5.11Histidine metabolism23
1.5.12Tyrosine metabolism23
1.5.13Phenylalanine metabolism22
1.5.14Tryptophan metabolism56
1.5.15Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis23
1.5.16Urea cycle and metabolism of amino groups34


1.6Metabolism of other amino acids
1.6.1β-alanine metabolism34
1.6.3Aminophosphonate metabolism12
1.6.4Selenoamino acid metabolism12


1.7Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
1.7.1N-Glycan biosynthesis11
1.7.3N-Glycan degradation11
1.7.4O-Glycan biosynthesis11
1.7.12Glycosphingolipid metabolism11


1.8Biosynthesis of polyketides and nonribosomal peptides
1.8.3Biosynthesis of ansamycins11


1.9Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
1.9.3Vitamin B6 metabolism22
1.9.6Biotin metabolism11
1.9.7Folate biosynthesis38
1.9.10Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism34
1.9.11Ubiquinone biosynthesis44


1.10Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites
1.10.4Limonene and pinene degradation22
1.10.6Stilbene, coumarine and lignin biosynthesis34
1.10.8Alkaloid biosynthesis I12
1.10.12Streptomycin biosynthesis11


1.11Biodegradation of xenobiotics
1.11.4γ-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation22
1.11.53-chloroacrylic acid degradation12
1.11.61,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) degradation12
1.11.81,2-dichloroethane degradation11
1.11.14Fluorene degradation23
1.11.17Benzoate degradation via hydroxylation12
1.11.18Atrazine degradation11
1.11.201- and 2-methylnaphthalene degradation12


2Genetic information processing
2.1Transcription
2.1.2RNA polymerase11
2.1.3Basal transcription factors22


2.2Translation
2.2.2Ribosome2027
2.2.3Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis1635


2.3Folding, sorting and degradation
2.3.1Protein export23
2.3.2Type II secretion system11
2.3.7Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis34
2.3.8Proteasome711


3Environmental information processing
3.1Membrane transport
3.1.1ABC transporters1523


3.2Signal transduction
3.2.1Two-component system33
3.2.2MAPK signalling pathway47
3.2.3Wnt signalling pathway66
3.2.4Notch signalling pathway11
3.2.6TGF-β signalling pathway55
3.2.9Calcium signalling pathway1014
3.2.10Phosphatidylinositol signalling system22


3.3Signalling molecules and interaction
3.3.1Neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction1720
3.3.2Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction33
3.3.3ECM–receptor interaction57
3.3.4Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)2536


4Cellular processes
4.1Cell motility
4.1.3Regulation of actin cytoskeleton1537


4.2Cell growth and death
4.2.1Cell cycle55
4.2.2Apoptosis611


4.3Cell communication
4.3.1Focal adhesion1326
4.3.2Adherens junction816
4.3.3Tight junction921
4.3.4Gap junction625


4.4Endocrine system
4.4.1Insulin signalling pathway68
4.4.2Adipocytokine signalling pathway33


4.5Immune system
4.5.1Hematopoietic cell lineage22
4.5.2Complement and coagulation cascades57
4.5.3Toll-like receptor signalling pathway11
4.5.4Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity22
4.5.6T cell receptor signalling pathway22
4.5.7B cell receptor signalling pathway67
4.5.9Leukocyte transendothelial migration710
4.8Development
4.8.2Axon guidance710


4.9Behaviour
4.9.1Circadian rhythm37

Enzymes—the number of enzymes from each pathway that were identified.

Clones—the number of ORESTES clones that identified enzymes.

Table 5

Summary of KEGG pathways identified by B. glabrata ESTs

Pathways representedTotal possibleEnzymes identifiedNo. EST clones
Metabolic pathway
1.1Carbohydrate metabolism13173752
1.2Energy metabolism581418
1.3Lipid metabolism712910
1.4Nucleotide metabolism22912
1.5Amino acid metabolism15163647
1.6Metabolism of other amino acids3958
1.7Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism41944
1.8Biosynthesis of polyketides and nonribosomal peptides1911
1.9Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins5111319
1.10Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites41679
1.11Biodegradation of xenobiotics8211015


67140145195


Genetic information processing
2.1Transcription2333
2.2Translation233662
2.3Folding, sorting and degradation481319
2.4Replication and repair0100


8155284


Environmental information processing
3.1Membrane transport121523
3.2Signal transduction7113138
3.3Signalling molecules and interaction445066


121796127


Cellular processes
4.1Cell motility131537
4.2Cell growth and death221116
4.3Cell communication443688
4.4Endocrine system23911
4.5Immune system792531
4.6Nervous system0200
4.7Sensory system0200
4.8Development12710
4.9Behaviour1137


1828106200
  82 in total

1.  Expression of Rab small GTPases in epithelial Caco-2 cells: Rab21 is an apically located GTP-binding protein in polarised intestinal epithelial cells.

Authors:  F J Opdam; G Kamps; H Croes; H van Bokhoven; L A Ginsel; J A Fransen
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) expression and phosphorylation in sea urchin embryos.

Authors:  María Guadalupe García; Sarah Johnson Toney; Merrill B Hille
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.224

3.  Cloning of the p50 DNA binding subunit of NF-kappa B: homology to rel and dorsal.

Authors:  S Ghosh; A M Gifford; L R Riviere; P Tempst; G P Nolan; D Baltimore
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Purification and characterization of a tetrameric alpha-macroglobulin proteinase inhibitor from the gastropod mollusc Biomphalaria glabrata.

Authors:  R C Bender; C J Bayne
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  Anchoring proteins for protein kinase C: a means for isozyme selectivity.

Authors:  D Mochly-Rosen; A S Gordon
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  An expressed sequence tag survey of gene expression in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis, an intermediate vector of trematodes [corrected].

Authors:  A Davison; M L Blaxter
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Integrin engagement modulates the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, phagocytosis, and cell spreading in molluscan defence cells.

Authors:  Louise D Plows; Richard T Cook; Angela J Davies; Anthony J Walker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-08

8.  Identification of transcripts generated during the response of resistant Biomphalaria glabrata to Schistosoma mansoni infection using suppression subtractive hybridization.

Authors:  Thomas S Nowak; Amanda C Woodards; Younghun Jung; Coen M Adema; Eric S Loker
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Schistosoma mansoni: comparison of cloned tropomyosin antigens shared between adult parasites and Biomphalaria glabrata.

Authors:  D S Weston; W M Kemp
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.011

10.  Characterization of the murine macrophage mannose receptor: demonstration that the downregulation of receptor expression mediated by interferon-gamma occurs at the level of transcription.

Authors:  N Harris; M Super; M Rits; G Chang; R A Ezekowitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  34 in total

1.  Time series analysis of the transcriptional responses of Biomphalaria glabrata throughout the course of intramolluscan development of Schistosoma mansoni and Echinostoma paraensei.

Authors:  Patrick C Hanington; Cheng-Man Lun; Coen M Adema; Eric S Loker
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Differential transcriptomic responses of Biomphalaria glabrata (Gastropoda, Mollusca) to bacteria and metazoan parasites, Schistosoma mansoni and Echinostoma paraensei (Digenea, Platyhelminthes).

Authors:  Coen M Adema; Patrick C Hanington; Cheng-Man Lun; George H Rosenberg; Anthony D Aragon; Barbara A Stout; Mara L Lennard Richard; Paul S Gross; Eric S Loker
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.407

3.  Construction of a medicinal leech transcriptome database and its application to the identification of leech homologs of neural and innate immune genes.

Authors:  Eduardo R Macagno; Terry Gaasterland; Lee Edsall; Vineet Bafna; Marcelo B Soares; Todd Scheetz; Thomas Casavant; Corinne Da Silva; Patrick Wincker; Aurélie Tasiemski; Michel Salzet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Pathogen-associated molecular patterns activate expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, immunity and detoxification in the amebocyte-producing organ of the snail Biomphalaria glabrata.

Authors:  Si-Ming Zhang; Eric S Loker; John T Sullivan
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni proteins released during in vitro miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Wu; Greg Sabat; James F Brown; Mengzi Zhang; Andrew Taft; Nathan Peterson; Amy Harms; Timothy P Yoshino
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 6.  Digenean-gastropod host associations inform on aspects of specific immunity in snails.

Authors:  C M Adema; E S Loker
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Schistosomin from the snail Biomphalaria glabrata: expression studies suggest no involvement in trematode-mediated castration.

Authors:  Si-Ming Zhang; Hong Nian; Bo Wang; Eric S Loker; Coen M Adema
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 8.  Successful parasitism of vector snail Biomphalaria glabrata by the human blood fluke (trematode) Schistosoma mansoni: a 2009 assessment.

Authors:  Christopher J Bayne
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Transcriptome analysis of Taenia solium cysticerci using Open Reading Frame ESTs (ORESTES).

Authors:  Carolina R Almeida; Patricia H Stoco; Glauber Wagner; Thaís Cm Sincero; Gianinna Rotava; Ethel Bayer-Santos; Juliana B Rodrigues; Maísa M Sperandio; Antônio Am Maia; Elida Pb Ojopi; Arnaldo Zaha; Henrique B Ferreira; Kevin M Tyler; Alberto Mr Dávila; Edmundo C Grisard; Emmanuel Dias-Neto
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Biomphalaria glabrata transcriptome: cDNA microarray profiling identifies resistant- and susceptible-specific gene expression in haemocytes from snail strains exposed to Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Anne E Lockyer; Jenny Spinks; Richard A Kane; Karl F Hoffmann; Jennifer M Fitzpatrick; David Rollinson; Leslie R Noble; Catherine S Jones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.