Literature DB >> 17172962

An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.

Jack Piermatti1, Hoda Yousef, Allyn Luke, Richard Mahevich, Saul Weiner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine, in a controlled environment, effects of connection design upon screw stability. Implant fixtures have 2 types of connections to the abutment: internal connection and external hex. Four implant systems were tested: Bio-Lok (external hex; Bio-Lok International, Inc., Deerfield Beach, FL); Zimmer (internal connection; Zimmer Dental, Carlsbad, CA); Nobel Biocare (external hex; Nobel Biocare USA, Inc., Yorba Linda, CA); and Astra Tech (internal connection; Astra Tech Inc., Waltham, MA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten samples of each system, including base, implant, abutment, and molar crown, were loaded to 200 N for 1 x 10(6) cycles. Screws were tightened to manufacturers' recommendations,and torque audits done at 2.5 x 10(5), 5 x 10(5), 7.5 x 10(5), and 1 x 10(6) cycles.
RESULTS: The Bio-Lok samples lost an average of 10% of the original torque values, the Astra Tech group lost almost all of the torque and loosened, while the Zimmer and Nobel Biocare samples lost an average of 50% of the torque but did not loosen (P <or= 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded from this study that although internal connections are clinically favored, this study did not show any advantage relative to screw loosening. However, screw design may be a significant factor in loosening of the joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17172962     DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000245440.09464.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  8 in total

1.  In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Marta Relvas; Ana Cristina Braga; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Javier Gil; José Vicente Rios-Santos; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.

Authors:  Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Maria Luiza Cabral Maia; Susanne S Scherrer; Antonio Carlos Cardoso; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 3.  Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Javier Montero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 4.  Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.

Authors:  S Nithyapriya; A S Ramesh; A Kirubakaran; Jeevitha Mani; J Raghunathan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Ki-Young Lee; Kyung Su Shin; Ji-Hye Jung; Hye-Won Cho; Kyung-Hwan Kwon; Yu-Lee Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 6.  Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Paula López-Jarana; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comparison of Mechanical Resistance to Maximal Torsion Stress in Original and Nonoriginal or Compatible Prosthetic Implant Screws: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  António Sérgio Silva; José Manuel Mendes; Tiago Araújo; Carlos Aroso; Pedro Barreiros
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-02

8.  Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Amirhossein Fathi; Saba Khodadad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.