Literature DB >> 36173548

Spinal Injuries in the Overhead Athlete.

Robert G Watkins2, David Chang2, Robert G Watkins2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Treatment of overhead athletes requires a systematic approach that will make an accurate diagnosis, deliver effective treatment, and make timely and safe return to sport. RECENT
FINDINGS: New data has shown success rates and return to play effectiveness after different types of cervical and lumbar surgery. Cervical foraminotomy has been shown to have the highest rate and fastest return to play, but with the highest incidence of need for revision surgery. Cervical artificial disc replacement has shown promising results in the general population and is being done more commonly in elite athletes, but has an unknown risk for failure. Cervical fusion is a well-established and effective treatment, but has the longest healing time and risk for adjacent level pathology. In the lumbar spine, discectomy has a long and proven track record, fusion is rarely performed but can be effective, and artificial disc replacement is extremely rare in an elite athlete. An effective and comprehensive approach can diagnose, treat, and return overhead athletes to competitive play.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Athlete; Cervical; Lumbar; Overhead; Spine; Sport

Year:  2022        PMID: 36173548     DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09791-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  43 in total

Review 1.  Nonoperative treatment of neck and arm pain.

Authors:  S J Dreyer; S D Boden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Exercise only, exercise with mechanical traction, or exercise with over-door traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with or without consideration of status on a previously described subgrouping rule: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Anne Thackeray; Gerard P Brennan; John D Childs
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 3.  Cervical Disc Herniations, Radiculopathy, and Myelopathy.

Authors:  Robert G Watkins; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Chronic cervical radiculopathy: lateral-approach periradicular corticosteroid injection.

Authors:  J N Vallée; A Feydy; R Y Carlier; C Mutschler; D Mompoint; C A Vallée
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

6.  Cervical Radiculopathy: Diagnosis and Nonoperative Management.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  A comparison of T2 and gadolinium enhanced MRI with CT myelography in cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  R J Bartlett; C R Hill; E Gardiner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Tim Yoon; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Cervical radiculopathy: value of oblique MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; G P Mulopulos; C V Bundschuh; H Bohlman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ian A Young; Lori A Michener; Joshua A Cleland; Arnold J Aguilera; Alison R Snyder
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.