Literature DB >> 17171385

Designing feedback-based contrast enhancement for in vivo imaging.

Susie Y Huang1, Jon K Furuyama, Yung-Ya Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nonlinear feedback interactions induced by the spins themselves have recently been introduced as novel MRI contrast enhancement mechanisms sensitive to small differences in MR parameters. Developing feedback-based contrast enhancement into a useful tool for in vivo imaging requires improved techniques that are robust to inhomogeneity and sensitive to subtle anatomical/physiological variations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different imaging methods combining the radiation damping feedback field with the distant dipolar field, applied radio-frequency (RF) fields, and local dipole fields, respectively, were designed and tested through numerical simulations on simple phantoms. These methods were demonstrated experimentally on live guppy fish, developing frog embryos, and blood in in vitro tissue samples by microimaging at 14.1 T.
RESULTS: The developed feedback-based methods yielded images that identified distinct morphological features with superior contrast compared with conventional MR images and those acquired under radiation damping only. Positive contrast due to evolution under radiation damping and local dipole fields was also observed in SPIOs and blood.
CONCLUSION: Approaches to enhancing feedback-based contrast were successfully designed and demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. The newly devised methods were less sensitive to field inhomogeneity and prolonged evolution under the feedback fields, allowing for better visualization of contrast in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17171385     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-006-0061-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  24 in total

1.  In vivo intermolecular double-quantum imaging on a clinical 1.5 T MR scanner.

Authors:  J Zhong; Z Chen; E Kwok
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Resurrection of crushed magnetization and chaotic dynamics in solution NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Y Y Lin; N Lisitza; S Ahn; W S Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Three-dimensional digital mouse atlas using high-resolution MRI.

Authors:  M Dhenain; S W Ruffins; R E Jacobs
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Sizable concentration-dependent frequency shifts in solution NMR using sensitive probes.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Clemens Anklin; Jamie D Walls; Yung-Ya Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Charles H Cunningham; Takayasu Arai; Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; John M Pauly; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetic resonance microscopy of embryonic cell lineages and movements.

Authors:  R E Jacobs; S E Fraser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A high-temperature superconducting receiver for nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  R D Black; T A Early; P B Roemer; O M Mueller; A Mogro-Campero; L G Turner; G A Johnson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-02-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Generation of impossible cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in solution NMR.

Authors:  W S Warren; W Richter; A H Andreotti; B T Farmer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Techniques and probes for the study of Xenopus tropicalis development.

Authors:  Mustafa K Khokha; Christina Chung; Erika L Bustamante; Lisa W K Gaw; Kristin A Trott; Joanna Yeh; Nancy Lim; Jennifer C Y Lin; Nicola Taverner; Enrique Amaya; Nancy Papalopulu; James C Smith; Aaron M Zorn; Richard M Harland; Timothy C Grammer
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse.

Authors:  G Allan Johnson; Gary P Cofer; Sally L Gewalt; Laurence W Hedlund
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiation damping in modern NMR experiments: progress and challenges.

Authors:  V V Krishnan; Nagarajan Murali
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 9.795

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.