Literature DB >> 9348120

Effects of stimulus conditions on the performance of antisaccades in man.

B Fischer1, H Weber.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of different spatial and temporal parameters on the saccadic reaction times (SRTs) of the antisaccades and on the frequency and the SRTs of erratic prosaccades in five adult human subjects. The subjects were instructed to aim their saccades to the side opposite to where a visual go-stimulus occurred. Parameters under consideration were: the gap duration (between 0 and 600 ms, and an overlap paradigm); the stimulus size (sizes of 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, and 0.4 degrees, using the gap 200-ms paradigm); and the stimulus eccentricity (1 degree, 2 degrees, 4 degrees, 8 degrees, and 12 degrees, with the gap 200-ms paradigm). A decrease in the anti SRTs and an increase in the error rate were observed with medium gap durations (200 ms, 250 ms), while the anti-SRTs were longer and the error rates lower with the shorter values (0 ms, 100 ms, and with the overlap paradigm) and with the long values (600 ms). A slight decrease in the anti-SRTs and an increase in the error frequency occurred with increasing eccentricity; the SRT distributions of the errors resembled closely those of prosaccades in corresponding prosaccade tasks with the same eccentricities. The stimulus size had only modest or no effects at all. Analysis of the distributions of the correction times of the erratic prosaccades showed that the intersaccadic intervals could be very short: in the range of express saccades, with a peak at 100 ms or in some subjects even shorter, with a peak at 40-50 ms. It is concluded that the performance of antisaccades is influenced by parameters that interact with the fixation and/or attention system of oculomotor control. Parameters supporting a disengagement of fixation at the time of stimulus onset provoke a reduction of the saccadic reaction times not only of prosaccades but also of antisaccades. Moreover, a certain state of disengagement seems to facilitate the occurrence of reflex-like errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348120     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Improving antisaccade performance in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Canan Karatekin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of ethanol on anti-saccade task performance.

Authors:  Sarah A Khan; Kristen Ford; Brian Timney; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effect of stimulus probability on anti-saccade error rates.

Authors:  Michael J Koval; Kristen A Ford; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interference between oculomotor and postural tasks in 7-8-year-old children and adults.

Authors:  Agathe Legrand; Karine Doré Mazars; Christelle Lemoine; Vincent Nougier; Isabelle Olivier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Pre-cue fronto-occipital alpha phase and distributed cortical oscillations predict failures of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Kara A Dyckman; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Saccadic instabilities and voluntary saccadic behaviour.

Authors:  E Gowen; R V Abadi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The automatic extraction and use of information from cues and go signals in an anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Clare L Blaukopf; Gregory J DiGirolamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Contrasting instruction change with response change in task switching.

Authors:  Ian G M Cameron; Masayuki Watanabe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Different cortical activations during visuospatial attention and the intention to perform a saccade.

Authors:  C S Konen; R Kleiser; F Bremmer; R J Seitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.