Literature DB >> 16167763

Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack.

Martin De Vos1, Vivian R Van Oosten, Remco M P Van Poecke, Johan A Van Pelt, Maria J Pozo, Martin J Mueller, Antony J Buchala, Jean-Pierre Métraux, L C Van Loon, Marcel Dicke, Corné M J Pieterse.   

Abstract

Plant defenses against pathogens and insects are regulated differentially by cross-communicating signaling pathways in which salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) play key roles. To understand how plants integrate pathogen- and insect-induced signals into specific defense responses, we monitored the dynamics of SA, JA, and ET signaling in Arabidopsis after attack by a set of microbial pathogens and herbivorous insects with different modes of attack. Arabidopsis plants were exposed to a pathogenic leaf bacterium (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato), a pathogenic leaf fungus (Alternaria brassicicola), tissue-chewing caterpillars (Pieris rapae), cell-content-feeding thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), or phloem-feeding aphids (Myzus persicae). Monitoring the signal signature in each plant-attacker combination showed that the kinetics of SA, JA, and ET production varies greatly in both quantity and timing. Analysis of global gene expression profiles demonstrated that the signal signature characteristic of each Arabidopsis-attacker combination is orchestrated into a surprisingly complex set of transcriptional alterations in which, in all cases, stress-related genes are overrepresented. Comparison of the transcript profiles revealed that consistent changes induced by pathogens and insects with very different modes of attack can show considerable overlap. Of all consistent changes induced by A. brassicicola, Pieris rapae, and E occidentalis, more than 50% also were induced consistently by P. syringae. Notably, although these four attackers all stimulated JA biosynthesis, the majority of the changes in JA-responsive gene expression were attacker specific. All together, our study shows that SA, JA, and ET play a primary role in the orchestration of the plant's defense response, but other regulatory mechanisms, such as pathway cross-talk or additional attacker-induced signals, eventually shape the highly complex attacker-specific defense response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16167763     DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact        ISSN: 0894-0282            Impact factor:   4.171


  305 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana-Aphid Interaction.

Authors:  Joe Louis; Vijay Singh; Jyoti Shah
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Arabidopsis-insect interactions.

Authors:  Remco M P Van Poecke
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2007-02-21

Review 3.  Xenohormesis: health benefits from an eon of plant stress response evolution.

Authors:  Philip L Hooper; Paul L Hooper; Michael Tytell; Lászlo Vígh
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Plant immunity: it's the hormones talking, but what do they say?

Authors:  Adriaan Verhage; Saskia C M van Wees; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Glucosinolate breakdown in Arabidopsis: mechanism, regulation and biological significance.

Authors:  Ute Wittstock; Meike Burow
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2010-07-12

6.  Ethylene modulates the role of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 in cross talk between salicylate and jasmonate signaling.

Authors:  Antonio Leon-Reyes; Steven H Spoel; Elvira S De Lange; Hiroshi Abe; Masatomo Kobayashi; Shinya Tsuda; Frank F Millenaar; Rob A M Welschen; Tita Ritsema; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Regulation of tradeoffs between plant defenses against pathogens with different lifestyles.

Authors:  Steven H Spoel; Jessica S Johnson; Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Pathogen-triggered ethylene signaling mediates systemic-induced susceptibility to herbivory in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman; Adam K Bahrami; Amity M Wilczek; Jianping Cui; Jacob A Russell; Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo; Ian A Butler; Jignasha D Rana; Guo-Hua Huang; Jenifer Bush; Frederick M Ausubel; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Reciprocal responses in the interaction between Arabidopsis and the cell-content-feeding chelicerate herbivore spider mite.

Authors:  Vladimir Zhurov; Marie Navarro; Kristie A Bruinsma; Vicent Arbona; M Estrella Santamaria; Marc Cazaux; Nicky Wybouw; Edward J Osborne; Cherise Ens; Cristina Rioja; Vanessa Vermeirssen; Ignacio Rubio-Somoza; Priti Krishna; Isabel Diaz; Markus Schmid; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Yves Van de Peer; Miodrag Grbic; Richard M Clark; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Vojislava Grbic
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Central Metabolic Responses to Ozone and Herbivory Affect Photosynthesis and Stomatal Closure.

Authors:  Stefano Papazian; Eliezer Khaling; Christelle Bonnet; Steve Lassueur; Philippe Reymond; Thomas Moritz; James D Blande; Benedicte R Albrectsen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.