Literature DB >> 17196153

Spatially mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception.

Jason S McCarley1, Jeffrey R W Mounts, Arthur F Kramer.   

Abstract

Modern theories conceptualize visual selective attention as a competition between objects for the control of cortical receptive fields (RFs). Implicit in this framework is the suggestion that spatially proximal objects, which draw from overlapping pools of RFs, should be more difficult to represent in parallel and with excess capacity than spatially separated objects. The present experiments tested this prediction using analysis of response time distributions in a redundant-targets letter identification task. Data revealed that excess-capacity parallel processing is possible when redundant targets are widely separated within the visual field, but that capacity is near fixed when targets are adjacent. Even at the largest separations tested, however, processing capacity remained strongly limited.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196153     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  10 in total

1.  Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing.

Authors:  Kelly S Steelman-Allen; Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Faster than the speed of rejection: Object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Stephen C Walenchok; Joseph W Houpt; Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Functional principal components analysis of workload capacity functions.

Authors:  Devin M Burns; Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend; Michael J Endres
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-12

5.  When emotion blinds: a spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Briana L Kennedy; Steven B Most
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-07

6.  Event-related potentials dissociate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation.

Authors:  Matthew R Hilimire; Jeffrey R W Mounts; Nathan A Parks; Paul M Corballis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Context and competition in the capture of visual attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load.

Authors:  Stephanie A Morey; Nicole A Thomas; Jason S McCarley
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-02-21

9.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10

10.  Representing where along with what information in a model of a cortical patch.

Authors:  Yasser Roudi; Alessandro Treves
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.