Literature DB >> 17207339

High rate of biological loss in assisted reproduction: it is in the seed, not in the soil.

P Patrizio1, V Bianchi, M D Lalioti, T Gerasimova, D Sakkas.   

Abstract

The vast majority of embryos produced in vitro and transferred fail to develop into an infant, supporting the concept that only a small fraction of embryos is destined to become a live birth. One of the main reasons for such a low embryo-to-infant ratio is the remarkably high number of embryos that after preimplantation genetic diagnosis are found to have a chromosome imbalance. This study reports the overall biological wastage from oocytes inseminated to ongoing pregnancies in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) because of advanced age, recurrent pregnancy losses or multiple failed IVF cycles. The analysis of biological wastage per oocyte showed that in this cohort of patients, of 333 eggs inseminated, 183 (55.0%) provided embryos for biopsy, and of these, only 33 (18.0% per embryo and 9.9% per oocyte) were normal. A total of 26 embryos were suitable for transfer (14% per embryo and 7.8% per oocyte), but only five (1.5%) implanted and three (1.0%) resulted in live births. In conclusion, there is enormous biological wastage during assisted reproduction, and the data obtained from both embryos and oocytes of patients undergoing PGS support the concept that many embryos and eggs obtained during IVF are intrinsically abnormal and thus fail to implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207339     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60769-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  12 in total

1.  Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.

Authors:  Monika Chawla; Michael Fakih; Amal Shunnar; Asina Bayram; Ali Hellani; Vanamail Perumal; Jayprakash Divakaran; Erdal Budak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Improving IVF: is there a limit to our ability to manipulate human biology?

Authors:  Pasquale Patrizio; Sherman Silber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is vanishing twin syndrome associated with adverse obstetric outcomes of ART singletons? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Li; Tian-Ze Sun; Mo-Qi Lv; Liang Zhou; Pan Ge; Hao-Nan Li; Dang-Xia Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Sperm count affects cumulative birth rate of assisted reproduction cycles in relation to ovarian response.

Authors:  Carlotta Zacà; Giovanni Coticchio; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Andrea Garolla; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA.

Authors:  Sanaz Ghazal; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Reproductive outcome of women 43 years and beyond undergoing ART treatment with their own oocytes in two Connecticut university programs.

Authors:  Mehmet B Cetinkaya; Linda J Siano; Claudio Benadiva; Denny Sakkas; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The total pregnancy potential per oocyte aspiration after assisted reproduction-in how many cycles are biologically competent oocytes available?

Authors:  J G Lemmen; N M Rodríguez; L D Andreasen; A Loft; S Ziebe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Frequency of chromosomal aneuploidy in high quality embryos from young couples using preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  Farzaneh Fesahat; Fatemeh Montazeri; Mohammad Hasan Sheikhha; Hojjatollah Saeedi; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Seyed Mehdi Kalantar
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-05

9.  Reproductive efficiency of human oocytes fertilized in vitro.

Authors:  H W Jones; S Oehninger; S Bocca; L Stadtmauer; J Mayer
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010

10.  Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Christos A Venetis; Human M Fatemi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Robert Fischer; Yulia Koloda; Marcos Horton; Michael Grynberg; Salvatore Longobardi; Sandro C Esteves; Sesh K Sunkara; Yuan Li; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.