Literature DB >> 17205001

Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate.

Ann B Hamric1, Leslie J Blackhall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore registered nurses' and attending physicians' perspectives on caring for dying patients in intensive care units (ICUs), with particular attention to the relationships among moral distress, ethical climate, physician/nurse collaboration, and satisfaction with quality of care.
DESIGN: Descriptive pilot study using a survey design.
SETTING: Fourteen ICUs in two institutions in different regions of Virginia.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine attending physicians who admitted patients to the ICUs and 196 registered nurses engaged in direct patient care.
INTERVENTIONS: Survey questionnaire.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the first site, registered nurses reported lower collaboration (p<.001), higher moral distress (p<.001), a more negative ethical environment (p<.001), and less satisfaction with quality of care (p=.005) than did attending physicians. The highest moral distress situations for both registered nurses and physicians involved those situations in which caregivers felt pressured to continue unwarranted aggressive treatment. Nurses perceived distressing situations occurring more frequently than did physicians. At the second site, 45% of the registered nurses surveyed reported having left or considered leaving a position because of moral distress. For physicians, collaboration related to satisfaction with quality of care (p<.001) and ethical environment (p=.004); for nurses, collaboration was related to satisfaction (p<.001) and ethical climate (p<.001) at both sites and negatively related to moral distress at site 2 (p=.05). Overall, registered nurses with higher moral distress scores had lower satisfaction with quality of care (p<.001), lower perception of ethical environment (p<.001), and lower perception of collaboration (p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Registered nurses experienced more moral distress and lower collaboration than physicians, they perceived their ethical environment as more negative, and they were less satisfied with the quality of care provided on their units than were physicians. Provider assessments of quality of care were strongly related to perception of collaboration. Improving the ethical climate in ICUs through explicit discussions of moral distress, recognition of differences in nurse/physician values, and improving collaboration may mitigate frustration arising from differences in perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205001     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254722.50608.2D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  103 in total

Review 1.  [Ethical aspects in end-of-life care].

Authors:  F Nauck
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Empirical research on moral distress: issues, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ann B Hamric
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-03

3.  Pacemaker deactivation: withdrawal of support or active ending of life?

Authors:  Thomas S Huddle; F Amos Bailey
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-12

4.  Comparing clinician ratings of the quality of palliative care in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lawrence A Ho; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Judith Nelson; John Luce; Daniel E Ray; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Perceptions of "futile care" among caregivers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Robert Sibbald; James Downar; Laura Hawryluck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Decision support in multi-professional communication.

Authors:  Scott Weber; Karen L Courtney; Mary Benham-Hutchins
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Moral distress reexamined: a feminist interpretation of nurses' identities, relationships, and responsibilites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peter; Joan Liaschenko
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 8.  Moral distress in medical education and training.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Berger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel D A Havyer; Majken T Wingo; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Factors Associated with Physician Moral Distress Caring for Hospitalized Elderly Patients Needing a Surrogate Decision-maker: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Lucia D Wocial; James E Slaven; Kianna Montz; Patrick O Monahan; Susan E Hickman; Christopher M Callahan; Paul R Helft; Greg A Sachs; Lev Inger; Emily S Burke; Alexia M Torke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.