Literature DB >> 17201551

Conflict and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Tim Curran1, Casey DeBuse1, P Andrew Leynes2.   

Abstract

Recognition memory requires both retrieval processes and control processes such as criterion setting. Decision criteria were manipulated by offering different payoffs for correct "old" versus "new" responses. Criterion setting influenced the following late-occurring (1,000+ ms), conflict-sensitive event-related brain potential (ERP) components: the stimulus-locked late posterior negativity (LPN) and the response-locked error-related negativity (ERN). The LPN-ERN were most negative to hits under conservative payoff conditions involving conflict between the correct old response and the payoff for new responses. This same conservative-hit condition was most frequently associated with response reversals when fast initial judgments were followed by slower judgments. Postresponse ERP activity may index conflict-sensitive processes underlying postretrieval cognitive control mechanisms involved with assessing responses to current items and updating response criteria on later trials. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17201551     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces.

Authors:  Tim Curran; Jane Hancock
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: evidence for adaptive criterion learning.

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

4.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

5.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

6.  Mere exposure effect(s) in the context of explicit memory search.

Authors:  David Grybinas; Justin Kantner; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

7.  Revising recognition judgments during noisy recognition evidence accumulation: The dynamics of losses versus gains.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

8.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Mikael Johansson; Michael Weigl; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of high-level perception during spatial navigation.

Authors:  Christoph T Weidemann; Matthew V Mollison; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.