Literature DB >> 17189325

Arabidopsis transcriptome changes in response to phloem-feeding silverleaf whitefly nymphs. Similarities and distinctions in responses to aphids.

Louisa A Kempema1, Xinping Cui, Frances M Holzer, Linda L Walling.   

Abstract

Phloem-feeding pests cause extensive crop damage throughout the world, yet little is understood about how plants perceive and defend themselves from these threats. The silverleaf whitefly (SLWF; Bemisia tabaci type B) is a good model for studying phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions, as SLWF nymphs cause little wounding and have a long, continuous interaction with the plant. Using the Affymetrix ATH1 GeneChip to monitor the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) transcriptome, 700 transcripts were found to be up-regulated and 556 down-regulated by SLWF nymphs. Closer examination of the regulation of secondary metabolite (glucosinolate) and defense pathway genes after SLWF-instar feeding shows that responses were qualitatively and quantitatively different from chewing insects and aphids. In addition to the RNA profile distinctions, analysis of SLWF performance on wild-type and phytoalexin-deficient4 (pad4) mutants suggests aphid and SLWF interactions with Arabidopsis were distinct. While pad4-1 mutants were more susceptible to aphids, SLWF development on pad4-1 and wild-type plants was similar. Furthermore, although jasmonic acid genes were repressed and salicylic acid-regulated genes were induced after SLWF feeding, cytological staining of SLWF-infested tissue showed that pathogen defenses, such as localized cell death and hydrogen peroxide accumulation, were not observed. Like aphid and fungal pathogens, callose synthase gene RNAs accumulated and callose deposition was observed in SLWF-infested tissue. These results provide a more comprehensive understanding of phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions and distinguish SLWF global responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17189325      PMCID: PMC1803730          DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.090662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  64 in total

Review 1.  Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression.

Authors:  P Reymond; E E Farmer
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 2.  Genes controlling expression of defense responses in Arabidopsis--2001 status.

Authors:  J Glazebrook
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 3.  Volatile signaling in plant-plant-herbivore interactions: what is real?

Authors:  Ian T Baldwin; André Kessler; Rayko Halitschke
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Gene-for-gene defense of wheat against the Hessian fly lacks a classical oxidative burst.

Authors:  Marcelo P Giovanini; David P Puthoff; Jill A Nemacheck; Omprakash Mittapalli; Kurt D Saltzmann; Herbert W Ohm; Richard H Shukle; Christie E Williams
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  The outcomes of concentration-specific interactions between salicylate and jasmonate signaling include synergy, antagonism, and oxidative stress leading to cell death.

Authors:  Luis A J Mur; Paul Kenton; Rainer Atzorn; Otto Miersch; Claus Wasternack
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Identification of expression profiles of sorghum genes in response to greenbug phloem-feeding using cDNA subtraction and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Park; Yinghua Huang; Patricia Ayoubi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics.

Authors:  Masami Yokota Hirai; Marion Klein; Yuuta Fujikawa; Mitsuru Yano; Dayan B Goodenowe; Yasuyo Yamazaki; Shigehiko Kanaya; Yukiko Nakamura; Masahiko Kitayama; Hideyuki Suzuki; Nozomu Sakurai; Daisuke Shibata; Jim Tokuhisa; Michael Reichelt; Jonathan Gershenzon; Jutta Papenbrock; Kazuki Saito
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack.

Authors:  Martin De Vos; Vivian R Van Oosten; Remco M P Van Poecke; Johan A Van Pelt; Maria J Pozo; Martin J Mueller; Antony J Buchala; Jean-Pierre Métraux; L C Van Loon; Marcel Dicke; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Curtis G Wilkerson; Jason A Kuchar; Brett S Phinney; Gregg A Howe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Transcriptional regulation of sorghum defense determinants against a phloem-feeding aphid.

Authors:  Keyan Zhu-Salzman; Ron A Salzman; Ji-Eun Ahn; Hisashi Koiwa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  109 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana-Aphid Interaction.

Authors:  Joe Louis; Vijay Singh; Jyoti Shah
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Glucosinolate breakdown in Arabidopsis: mechanism, regulation and biological significance.

Authors:  Ute Wittstock; Meike Burow
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2010-07-12

Review 3.  Plant transcriptomics and responses to environmental stress: an overview.

Authors:  Sameen Ruqia Imadi; Alvina Gul Kazi; Mohammad Abass Ahanger; Salih Gucel; Parvaiz Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  Nice to meet you: genetic, epigenetic and metabolic controls of plant perception of beneficial associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in non-leguminous plants.

Authors:  T L G Carvalho; H G F Ballesteros; F Thiebaut; P C G Ferreira; A S Hemerly
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Reciprocal responses in the interaction between Arabidopsis and the cell-content-feeding chelicerate herbivore spider mite.

Authors:  Vladimir Zhurov; Marie Navarro; Kristie A Bruinsma; Vicent Arbona; M Estrella Santamaria; Marc Cazaux; Nicky Wybouw; Edward J Osborne; Cherise Ens; Cristina Rioja; Vanessa Vermeirssen; Ignacio Rubio-Somoza; Priti Krishna; Isabel Diaz; Markus Schmid; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Yves Van de Peer; Miodrag Grbic; Richard M Clark; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Vojislava Grbic
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Elicitation of jasmonate-mediated host defense in Brassica juncea (L.) attenuates population growth of mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.).

Authors:  Murali Krishna Koramutla; Amandeep Kaur; Manisha Negi; Perumal Venkatachalam; Ramcharan Bhattacharya
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 7.  Plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ozone (O3) polluted atmospheres: the ecological effects.

Authors:  Delia M Pinto; James D Blande; Silvia R Souza; Anne-Marja Nerg; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Whiteflies interfere with indirect plant defense against spider mites in Lima bean.

Authors:  Peng-Jun Zhang; Si-Jun Zheng; Joop J A van Loon; Wilhelm Boland; Anja David; Roland Mumm; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A developmentally regulated lipocalin-like gene is overexpressed in Tomato yellow leaf curl virus-resistant tomato plants upon virus inoculation, and its silencing abolishes resistance.

Authors:  Dagan Sade; Assaf Eybishtz; Rena Gorovits; Iris Sobol; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Cotton photosynthesis-related PSAK1 protein is involved in plant response to aphid attack.

Authors:  Jian-Min Zhang; Geng-Qing Huang; Yang Li; Yong Zheng; Xue-Bao Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.