Literature DB >> 19238897

Decision support in multi-professional communication.

Scott Weber1, Karen L Courtney, Mary Benham-Hutchins.   

Abstract

This paper explores the role of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in facilitating communication between physicians, nurses, patients and family members. Thirty-three critical care unit nurses and physicians were interviewed regarding the APACHE III CDSS. This qualitative, descriptive study suggests that registered nurses and physicians are primarily motivated to use CDSS when this technology allows them to forecast the potential outcomes of decisions prior to actually making those decisions. These forecasts are used to advocate for care decisions with other disciplines, patients and their family members. Implications for professional practice and recommendations for future research are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238897     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  22 in total

1.  Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Rhona Flin; Brian H Cuthbertson
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  Critical care nurses, ethical decision-making and stress.

Authors:  J A Erlen; S M Sereika
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Lessons from evaluating an automated patient severity index.

Authors:  R F Gibson; P J Haug; S D Horn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The doctor-nurse game.

Authors:  L I Stein
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1967-06

5.  Comparison of APACHE II and III scoring systems for mortality prediction in critical surgical illness.

Authors:  P S Barie; L J Hydo; E Fischer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-01

6.  Patients, nurses, and physicians have differing views of quality of critical care.

Authors:  Sarah E Shannon; Pamela H Mitchell; Kevin C Cain
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.176

7.  Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  J A Kruse; M C Thill-Baharozian; R W Carlson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jack E Zimmerman; Andrew A Kramer; Douglas S McNair; Fern M Malila
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  U Ludwigs; J Hulting
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.

Authors:  X Castella; A Artigas; J Bion; A Kari
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electronic hand-drafting and picture management system.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Yang; Cheng-Yuan Ku; David C Yen; Wen-Huai Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Nursing Roles and Strategies in End-of-Life Decision Making in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Judith A Adams; Donald E Bailey; Ruth A Anderson; Sharron L Docherty
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-02

3.  Nurse as a facilitator to professional communication: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian; Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam; Hamid Peyravi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-11-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.