Literature DB >> 17192450

Routine versus selective abdominal computed tomography scan in the evaluation of right lower quadrant pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Christopher C Lee1, Robert Golub, Adam J Singer, Roberto Cantu, Howard Levinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. The authors hypothesized that selective use of abdominal CT would reduce imaging without increasing the rates of negative appendectomy and perforated appendicitis.
METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in a community teaching emergency department. Adult patients with acute RLQ abdominal pain with suspected acute appendicitis were included. Patients were randomized to mandatory (all patients) or selective (based on clinical evaluation) abdominal CT imaging. The primary outcome was the negative appendectomy rate.
RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were randomized to selective (n = 80) and mandatory (n = 72) intervention groups. The mean (+/-SD) age was 34.1 (+/-3.5) years, and 48% were female. CT imaging was performed in 54 of 80 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 56% to 78%) in the selective group and in 70 of 72 patients (97%; 95% CI = 90% to 100%) in the mandatory group. There was a trend to a decreased rate of negative appendectomy in the mandatory group (1/39 [2.6%]; 95% CI = 0.5% to 13.2%) as compared with the selective group (6/43 [13.9%]; 95% CI = 6.6% to 27.3%), with a difference in prevalence rates of 11.3% (95% CI = -3.5% to 26.3%). There was also a trend to a decreased perforated appendix rate in the mandatory group (4/39 [10.3%]) as compared with the selective group (7/38 [18.4%]), with a difference in prevalence rates of 8.2% (95% CI = -8.0% to 24.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small sample of adult patients with RLQ abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis, CT imaging was performed less frequently in the selective group and there was a trend with mandatory CT imaging to reduced rates of negative appendectomy and perforated appendices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17192450     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Shinya Sakai; Kuriko Kobayashi; Shin-ichi Toyabe; Nozomu Mandai; Tatsuo Kanda; Kohei Akazawa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Reply to letter: "Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis".

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  N D'Souza; M Marsden; S Bottomley; N Nagarajah; F Scutt; S Toh
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The Alvarado score versus computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A prospective study.

Authors:  Ashraf F Al-Faouri; Khaled Y Ajarma; Abdulhamid M Al-Abbadi; Abdullah H Al-Omari; Tariq S Almunaizel; Alaa A Alzu'bi; Ra'ed Y Al-Jarrah; Omar Y Abo-Zaiton
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 5.  Use of advanced imaging techniques during visits to emergency departments--implications, costs, patient benefits/risks.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Dick; Dinesh Varma; Elika Kashef; John Curtis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Krajewski; Jacqueline Brown; P Terry Phang; Manoj Raval; Carl J Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Optimizing imaging in suspected appendicitis (OPTIMAP-study): a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Study Protocol.

Authors:  Marjolein M N Leeuwenburgh; Wytze Laméris; Adrienne van Randen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Marja A Boermeester; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-20

Review 8.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

9.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Rafael Alfonso; Puneet Bhargava; Carlos Cuevas; Manjiri K Dighe; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.