Literature DB >> 24656555

Randomized clinical trial of self versus clinical administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Anitra Beasley1, Katharine O'Connell White2, Serge Cremers3, Carolyn Westhoff4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility, acceptability, continuation, and trough serum levels following self-administration of subcutaneous (sc) depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). STUDY
DESIGN: Women presenting to a family planning clinic to initiate, restart or continue DMPA were offered study entry. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to self- or clinician administered sc DMPA 104 mg. Those randomized to self-administration were taught to self-inject and were supervised in performing the initial injection; they received printed instructions and a supply of contraceptive injections for home use. Participants randomized to clinician administration received usual care. Continued DMPA use was assessed by self-report and trough medroxyprogesterone acetate levels at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty women were invited to participate, and 137 (55%) enrolled. Of these, 91 were allocated to self-administration, and 90/91 were able to correctly self-administer sc DMPA. Eighty-seven percent completed follow-up. DMPA use at 1 year was 71% for the self-administration group and 63% for the clinic group (p=0.47). Uninterrupted DMPA use was 47% and 48% for the self and clinic administration groups at 1 year (p=0.70), respectively. Serum analyses confirmed similar mean DMPA levels in both groups and therapeutic trough levels in all participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-three percent of women approached were interested in trying self-administration of DMPA, even in the context of a randomized trial, and nearly all eligible for enrollment were successful at doing so. Self-administration and clinic administration resulted in similar continuation rates and similar DMPA serum levels. Self-administration of sc DMPA is feasible and may be an attractive alternative for many women. IMPLICATIONS: Self-administration of sc DMPA is a feasible and attractive option for many women. Benefits include increased control over contraceptive measures and less time spent on contracepting behaviors. Globally, self-administration has the potential to revolutionize contraceptive uptake by increasing the number of women with access to DMPA.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; Injectable; Self-administration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656555      PMCID: PMC4086940          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Sujatha Prabhakaran; Ashley Sweet
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Pilot study of home self-administration of subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.

Authors:  Sharon T Cameron; Anna Glasier; Anne Johnstone
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Vaughn I Rickert; Lorraine Tiezzi; Judy Lipshutz; Jacquelyn León; Roger D Vaughan; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Self-injection of monthly combined hormonal contraceptive.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Kara Eastwood; Alison Carletta
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  The acceptability of self-administration of subcutaneous Depo-Provera.

Authors:  Fatim Lakha; Charlotte Henderson; Anna Glasier
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; Kelly Cleland; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate by adolescent women.

Authors:  Rebekah L Williams; Devon J Hensel; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Pharmacist-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carla Picardo; Stefanie Ferreri
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Improving contraceptive use in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Jacqueline E Darroch; Lisa Remez
Journal:  Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst)       Date:  2008

10.  Self pregnancy testing in an urban family planning clinic: promising results for a new approach to contraceptive follow-up.

Authors:  Christopher M Estes; Jahanett Ramirez; Jahanett Ramierez; Lorraine Tiezzi; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Hormonal Contraception and HIV-1 Acquisition: Biological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Janet P Hapgood; Charu Kaushic; Zdenek Hel
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Mary Lyn Gaffield; Martha Brady; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Is a lower-dose, subcutaneous contraceptive injectable containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate likely to impact women's risk of HIV?

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Sharon L Achilles; Zdenek Hel; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  A prospective cohort study of the feasibility and acceptability of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate administered subcutaneously through self-injection.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Allen Namagembe; Justine Tumusiime; Jeanette Lim; Jennifer Kidwell Drake; Anthony K Mbonye
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Trends in subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) use in Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda.

Authors:  Philip Anglewicz; Pierre Akilimali; Georges Guiella; Patrick Kayembe; Simon P S Kibira; Fredrick Makumbi; Amy Tsui; Scott Radloff
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019-11-09

6.  Continuation of injectable contraception when self-injected vs. administered by a facility-based health worker: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study in Uganda.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Allen Namagembe; Justine Tumusiime; Damalie Nsangi; Jeanette Lim; Dinah Nakiganda-Busiku
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Continuation of self-injected versus provider-administered contraception in Senegal: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Maymouna Ba; Jennifer Kidwell Drake; Marėme Dia NDiaye
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Assessment of Self-Administration of Romiplostim in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura after Receipt of Home Administration Training Materials: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Martin Schipperus; Georgia Kaiafa; Louise Taylor; Sally Wetten; Georg Kreuzbauer; Andy Boshier; Anouchka Seesaghur
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Cost-effectiveness of self-injected DMPA-SC compared with health-worker-injected DMPA-IM in Senegal.

Authors:  Mercy Mvundura; Laura Di Giorgio; Chloe Morozoff; Jane Cover; Marguerite Ndour; Jennifer Kidwell Drake
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019

Review 10.  Self-administration of injectable contraceptives: a systematic review.

Authors:  C R Kim; M S Fønhus; B Ganatra
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.