Lucia D Wocial1,2, James E Slaven3, Kianna Montz4, Patrick O Monahan3, Susan E Hickman5,6,4, Christopher M Callahan4,7, Paul R Helft5,8, Greg A Sachs4,7, Lev Inger4, Emily S Burke4, Alexia M Torke5,4,7,9. 1. Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. lwocial@iuhealth.org. 2. Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA. lwocial@iuhealth.org. 3. IU Department of Biostatistics, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 7. IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 8. IU Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 9. Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When working with surrogate decision-makers, physicians often encounter ethical challenges that may cause moral distress which can have negative consequences for physicians. OBJECTIVE: To determine frequency of and factors associated with physicians' moral distress caring for patients requiring a surrogate. DESIGN: Prospective survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians (n = 154) caring for patients aged 65 years and older and their surrogate decision-makers (n = 362 patient/surrogate dyads). Patients were admitted to medicine or medical intensive care services, lacked decisional capacity and had an identified surrogate. MAIN MEASURES: Moral distress thermometer. KEY RESULTS: Physicians experienced moral distress in the care of 152 of 362 patients (42.0%). In analyses adjusted for physician, patient, and surrogate characteristics, physician/surrogate discordance in preferences for the plan of care was not significantly associated with moral distress. Physicians were more likely to experience moral distress when caring for older patients (1.06, 1.02-1.10), and facing a decision about life-sustaining treatment (3.58, 1.54-8.32). Physicians were less likely to experience moral distress when caring for patients residing in a nursing home (0.40, 0.23-0.69), patients who previously discussed care preferences (0.56, 0.35-0.90), and higher surrogate ratings of emotional support from clinicians (0.94, 0.89-0.99). Physicians' internal discordance when they prefer a more comfort-focused plan than the patient is receiving was associated with significantly higher moral distress (2.22, 1.33-3.70) after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Physician moral distress occurs more frequently when the physician is male, the patient is older or requires decisions about life-sustaining treatments. These findings may help target interventions to support physicians. Prior discussions about patient wishes is associated with lower distress and may be a target for patient-centered interventions.
BACKGROUND: When working with surrogate decision-makers, physicians often encounter ethical challenges that may cause moral distress which can have negative consequences for physicians. OBJECTIVE: To determine frequency of and factors associated with physicians' moral distress caring for patients requiring a surrogate. DESIGN: Prospective survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians (n = 154) caring for patients aged 65 years and older and their surrogate decision-makers (n = 362 patient/surrogate dyads). Patients were admitted to medicine or medical intensive care services, lacked decisional capacity and had an identified surrogate. MAIN MEASURES: Moral distress thermometer. KEY RESULTS: Physicians experienced moral distress in the care of 152 of 362 patients (42.0%). In analyses adjusted for physician, patient, and surrogate characteristics, physician/surrogate discordance in preferences for the plan of care was not significantly associated with moral distress. Physicians were more likely to experience moral distress when caring for older patients (1.06, 1.02-1.10), and facing a decision about life-sustaining treatment (3.58, 1.54-8.32). Physicians were less likely to experience moral distress when caring for patients residing in a nursing home (0.40, 0.23-0.69), patients who previously discussed care preferences (0.56, 0.35-0.90), and higher surrogate ratings of emotional support from clinicians (0.94, 0.89-0.99). Physicians' internal discordance when they prefer a more comfort-focused plan than the patient is receiving was associated with significantly higher moral distress (2.22, 1.33-3.70) after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Physician moral distress occurs more frequently when the physician is male, the patient is older or requires decisions about life-sustaining treatments. These findings may help target interventions to support physicians. Prior discussions about patient wishes is associated with lower distress and may be a target for patient-centered interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
geriatric patients; physician moral distress; surrogate decision-making
Authors: Gabriel T Bosslet; Thaddeus M Pope; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Bernard Lo; Robert D Truog; Cynda H Rushton; J Randall Curtis; Dee W Ford; Molly Osborne; Cheryl Misak; David H Au; Elie Azoulay; Baruch Brody; Brenda G Fahy; Jesse B Hall; Jozef Kesecioglu; Alexander A Kon; Kathleen O Lindell; Douglas B White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Patrick Monahan; Christopher M Callahan; Paul R Helft; Greg A Sachs; Lucia D Wocial; James E Slaven; Kianna Montz; Lev Inger; Emily S Burke Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Risto Nikunlaakso; Kirsikka Selander; Elina Weiste; Eveliina Korkiakangas; Maria Paavolainen; Tiina Koivisto; Jaana Laitinen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.614