Literature DB >> 17180287

Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms.

R A Pierce1, J A Spitler, W G Hawkins, S M Strasberg, D C Linehan, V J Halpin, J C Eagon, L M Brunt, M M Frisella, B D Matthews.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experience with laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms remains limited. The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the indications for and outcomes after laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms from July 2000 to February 2006 were reviewed. Data are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 22 patients (M:F, 8:14) with a mean age of 56.3 +/- 15.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.3 +/- 4.5 kg/m2. Nine patients had undergone previous intra-abdominal surgery. Indications for pancreatic resection were cyst (1), glucagonoma (1), gastrinoma (2), insulinoma (3), metastatic tumor (2), IPMT (4), nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor (3), and mucinous/serous cystadenoma (6). Mean tumor size was 2.4 +/- 1.6 cm. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was attempted in 18 patients and completed in 17, and enucleation was performed in 4 patients. Laparoscopic ultrasound (n = 10) and a hand-assisted technique (n = 4) were utilized selectively. Mean operative time was 236 +/- 60 min and mean blood loss was 244 +/- 516 ml. There was one conversion to an open procedure because of bleeding from the splenic vein. The mean postoperative LOS was 4.5 +/- 2.0 days. Seven patients experienced a total of ten postoperative complications, including a urinary tract infection (UTI) (1), lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (1), infected peripancreatic fluid collection (1), pancreatic pseudocyst (1), and pancreatic fistula (6). Five pancreatic fistulas were managed by percutaneous drainage. The reoperation rate was 4.5% and the overall pancreatic-related complication rate was 36.4%. One patient developed pancreatitis and a pseudocyst 5 months postoperatively, which was managed successfully with a pancreatic duct stent. There was no 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is safe and feasible in selected patients with pancreatic neoplasms. With a pancreatic duct leak rate of 27%, this problem remains an area of development for the minimally invasive technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180287     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9022-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  31 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  H P Knaebel; M K Diener; M N Wente; M W Büchler; C M Seiler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases.

Authors:  Y Kajiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; K Tsutsumi; Y Kinoshita; H Akiyama
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The role of staging laparoscopy in hepatobiliary malignancy: prospective analysis of 401 cases.

Authors:  M D'Angelica; Y Fong; S Weber; M Gonen; R P DeMatteo; K Conlon; L H Blumgart; W R Jarnagin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

7.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: current indications and surgical results.

Authors:  S Shimizu; M Tanaka; H Konomi; K Mizumoto; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic infracolic approach for complications of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S A Cuschieri; J J Jakimowicz; G Stultiens
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  1998-09
View more
  33 in total

1.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Video. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for splenic artery aneurysm.

Authors:  Brandon T Grover; Sigurd B Gundersen; Shanu N Kothari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  B W Eom; J-Y Jang; S E Lee; H-S Han; Y-S Yoon; S-W Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Christopher D Briggs; Christopher D Mann; Glen R B Irving; Christopher P Neal; Mark Peterson; Iain C Cameron; David P Berry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Successful interventional radiological management of postoperative complications of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Zhu; Jun-Jun Ni; Ren-Biao Chen; Erik Matro; Xiao-Wu Xu; Bin Li; Hong-Jie Hu; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Ramsey; Robert C Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects.

Authors:  Omer S Al-Taan; James A Stephenson; Christopher Briggs; Cristina Pollard; Matthew S Metcalfe; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Occult sporadic insulinoma: localization and surgical strategy.

Authors:  Bassam Abboud; Joe Boujaoude
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  [Distal pancreatectomy: radical or spleen-preserving?].

Authors:  A M Chromik; M Janot; D Sülberg; M H Seelig; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation: an operation without increased morbidity.

Authors:  Peter Nau; W Scott Melvin; Vimal K Narula; P Mark Bloomston; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.