Literature DB >> 17207257

Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and near-isogenic non-Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure.

Bryan S Griffiths1, Lars-Henrik Heckmann, Sandra Caul, Jacqueline Thompson, Charlie Scrimgeour, Paul Henning Krogh.   

Abstract

A glasshouse experiment was undertaken to provide baseline data on the variation between conventional maize (Zea mays L.) varieties and genetically modified maize plants expressing the insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis protein (Bt, Cry1Ab). The objective was to determine whether the variation in soil parameters under a range of conventional maize cultivars exceeded the differences between Bt and non-Bt maize cultivars. Variations in plant growth parameters (shoot and root biomass, percentage carbon, percentage nitrogen), Bt protein concentration in shoots, roots and soil, soil nematode abundance and soil microbial community structure were determined. Eight paired varieties (i.e. varieties genetically modified to express Bt protein and their near-isogenic control varieties) were investigated, together with a Bt variety for which no near-isogenic control was available (NX3622, a combined transformant expressing both Bt and herbicide tolerance) and a conventional barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) variety which was included as a positive control. The only plant parameter which showed a difference between Bt varieties and near-isogenic counterparts was the shoot carbon to nitrogen ratio; this was observed for only two of the eight varieties, and so was not attributable to the Bt trait. There were no detectable differences in the concentration of Bt protein in plant or soil with any of the Bt-expressing varieties. There were significant differences in the abundance of soil nematodes, but this was not related to the Bt trait. Differences in previously published soil nematode studies under Bt maize were smaller than these varietal effects. Soil microbial community structure, as determined by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, was strongly affected by plant growth stage but not by the Bt trait. The experimental addition of purified Cry1Ab protein to soil confirmed that, at ecologically relevant concentrations, there were no measurable effects on microbial community structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207257     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  9 in total

1.  Advances in genome studies: The PAG 2010 conference.

Authors:  R Appels; R Barrerro; G Keeble; M Bellgard
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Lee; Chang-Gi Kim; Hojeong Kang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Laboratory assessment of the impacts of transgenic Bt rice on the ecological fitness of the soil non-target arthropod, Folsomia candida (Collembola: Isotomidae).

Authors:  Yiyang Yuan; Nengwen Xiao; Paul Henning Krogh; Fajun Chen; Feng Ge
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Gene expression profiles of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties cultured in the field are more similar than are those of conventional lines.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Rosa Collado; Gemma Capellades; Joaquima Messeguer; Enric Melé; Montserrat Palaudelmàs; Maria Pla
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  The Cry1Ab Protein Has Minor Effects on the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities after Five Seasons of Continuous Bt Maize Cultivation.

Authors:  Huilan Zeng; Fengxiao Tan; Yinghua Shu; Yanyan Zhang; Yuanjiao Feng; Jianwu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cry1Ac Transgenic Sugarcane Does Not Affect the Diversity of Microbial Communities and Has No Significant Effect on Enzyme Activities in Rhizosphere Soil within One Crop Season.

Authors:  Dinggang Zhou; Liping Xu; Shiwu Gao; Jinlong Guo; Jun Luo; Qian You; Youxiong Que
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Annual replication is essential in evaluating the response of the soil microbiome to the genetic modification of maize in different biogeographical regions.

Authors:  Márton Szoboszlay; Astrid Näther; Ewen Mullins; Christoph C Tebbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Insect-Resistant Maize 2A-7 Expressing mCry1Ab and mCry2Ab on the Soil Ecosystem.

Authors:  Shuke Yang; Xin Liu; Xiaohui Xu; Hongwei Sun; Fan Li; Chaofeng Hao; Xingbo Lu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26

9.  A Three-Year Plant Study of Salt-Tolerant Transgenic Maize Showed No Effects on Soil Enzyme Activity and Nematode Community.

Authors:  Xing Zeng; Tongtong Pei; Yongfeng Song; Pei Guo; Huilan Zhang; Xin Li; Hao Li; Hong Di; Zhenhua Wang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.