BACKGROUND: To assess and compare performance of the Alvarado score and computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Hussein Medical Center. METHODS: A total of 320 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were included in this study over a period of 2 years. The Alvarado score was calculated for all of these patients and 112 CT scans were requested selectively by surgeons caring for the patients. The histopathology diagnosis was used as the gold standard against which diagnostic performance of Alvarado score and CT scan were compared. RESULTS: The complete data of 196 males and 124 females were analyzed at the end of the study period. The mean age was 26.1 ± 11.3 years. Appendectomy was performed in 263 patients with a negative appendectomy rate of 14.83% overall (12.28 in males and 19.56 in females). The remaining 57 patients were assumed to have no appendicitis. The diagnostic performance of CT scan was superior to that of Alvarado score with sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 94.2 versus 85.4%, 90 versus 65%, 9.42 versus 2.44, and 0.065 versus 0.224, respectively (p-value < 0.05). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scan was 92.6% compared to 77.5% for Alvarado score. CONCLUSION: The Alvarado score was far from good and CT scan is more accurate in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our patient population.
BACKGROUND: To assess and compare performance of the Alvarado score and computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Hussein Medical Center. METHODS: A total of 320 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were included in this study over a period of 2 years. The Alvarado score was calculated for all of these patients and 112 CT scans were requested selectively by surgeons caring for the patients. The histopathology diagnosis was used as the gold standard against which diagnostic performance of Alvarado score and CT scan were compared. RESULTS: The complete data of 196 males and 124 females were analyzed at the end of the study period. The mean age was 26.1 ± 11.3 years. Appendectomy was performed in 263 patients with a negative appendectomy rate of 14.83% overall (12.28 in males and 19.56 in females). The remaining 57 patients were assumed to have no appendicitis. The diagnostic performance of CT scan was superior to that of Alvarado score with sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 94.2 versus 85.4%, 90 versus 65%, 9.42 versus 2.44, and 0.065 versus 0.224, respectively (p-value < 0.05). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT scan was 92.6% compared to 77.5% for Alvarado score. CONCLUSION: The Alvarado score was far from good and CT scan is more accurate in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our patient population.
Authors: C F Chong; A Thien; A J Mackie; A S Tin; S Tripathi; M A Ahmad; L T Tan; S H Ang; P U Telisinghe Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: C F Chong; M I W Adi; A Thien; A Suyoi; A J Mackie; A S Tin; S Tripathi; N H Jaman; K K Tan; K Y Kok; V V Mathew; O Paw; H B Chua; S K Yapp Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Victor Y Kong; Stefan van der Linde; Colleen Aldous; Jonathan J Handley; Damian L Clarke Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Bimbadhar Valluru; Zhou Zhou; Dineswar Sah; Wei Du; Mahamed O Ali; Ahmed A Adam; Liang Zhang; Juan J Wang Journal: Jpn J Radiol Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 2.374