Literature DB >> 17171535

The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans.

Joan M Dafoe1, Irene T Armstrong, Doug P Munoz.   

Abstract

We examined the sensory and motor influences of stimulus eccentricity and direction on saccadic reaction times (SRTs), direction-of-movement errors, and saccade amplitude for stimulus-driven (prosaccade) and volitional (antisaccade) oculomotor responses in humans. Stimuli were presented at five eccentricities, ranging from 0.5 degrees to 8 degrees , and in eight radial directions around a central fixation point. At 0.5 degrees eccentricity, participants showed delayed SRT and increased direction-of-movement errors consistent with misidentification of the target and fixation points. For the remaining eccentricities, horizontal saccades had shorter mean SRT than vertical saccades. Stimuli in the upper visual field trigger overt shifts in gaze more easily and faster than in the lower visual field: prosaccades to the upper hemifield had shorter SRT than to the lower hemifield, and more anti-saccade direction-of-movement errors were made into the upper hemifield. With the exception of the 0.5 degrees stimuli, SRT was independent of eccentricity. Saccade amplitude was dependent on target eccentricity for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades within the range we tested. Performance matched behavioral measures described previously for monkeys performing the same tasks, confirming that the monkey is a good model for the human oculomotor function. We conclude that an upper hemifield bias lead to a decrease in SRT and an increase in direction errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17171535     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0817-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  31 in total

1.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of stimulus conditions on the performance of antisaccades in man.

Authors:  B Fischer; H Weber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Accuracy of visually and memory-guided antisaccades in man.

Authors:  P Krappmann; S Everling; H Flohr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Evidence for interactions between target selection and visual fixation for saccade generation in humans.

Authors:  D P Munoz; B D Corneil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions.

Authors:  P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement.

Authors:  M G Saslow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-08

7.  Influence of stimulus eccentricity and direction on characteristics of pro- and antisaccades in non-human primates.

Authors:  A H Bell; S Everling; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Dead zone for express saccades.

Authors:  H Weber; F Aiple; B Fischer; A Latanov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Release of fixation for pursuit and saccades in humans: evidence for shared inputs acting on different neural substrates.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades.

Authors:  D Guitton; H A Buchtel; R M Douglas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  24 in total

1.  Vector inversion diminishes the online control of antisaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jeffrey Weiler; Kendall Marriott; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of blocked vs. interleaved administration mode on saccade preparatory set revealed using pupillometry.

Authors:  Naila Ayala; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Nicotine differentially modulates antisaccade performance in healthy male non-smoking volunteers stratified for low and high accuracy.

Authors:  Nadine Petrovsky; Ulrich Ettinger; Boris B Quednow; Henrik Walter; Knut Schnell; Henrik Kessler; Rainald Mössner; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Alpha Oscillations Modulate Preparatory Activity in Marmoset Area 8Ad.

Authors:  Kevin Johnston; Liya Ma; Lauren Schaeffer; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.