| Literature DB >> 17204149 |
Joana Duarte1, Prakash Deshpande, Vincent Guiyedi, Salah Mécheri, Constantin Fesel, Pierre-André Cazenave, Gyan C Mishra, Maryvonne Kombila, Sylviane Pied.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increase of serum levels of IgE during Plasmodium falciparum infections in individuals living in endemic areas. These IgEs either protect against malaria or increase malaria pathogenesis. To get an insight into the exact role played by IgE in the outcome of P. falciparum infection, total IgE levels and functional anti-parasite IgE response were studied in children and adults, from two different endemic areas Gabon and India, exhibiting either uncomplicated malaria, severe non cerebral malaria or cerebral malaria, in comparison with control individuals. METHODOLOGY ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17204149 PMCID: PMC1781948 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Characteristics of both studied cohorts: Gabon and India. Clinical group description, according to the number of patients, age, sex and parasitaemia.
| 17 | 2,7 (0,5–5) | 10-7 | - | ||
| 22 | 2,9 (0,1–5) | 12-10 | 0.22 (0.01–1.2) | ||
| 50 | 3 (0,5–5) | 22–28 | 6.88 (0.05–48.6) | ||
| 29 | 1,8 (0,2–4,5) | 18-11 | 5.91 (0.08–31) | ||
| 17 | 2,4 (0,5–5) | 12-5 | 10.42 (0.15–64) | ||
| 145 | 2,6 (0,1–5) | 74-61 | |||
| 9 | 32,7 (25–63) | 8-1 | - | ||
| 14 | 27,3 (23–37) | 13-1 | - | ||
| 31 | 30,8 (4–70) | 18-13 | 1,24 (0,71–2,18) | ||
| 13 | 30,4 (8–65) | 10-3 | 1,11 (0,38–3,21) | ||
| 26 | 40,4 (9–72) | 16-10 | 2,04 (1,07–3,87) | ||
| 5 | 19,36 (7–51) | 0–5 | - | ||
| 93 | 32,3 (4–72) | 65-28 | 1,50 (1,02–2,20) | ||
NEC- non endemic control, EC- endemic control, AI- asymptomatic infected, UM – uncomplicated malaria, SM – severe malaria (non-cerebral), CM – cerebral malaria, ExCM – Ex-cerebral malaria. Note: sex couldn't be determined for 1/18, 11/61 and 4/33 patients from EC, UM and SM, respectively.
Figure 1Distribution of total IgE levels per clinical group in both studied populations: Gabon and India. A. Total IgE levels (μg/ml) per clinical group in Gabonese patients (non-significant Kruskall Wallis test). B. Total IgE levels (μg/ml) in Indian patients (significant Kruskall Wallis test, p = 0.0005). C. Percentage of patients with defined IgE levels per group in the Gabonese population (normal levels (N) lower than or equal to 0.500 μg/ml, moderate levels (N to 2N), from 0.501 to 1.000 μg/ml, high levels (2N to 3N), from 1,000 to 1,500 μg/ml, very high (>3N) greater than 1,500 μg/ml). D. Percentage of patients with defined levels of IgE per group in the Indian population (normal levels (N) lower than or equal to 4,000 μg/ml, moderate levels (N to 2N), from 4,000 to 8,000 μg/ml, high levels (2N to 3N), from 8,000 to 12,000 μg/ml, very high (>3N), greater than 12,000 μg/ml). Legend: EC – endemic control, AI – Asymptomatic infected, UM – uncomplicated malaria, SM – severe malaria, CM – cerebral malaria, NEC – non-endemic control, ExCM – ex-cerebral malaria.
Day 0, day 7 and day 30 median IgE levels per clinical group in the Gabonese population.
| 0,525 (0,009–25,47) | 0,677 (0–41,96) | 0,690 (0,015–13,173) | 1,132 (0,016–9,915) | 0,922 (0,093–16,34) | |
| 0,582 (0,0144–5,644) | 0,448 (0,0192–3,188) | 0,516 (0,011–5,228) | 0,836 (0,016–5,689) | 8,033 (8,033–8,033) | |
| 1,026 (0,044–2,628) | 0,977 (0,056–7,446) | 0,151 (0,052–3,925) | 0,662 (0,011–6,315) | ------ |
EC – endemic control, AI – asymptomatic infected, UM – uncomplicated malaria, SM – severe malaria (non-cerebral), CM – cerebral malaria.
Figure 2A. Total IgE correlation with age in the Gabonese population (significant spearman correlation, p = 1.0 × 10-9). B. Total IgE correlation with parasitaemia in the Indian population. Significant Spearman correlation (p = 0,0001).
Figure 3Percentage of patients with positive functional IgE against parasite antigen in the Gabonese and Indian populations. A. Distribution of patients with positive anti-parasite functional IgE, exhibiting different intensities of enzyme release per clinical group in the Gabonese population (low enzyme release, from 5 to 10%; moderate enzyme release, from 10 to 30%; and high enzyme release, greater than than 30%). B. Distribution of patients with positive anti-parasite functional IgE in the Indian population.
Cytokine distribution in the Gabonese population: median TNF, IFN-γ and IL-10 levels per clinical group.
| 41 (8–94) | 36 (0–395) | 8 (0–440) | 175 (1–442) | 209 (0–1520) | |
| 3,2 (0–8) | 9,5 (0–31) | 5 (0–395) | 4 (0–201) | 6,2 (2,5–9) | |
| 14 (0–83) | 102 (0–317) | 134 (0–1380) | 339 (0–5200) | 95 (0–2300) |
EC – endemic control, AI – asymptomatic infected, UM – uncomplicated malaria, SM – severe malaria (non-cerebral), CM – cerebral malaria.
Comparing group by group with the Endemic control: TNF was significantly lower in UM (p = 0,0006); IFN-γ was significantly higher in AI and CM (p = 0,02 and p = 0,007, respectively); IL-10 was significantly higher in UM (p = 0,0009), SM (p = 0,0001) and CM (p = 0,0001)
Figure 4IL-10 correlation with total IgE levels in the Gabonese population. Dashed line - Asymptomatic patients (significant negative spearman correlation, p = 0.025). Bold line - Uncomplicated malaria patients (significant positive correlation, p = 0.017).
Cytokine distribution in the Indian population: median TNF, IFN-γ and IL-10 per clinical group.
| ExCM | ||||||
| 57 (39–73) | 78 (63–120) | 180 (119–207) | 200 (173–381) | 530 (258–1227) | 81 (69–124) | |
| 23 (10–31) | 22 (17–201) | 119 (70–153) | 127 (111–200) | 65 (45–101) | 32 (11–53) | |
| 13 (5–26) | 22 (11–31) | 120 (97–147) | 176 (121–253) | 301 (175–506) | 85 (40–108) | |
| 18 (8–40) | 58 (23–84) | 65 (31–204) | 69 (50–89) | 62 (40–85) | 48 (29–80) |
NEC – non endemic control, EC – endemic control, UM – uncomplicated malaria, SM – severe malaria (non-cerebral), CM – cerebral malaria, ExCM – Ex-cerebral malaria.
Comparing group by group with the Endemic control: TNF was significantly lower in NEC (p = 0,0006) and higher in UM (p = 1,19 × 10-7), SM (p = 1,01 × 10-5) and CM (p = 2,26 × 10-7); IFN-γ was significantly higher in all diseased groups (UM – p = 5,11 × 10-6, SM – p = 1,01 × 10-6, CM – p = 9,71 × 10-6); IL-10 was significantly higher in all diseased groups (UM – p = 1,04 × 10-7, SM – p = 1,01 × 10-5 and CM – p = 2,46 × 10-7).
Figure 5Cytokine correlation with IgE levels in the Indian population. A. TNF correlation with total IgE levels (significant positive spearman correlation, p = 0.0037); B. IFN-γ correlation with total IgE levels (Significant positive spearman correlation, p = 0.0028); C. IL-10 correlation with total IgE levels (significant positive spearman correlation, p = 0.0051).