Literature DB >> 10600076

How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?

J E Frencken1, C J Holmgren.   

Abstract

The ART approach involves excavating cavitated dentine caries with hand instruments, then restoring the cavity and sealing any associated fissures and pits with an adhesive restorative material, resulting in a sealant restoration. Until recently, ART has mainly been used under field conditions, and thus the adhesive restorative material used has been glass ionomer which does not require mixing machines and curing lights. Since the inception of ART, a growing number of studies world-wide have taken place. A total of four studies have reported 3-year survival percentages for one-surface ART restorations. The highest 3-year survival percentage in permanent teeth was 88%, which is comparable to the 85% survival of one-surface amalgam restorations placed under the same field conditions after 3 years. The outcomes depend to some extent on the material used, operator experience and presence of caries. The presence of caries as a reason for failure was higher in the early than in the most recent studies. Only one study has reported on the use of ART restorations in the deciduous dentition. It is concluded that: a very large proportion of dentine lesions in the permanent teeth can be treated using the ART approach; the 3-year survival rate of the more recently placed one-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth was higher than that of ART restorations placed in the beginning; the survival of one-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition with newer glass ionomers is comparable to that of one-surface conventional restorations placed using amalgam in a comparable setting after 3 years; more studies of longer duration are needed to confirm these findings; ART should be considered a caries treatment modality that benefits people; and educational courses need to be organised before the approach is applied in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10600076     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  18 in total

1.  In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  R C Silva; A C C Zuanon; R R Esberard; M S M Candido; J S Machado
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment.

Authors:  Renata Cristiane da Silva; Angela Cristina Cilense Zuanon; Denise Madalena Palomari Spolidorio; Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Partial caries removal increases the survival of permanent tooth: a 14-year case report.

Authors:  J C P Imparato; K M S Moreira; I C Olegário; S R E P da Silva; D P Raggio
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2017-10-30

4.  Effect of antibacterial agents on the surface hardness of a conventional glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Tamer Tüzüner; Tezer Ulusu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Amend; C Boutsiouki; K Bekes; D Kloukos; N N Lygidakis; R Frankenberger; N Krämer
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-07-12

6.  Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.

Authors:  I M Schüler; B Monse; C J Holmgren; T Lehmann; G S Itchon; R Heinrich-Weltzien
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Microbiological evaluation of salivary Streptococcus mutans from children of age 5-7 years, pre- and post-atraumatic restorative treatment.

Authors:  N M Roshan; Anand L Shigli; Shobha D Deshpande
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2010-04

Review 8.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Maria José Martinez-Zapata; Tanya Walsh; Valeria Cc Marinho; Aubrey Sheiham Deceased; Carlos Zaror
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-28

9.  Survival Rate and Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Restorations among Anganwadi Preschool Children in Bengaluru City: A Follow-up Study.

Authors:  K B Shilpashree; V Chaithra; Archana Bhat; Archana Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2021-05-29

10.  A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.

Authors:  Clarissa-Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Marcelo Bönecker; Cor Van Loveren; W Evert Van Amerongen; Daniela-Prócida Raggio
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.