Literature DB >> 15646908

The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset.

A M Palm1, U Kirkegaard, S Poulsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the perception of pain and time of onset in relation to mandibular alveolar nerve block administered by a computerized anesthesia delivery system (ie, The Wand) and a traditional anesthesia system (ie, the syringe).
METHODS: This study was conducted according to a split-mouth design, with both types of injections being given to all patients. Subjects consisted of 33 patients between 7 and 18 years of age requiring local anesthesia for dental restorations in both sides of the mandible. All patients were blindfolded, and the sound from the Wand machine was activated during both types of administration. Topical analgesic was placed in the area of the injection site in all cases. Pain ratings were obtained using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Time of onset was measured, from withdrawal of the needle to numbness of the lower lip was reported.
RESULTS: The computerized anesthesia delivery system resulted in significantly lower pain ratings than the traditional syringe. No difference could be found in time of onset between the 2 methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular alveolar block analgesia seems to be less painful when using The Wand than when using a traditional syringe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15646908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  18 in total

1.  The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Geoffrey Steinkruger; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

2.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

3.  The influence of distinct techniques of local dental anesthesia in 9- to 12-year-old children: randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Priscila de Camargo Smolarek; Leonardo Siqueira da Silva; Paula Regina Dias Martins; Karen da Cruz Hartman; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  "Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial".

Authors:  S Berrendero; O Hriptulova; M P Salido; F Martínez-Rus; G Pradíes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Pain and efficacy rating of a microprocessor-controlled metered injection system for local anaesthesia in minor hand surgery.

Authors:  André S Nimigan; Bing Siang Gan
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-25

7.  Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment.

Authors:  Joana Monteiro; Ajit Tanday; Paul F Ashley; Susan Parekh; Hamdan Alamri
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

8.  Success rate of IR midazolam sedation in combination with C-CLAD in pediatric dental patients-a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Malka Ashkenazi; Anat Baniel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Articaine (4%) with epinephrine (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in inferior alveolar nerve block: Effects on the vital signs and onset, and duration of anesthesia.

Authors:  Esshagh Lasemi; Mehdi Sezavar; Leyla Habibi; Seyfollah Hemmat; Farzin Sarkarat; Zahra Nematollahi
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Cartridge syringe vs computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system: Pain related behaviour over two sequential visits - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yogesh-Kumar Thoppe-Dhamodhara; Sharath Asokan; Baby-John John; GeethaPriya Pollachi-Ramakrishnan; Punithavathy Ramachandran; Praburajan Vilvanathan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.